Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as ethanol burns colder than pulp, e85 has differing spark plug requirements, so i figured we need a dedicated thread.

this thread is to list what you are using and how it performs.

just copy and paste this:

[b]CAR:[/b]

[b]POWER:[/b]

[b]TYPE OF ETHANOL:[/b]

[b]PLUG:[/b]

[b]GAP:[/b]

[b]COLD START:[/b]

[b]HOT:[/b]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325835-the-e85-sparkplug-thread/
Share on other sites

ok, i'll get the ball rolling :rolleyes:

CAR: R33 (RB25DET)

POWER: 323rwkw

TYPE OF ETHANOL: Powerplus E85 (made by manildra, from wheatgrain)

PLUG: BCPR7ES

GAP: 0.9

COLD START: horrible, 10 odd cranks in winter

HOT: perfect performance once warmed up

i'm thinking of trying 5's but i would like to see some people's results with cold start on 6's first

With all due respect, there is no one correct plug for any engine or power. The only correct way to determine what is the best plug for your application is to start with one, run it for 5000 and pull it out to see what she looks like. It is a good idea to see what others are running, though, so you know roughly where to start from. But where hp vs heat range is concerned, due to the colder burn of the ethanol, you'd be able to go back to a factory recommended heat range and work it from there.

  • Like 1

Yeah, I realise that but I thought having a reference might be a good idea for the future.

The other spark plug thread has determined a few fail safe options over the time it has been running And I am hoping for a similar result here :P

I might go for 6's @ 1.1 next time and see how I go...

CAR: M35 Stagea

POWER: 250awkw

TYPE OF ETHANOL: Powerplus E85

PLUG: Denso IKH22

GAP: 1.1

COLD START: Woeful, I have to add 10% unleaded this time of year to get it to fire. Started this morning at 3 degrees with little issue.

HOT: Perfect.

From my experience ethanol burns hotter and faster when under high boost pressures, a colder plug will be fine. I doubt I will be changing plugs just to get the engine to start better.

Ethanol doesn't evaporate below 15 degrees which is why we have issues, its the petrol mixed in that fires for the first few rotations.

Yeah... This is the reason we don't run e100 afaik

cold start doesn't really bother me too much, it's annoying when I am dailying it, but the ke70 should be finished pretty soon.... But I'll bet dollars to dimes I'll have that thing turboed and on the juice within 6 months anyway :P

for the guys having cold start issues, add a massive amount of fuel, like 50% and take timing back to 0 or 5 degrees. it was something said by a tuner from the states, doesnt seem to have cold start issues, even below 0*c.

There are a few drawbacks I see with that...

If you flood the bore with liquid ethanol it will run down past the rings into the oil and help to break it down.

It is still only the petrol firing, if you ran e100 it still wouldn't want to start well, also with below zero temps.

It would require an arftermarket ecu for those that just run larger injectors or higher fuel rail pressures.

I would have to give up the knock signal on my Emanage in order to wire in the temp signal, then I would have to get a cold retune.

I want to fit a small (say one litre) petrol canister in the engine bay, probably in 3 inch stainless pipe. I have the original fuel pump to slide in the pipe and one of the stock 370cc injectors will install nicely into the manifold. Power these from a simple push button on the dash and you're set. I have seen guys in the US running simpler systems they work very well and save wasting ethanol at startup

yeah just had a quick look over what i thought i read ages ago. seems its only good down to 5-10 degrees C, below 5 it doesnt work. i was confusing it with another one that cold started fine in freezing weather, but not on E85

I think e85 cold starting will be an issue for those with lower compression more so than cold plugs, my VQ25det only runs 8.5:1 compared to 9:1 for the stock RB's. I need boost at startup.

I would really like to see somebody build an ethanol specific high compression engine with high boost, wish I had the funds to build one myself. Perhaps one day... if I keep pushing this one... :down:

did you run that gap on pulp?

No, it was .8 from memory.

I think e85 cold starting will be an issue for those with lower compression more so than cold plugs, my VQ25det only runs 8.5:1 compared to 9:1 for the stock RB's. I need boost at startup.

I would really like to see somebody build an ethanol specific high compression engine with high boost, wish I had the funds to build one myself. Perhaps one day... if I keep pushing this one... :down:

One of my friends has a 9.5:1 CR (RB25/30) and his is a pig to start aswell.

i would have thought to achieve better cold start you'd want to lean it off a fair bit.

how many tuners spend enough time on the cold start map anyway... the answer is not enough.

+1

Spark plug is going to have f**k all effect on cold start - unless it's fouled of course

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...