Jump to content
SAU Community

Had A Few Runs.. Not Welcome Back Now .. Lol


Tomek
 Share

Recommended Posts

Had 3 clean runs in total tonight, glad the box held together..

R32 GTR (400kw) Full street trim

Run 1 (light take off) 13.653 - 3.4 = 60' - 124.30 mph

Run 2 (6500rpm release handbrake) 11.346 - 1.87 = 60' - 126.76mph

Run 3 (7500rpm side step) 11.494 - 1.882 = 60' - 126.05mph

It was very hard to keep traction in 1st & 2nd, the track up here in Nth QLD isn't exactly flash.... After the 1st run I got my notice that I ran a too high mph & that this would be my last meet until I get a harness, which im not keen to do (drive line's saving grace) so now I can only speculate..

I know that every second that comes off from your 60 equals 2 at the end... What im asking is ... "what do the above speeds equal to on a well prepared track"

I uploaded a video of one of the runs to, I apologize for the poor quality was shot on my phone..

Edited by Tomek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im going to try drag soon, looking forward to getting asked to not come back

The harness rule isnt too bad, i think the bad ones are the andra spec cage etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice work, I got similar times with the 32, maybe I should of slipped the clutch a little lol!. What rubber did you have?

Half worn Potenza adrenaline's (255/40/17) ... The track wasn't very well prepared & resulted in poor 6o's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno about that.

I once had a car that genuinley made 400kw atw but had shite power delivery and a shite power band and only ran 126mph also.

On another note supporting your case I've also ran 126mph in my current GTR when it had 295kw.

just my 2c as I hate the ol, your car can't be making that power comments... :cool:

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first thing 126mph says is that the car isn't showing 400kw.

you can't make half a response :cool: Tell us what it is really making :sweat:

126mph should = high 10's

Oh, and Tomek, you ARE welcome back to the track...you just have to have the appropriate safety gear (and licencing) :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging by a et calculator your car should be good for a 10.63 at 126mph this is only an estimate calculator but so either more or less is possible. This was calculated at your car mass (3256 pounds or 1480kg) and power (400kw or 536hp at the wheels).

We use this on our drag car and found it to be fairly close most of the time

If you wanna (or anyone else for that matter) play around with this so you can see for yourself the site is http://www.wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph.php

and you just need the weight of your car and hp.

On this site you can also find the power the car has through the wieght and et or the mph and et.

It is in american so you need pounds and horsepower to work it out.

Hope this helps

Cheers Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

awsome vids mate, love the limiter on the 2nd one,

N1GTR i hope u make a heap of vids of your car when u run it, or put a thread up in the NSW member forums for members to come watch. ill sure be there....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno about that.

I once had a car that genuinley made 400kw atw but had shite power delivery and a shite power band and only ran 126mph also.

On another note supporting your case I've also ran 126mph in my current GTR when it had 295kw.

just my 2c as I hate the ol, your car can't be making that power comments... :P

Michael

It would have to be a ferociously shit-house power delivery to genuinely make 400kW and run 126mph. My car made 335kW on the same dyno I've always tuned it on and ran 128.51mph @ 3243lbs. To be honest, the 335kW figure isn't really represented in the weight for power calculation either but it's a darn site closer than 126mph and 400kW.

The OP also mentions shitty street tyres and bad 60' times which will normally help mph (and hurt ET) so this isn't right either (even though the sixty was a respectable 1.8).

I'm not taking anything away from the run. 126mph is 126mph after all. But Blind Freddie could see in the first video posted that the power delivery is good and that the gate is open more often than it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

awsome vids mate, love the limiter on the 2nd one,

N1GTR i hope u make a heap of vids of your car when u run it, or put a thread up in the NSW member forums for members to come watch. ill sure be there....

Will do mate

Ill start the super long thread up again :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

got a mate that runs 125mph with an R32 GTR and it makes 300rwkw on UniGroups dyno so your 400kw is way off the mark. His car is also a complete street car with NOTHING stripped from the interior at all and races on Bob Jane All Rounders.

If its making 400 it should probably be capable of a low 10?

Post up your dyno sheet if you can

Edited by ido09s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting thread as I will be running mine soon. I think it just comes down to different reading dynos. I dont just mean Tomek's pass where some are suggesting he is making less then 400, but also results like the 126mph that wrxkilla ran with only 295kw which just doesnt seem enough power for that result. It just proves that you cant compare dyno figures unless its done on the same dyno and the same day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Car sounds awesome dude! Love the 290 one too lol.

A set of drag radials and a 1.6 60ft will see you into the high 10's.

My boss tuned a R34 that weighed 1650kg, made 360kW at the wheels and ran 11.6 @ 122mph also with a 1.8 60ft time.

I have run 134mph with 291kW at the wheels and 137mph with 387kW at the wheels, both on the same dyno, different turbo combinations. Power delivery has a big play in trap speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I once had a car that genuinley made 400kw atw but had shite power delivery and a shite power band and only ran 126mph also.

I agree, I know of a GTR that makes a genuine 550wkw, runs low 11s @ around 125 as the power is just way too peeky and not suited to drags at all IMO.

Just another example of how dyno peek power can mean very little in real life situations.

Robbie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got 60L of e85 in there at the moment
    • Don't forget to make sure the tank is full to the brim before you try to replace the fuel pump too, that is an essential step.
    • No, 260RS/4wd stagea is 33 GTR/GTS4 double wishbone all round, not struts. The 2wd cars are confusingly strut front. At there rear there is one balljoint at the outer end of the lower control arm. If you have HICAS (my Stagea doesn't, but I think 260RS did, there will be a balljoint of sorts where the HICAS arm attaches to the rear of the hub At the front, there are ball joints either end of the lower control arm, plus the tie rod end for the steering arm
    • So, 2 months later, I just couldn't see any way to be happy with that tank setup. Basically the baffle area is too big and too leaky, the sender was miles off and the no low fuel light thing really bugs me. Other than the fact the fuel hat could safely supply enough power to the pump, it was worse than factory. Biggest thing that bugged me is it would still run out of fuel in medium-high g corners from about 1/4 tank down which is annoying when you are trying to have a zoom, not to mention potentially engine killing if it gets just the right amount of lean-ness....and we've got a few of those corners in our round trip to town (well, bunnings...) So, credit to Frenchy's, they have put together a much better designed setup with what is effectively an in tank surge setup.   As it happens the actual hat is the same, so I switched the fittings across, re-used the single 525 pump, and added a spare pierburg lift pump that I had (must remember to replace that stock, it was a spare for the race car). The only real work to get it all done was to add a second power and earth to the hat which I did by going from a single output to double output relay (very low draw on the lift pump) and also the sender unit that clips into the factory pump holder was again way too loose (so I re-used the 2mm shims from the previous setup). Finally, I added the low fuel light sender from the factory cradle. So....I'll report back how it handles low fuel, and if the sender has any relation to actual fuel level in the tank....
    • The price isn't the issue, it's how hard my fuel pump is to remove now. I fabricated a custom bracket so my pump sits on the very bottom of the tank (I ran the tank down to 5L remaining to test it, works well). But it is a fkn NIGHTMARE to get the pump down into the tank now =/ words can't describe how much I hate fighting with the fuel pump/hanger now. The other issue is reliability, I'm driving down for WTA in a couple of months, I'd be less then impressed if I was half way to Sydney from Brisbane and my pump fails again =/ The other issue I had was my car battery was slowly failing, with low battery voltage my fuel pump couldn't keep up with what the reg was asking from it. I've replaced the battery and my fuel pressure is back to being perfect.  As for the low voltage situation that killed my previous battery, I've got a 150amp alternator sitting on my desk waiting to go in. Fingers crossed that will sort that issue. 
×
×
  • Create New...