Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

check here http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/St...kes-t82083.html, it answered all my questions, i've got r33 gtst (sumitomos) 4 pots and gtr discs on the front of mine but as they were on it when i got it i couldn't say if they were a straight swap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5234528
Share on other sites

Not a straight swap but close enough. R33 gtr have the same bolt pattern but require a small spacer and a sleeve. R32 gtr just require a sleeve.

The M35 uses 14mm bolts and the Sumitomo's run 12mm bolts.

The braking doesn't feel much stronger, just more consistent and they don't fade like the stockers. Also performance pads are easy to find.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5234551
Share on other sites

Or get some 350Z brembos. See Danny's tutorial here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/M3...p;hl=m35+brembo

Pretty simple upgrade as long as you have wheels big enough to fit them.

I Just picked up a set off ebay and will be doing the same conversion next week when they arrive.

Cheers,

Ben.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5234617
Share on other sites

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/M3...p;hl=m35+brakes

This threads a bit old.....if you want to go bigger R33 GTR rotors and callipers should bolt straight up as well

Edited by Jetwreck
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5234638
Share on other sites

looking at getting D2'S 356 but they dont list them for the stagea so will it be the 350 z or the skyline gts or gtr or the v35 dont know which , think they will be more like the 350 z ?

350z or v35

Edited by iamhe77
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5235703
Share on other sites

Not a straight swap but close enough. R33 gtr have the same bolt pattern but require a small spacer and a sleeve. R32 gtr just require a sleeve.

The M35 uses 14mm bolts and the Sumitomo's run 12mm bolts.

The braking doesn't feel much stronger, just more consistent and they don't fade like the stockers. Also performance pads are easy to find.

Hi Scotty ,where do the spacer & sleeve go & how do you overcome the bolt size problem?Wish to try this upgrade so I need all the wisdom I can Get

Thanks Cad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5235842
Share on other sites

I used my lathe to spin up the spacer tube so it fits over the 12mm thread. It has to be 1mm thick, 12mm internal and 14 mm external. 12mm long I think. From what I have seen the r33/r34 gtr will also require a small spacer between the calliper and mount also, the r32 gtr callipers I used didn't, the disk was perfectly centered in them.

post-63525-1273980769_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5235961
Share on other sites

I used my lathe to spin up the spacer tube so it fits over the 12mm thread. It has to be 1mm thick, 12mm internal and 14 mm external. 12mm long I think. From what I have seen the r33/r34 gtr will also require a small spacer between the calliper and mount also, the r32 gtr callipers I used didn't, the disk was perfectly centered in them.

Scotty are the 33 & M35 disc's the same thickness? Thanks Cad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5236243
Share on other sites

I used my lathe to spin up the spacer tube so it fits over the 12mm thread. It has to be 1mm thick, 12mm internal and 14 mm external. 12mm long I think. From what I have seen the r33/r34 gtr will also require a small spacer between the calliper and mount also, the r32 gtr callipers I used didn't, the disk was perfectly centered in them.

Put your tool away, no need to show off :thumbsup:

Im not sure what the r33 disks are but the r32 gtr disks are 32mm. The M35 disks are about 20mm thick.

M35 fronts are 24-25mm thick, R33 are larger than R32, so will be much thicker than the standard M35 discs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5237286
Share on other sites

is there a kit out there to fit the mn35 , or does it share the same brake kit as a difrenet car like the v35 ?

K Sport do a 6 & 8 Pot kit for them. . pretty straight forward. . .but cost is around $2400 a pair. . use Brembo rotors for replacement and various pads like hawk and ferodo . .

A & B motor sports and others do them. . here in Sydney. . just google k sport and you will see options. . they are the V35 skyline ones.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5237902
Share on other sites

Im not sure what the r33 disks are but the r32 gtr disks are 32mm. The M35 disks are about 20mm thick.

Well I have my 33 twin pot front callipers and crossed drilled slotted 32gtr disc.Wish me luck cause I will probably need it. Appreciate your help. Cad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5238181
Share on other sites

Not a straight swap but close enough. R33 gtr have the same bolt pattern but require a small spacer and a sleeve. R32 gtr just require a sleeve.

The M35 uses 14mm bolts and the Sumitomo's run 12mm bolts.

The braking doesn't feel much stronger, just more consistent and they don't fade like the stockers. Also performance pads are easy to find.

What wheels do you have Scotty as the 33 callipers hit my standard wheels

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5248087
Share on other sites

17 x 9 inch Driftek's, (+30 I think) they fit like a glove other than the fronts hang out half an inch.

The rim clears the curved brace under the coilover by 3mm and I have 235 45 17 Kumho KU36 tyres. (speedo is out by 11 ks at 100.) Highly recommended.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5248434
Share on other sites

17 x 9 inch Driftek's, (+30 I think) they fit like a glove other than the fronts hang out half an inch.

The rim clears the curved brace under the coilover by 3mm and I have 235 45 17 Kumho KU36 tyres. (speedo is out by 11 ks at 100.) Highly recommended.

Hey scotty dont want to appear stupid but will the offset stop the rim from hitting the R33 upgrade callippers or is it the shape of th basket on the rim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320696-m35-brakes/#findComment-5249391
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...