Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As Mark Skaife proposes an off-peak speed limit on Victoria's main freeways of 140km/h, he also tries to persuade that speed wasn't the main factor of our death tolls. Instead, making it harder for people to get their licence will help. Thoughts?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/mark-skai...o-1225878944536

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/324697-140kmh-off-peak-speed-limit/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's about time someone with some real world experience on good driving skills, has brought out such a well publicised story.

When I finished my driving exam I said to the testing offier "Is that it?" Which pretty much sums up how inadequate our licensing system is.

As Mark Skaife proposes an off-peak speed limit on Victoria's main freeways of 140km/h, he also tries to persuade that speed wasn't the main factor of our death tolls. Instead, making it harder for people to get their licence will help. Thoughts?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/mark-skai...o-1225878944536

I couldnt agree more with Skaife, most European freeways are 130km/h and their per capita road toll is lower than ours. The problem is no government is going to invest in driving training, it wont win them many votes so its politically pointless. Also it doesnt solve the current problem, most drivers are absolutely useless so upping the speed limit with the current calibre of drivers will probably result in more accidents because people are idiots.

I'm far from the greatest driver, but I still to road rules like glue because my license is far too precious for me to lose. More people need to have that same mentality, make the penalties for bad driving 5x worse, 5x the points and 5x the fines, things would change very quickly drivers would become more alert and generally better. Its the only way to convert the current useless crop of road users to reasonable drivers. Obviously reforms would also have remove the stupid 0-10km/h over the speed limit bullshit and a few other things but I think given time it could work. But in doing that you would K.O a massive source of government revenue, if you get done for 25km/h you lose your license as opposed to being able to pay 4 fines, you only pay 1, so its doubtful something like that would ever be implemented.

I will never understand why the coppers target the import and modified car community and not the old bombs you see every day driving to work on bald tyres with blue smoke coming out the exhaust.

I will never understand why the coppers target the import and modified car community and not the old bombs you see every day driving to work on bald tyres with blue smoke coming out the exhaust.

$$$$$

who do you think has a greater capacity to pay fines.. the guy with the $1k car or the guy with the $1k exhaust? :ninja:

$$

who do you think has a greater capacity to pay fines.. the guy with the $1k car or the guy with the $1k exhaust? :D

Good call, I didnt really think of it like that. I suppose i'm not some revenue hungry politician or a copper so it didnt really enter my thought process, in my mind its get the fine, pay the fine, problem solved.

I wish someone with some real clout could stand up and finally say the police are being used for revenue raising not fighting crime. Its not the coppers place to be the revenue collectors for politicians, its their job to lock up crims.

Edited by FrangaR33
Good call, I didnt really think of it like that. I suppose i'm not some revenue hungry politician or a copper so I didnt really enter my thought process, in my mind its get the fine, pay the fine, problem solved.

I wish someone with some real clout could stand up and finally say the police are being used for revenue raising not fighting crime. Its not the coppers place to be the revenue collectors for politicians, its their job to lock up crims.

where did my extra $ signs go? lol

in many other people's minds (although not mine), the thought process is: get the fine, swear profusely, struggle to pay said fine

sadly i don't think the revenue raising strategies of VicPol are ever going to be sufficiently criticised.

Definitely license tests shout be more strict. I believe it should be compulsory to take an advanced driving course before you even get your license. When I did my L's on my bike a girl got through even though she crashed in the test! They just let people through.

As for higher speed limits it would definitely be logical. Most of the freeways are built for more than 100 km/h, it could make a massive difference. Adjustable speed limits are the way to go, including lowering the limits in peak hour.

even if the freeways are designed so well to support 130-140km/h speed limit...

but does your average P-plater Joe & Jane have gone enough training to tackle merging or freeway change lane at that speed?

the major difference between australian driving licensing system and those say, in Germany, is that here it is too easy to obtain a license with just a written test and a relatively slow speed test around suburban streets. in most other countries you won't pass your driving test unless you can prove to be able to merge into autobahn freeways at 160km/h

what i've seen around me is just gonna be more case of autobahn casualties where people from east germany who had never been exposed to those blistering speed got themselves killed within a few months of 'free germany' opened up to the easterners and free cross-border european union. at least until the licensing system and testing is changed to really aimed to build driver skill, not to lower insurance claim from parking spot reversing bingles.

how could i not vote for a higher speed limit it should be increased at certain times on GOOD ROADS(FREEWAYS) where there is free flowing traffic then they just have to teach the morons to KEEP LEFT UNLESS OVERTAKING and fine the slower traffic just like they do for going over the limit

20 years ago, our freeways speed limits were 100kph. Back then, most cars did not have air bags, ABS, VDC, BA etc etc..

Now 20 years ahead, our cars are much much much safer, and yet the speed is still the same at 100kph?!

unfortunately, mick, I've seen people driving with not enough skill to keep up with the rest of the average....

these are the first ones who're likely to go on the road toll statistics with the new limits, and you know the govt will use that statistics to just bring the limit back down or even lower than it was before...

i would love to have an autobahn style freeways here but if they ever do so, with these kind of uncompetent drivers I see everyday in the road, I am truly fearful of my own safety if I am zooming in right lane at 160km/h in a future 'australian autobahn' when these untrained drivers come onto my path just to sit at 90km/h with less than 30m for me to reduce speed and a Ferrari coming up my rearview mirror fast as it was doing 200km/h. I was told this is how most accident in Autobahn Germany happened, involving a local west german rear-ending an eastern germany new immigrants, ending up killing the eastern germans in their Lada while the western germans had a slightly better since they have airbags in their AMG.

the licensing system need to change, e.g. make advance driving course compulsory to get on L, 2nd level of advance driving compulsory to get on P, and another full rigorous test (or semi-motorsport course) required to get to Full license. An exercise that easily be around 6-7 years to get to full license instead of just 3 years. Then we can have an autobahn, and traffic will be flowing indeed. Oh, and to make sure everyone is safe, I'm sure the government will also want to mandate a compulsory annual RWC and go through everything (worn tyres, worn/modified suspension, illegal HID lights) to make sure all cars complied and capable of doing autobahn speed and come to a stop in less than 150m from 160km/h. England has annual MOT (similar to RWC) as well as Japan as a similar roadworthy inspection every 3 years.

oh and the annual RWC may mean you'll have to return all mods to stock to pass it.

I can see how this will only be possible, annual RWC (and probably EPA test), Compulsory Advance Driver Skill Course (repeatable every x year) to keep your license, then the autobahn. All 3 must be linked together. Just more money for the government. driving your car will just about to get a lot more expensive.

i couldnt agree anymore, speed doesnt kill people, inexperience does..and if you dont feel comfortable at 140km/h then go slower.. notice the votes 75% agree the limits should be raised. goverments fkd

+1 Incorporate the fast and slow lane.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thank you, 100% the intent. New coils were due and the 17" sixers look/feel loads better than the stock wheels. The aero options are so spot on.   Thanks for the warm welcome, all!
    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...