Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, this is more a "just curious" topic, but i purchased a car (havnt picked it up yet) and the car has a 3.5 inch zorst with a stock turbo, now in the past ive had a 3 inch zorst on the same system and found it enough, but will 3.5 inch be worse for the performance of the car? to me it seems like there wouldnt be enough back pressure.

Anyway, i guess the MAIN question is, how much of a drop in perfomance will there be with this exhaust? should i invest in a 3inch?

stock PSI to BTW

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/
Share on other sites

It will not hinder performance.

EPA issues however are most likely.

sound or pollution?

An exhaust CAN'T be 'to big' UNLESS you are going to give the exhaust 'to Big Al, your mate'.

Otherwise it is 'too big'.

But in this case, it isn't.

:P

i dont get it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306028
Share on other sites

sound or pollution?

i dont get it

Lol. 'to' and 'too' - two (hehe) different words.

The problem will be with volume, but I wouldn't worry about it (unless you get defected).

The size shouldn't make any difference to emissions as long as there is still a cat.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306048
Share on other sites

Lol. 'to' and 'too' - two (hehe) different words.

The problem will be with volume, but I wouldn't worry about it (unless you get defected).

The size shouldn't make any difference to emissions as long as there is still a cat.

no i don want to take the cat out, srsly, i dont want the extra 500rwkw from taking the cat out, its just to fast for me, so ill leave it in.

i was under the impression that you need some sort of back pressure, but iono

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306058
Share on other sites

no i don want to take the cat out, srsly, i dont want the extra 500rwkw from taking the cat out, its just to fast for me, so ill leave it in.

i was under the impression that you need some sort of back pressure, but iono

I believe the extra 500rwkw will make it too fast for you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306088
Share on other sites

turbo engines are rather different to natro engines when it comes to exhaust requirements. as has been said, you won't notice any difference between a 3" and 3.5" system. if it was on a NA car, then it would be a totally different story

ok, good thanks! :P

i dont realy care about the size, i just didnt want it to be any worse than a 3 inch, which i beleive is optimal for a stock turbo.

I believe the extra 500rwkw will make it too fast for you.

is that all you picked up? lol what about - don, srsly or iono, but its good to see u picked up a missing "o"

cheers mate :angry:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306102
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned any of those 'made up' internet slang words mean you are speaking another language.

But mix up your 'to, too, two' or 'you're, your' etc while attempting English and it's just plain slack. :P

But srsly, your exhaust is fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306173
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned any of those 'made up' internet slang words mean you are speaking another language.

But mix up your 'to, too, two' or 'you're, your' etc while attempting English and it's just plain slack. :P

But srsly, your exhaust is fine.

hehe ok cheers mate

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306181
Share on other sites

It won't decrease performance, on engines with forced induction the less exhaust restriction the better.

My 33 had a 3.5" system with a stock turbo and very few mods and it was pretty damn loud (didn't have a cat or any mufflers bar the cannon though), did sound mint but.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5306751
Share on other sites

Provided you have control of the fueling and timing it shouldn't be a problem , noise and cops aside .

The theory is that the best exhaust is no exhaust behind a turbocharger which obviously isn't going to cut it in a road car .

The turbo rally people like to start out big behind the turbo and step down in stages on the way to the back . What this is said to do is maintain gas speed in the exhaust system as the gas cools and contracts so to speak .

Its a way of having a large volume behind the systems chief restriction , all gasses are channelled and accelerated into the turbine housing , so the red hot gasses have room to expand into . The way to drive the turbine is to have hot gas at speed on one side and a large volume to spread out into on the other side .

As the gas cools it wants to slow down if the exhaust tract is the same all the way to the back , if it slows down too much you can have reversion issues if say the turbo/exhaust manifold/ports/valves/cams are sized to make high rev grunt .

So , the way to keep it moving is to step the tube size down in stages so that the gasses maintain some momentum and velocity .

My old dinosaur Subaru RX Turbo (1.8L 2 valve tiny port flat four GT2554R turbo) has a 3" tube from the turbo to the back of the gearbox and 2 1/2 from there . Its surprisingly quiet but both mufflers are in the 2 1/2 section behind the 3" cat .

It still has its AM radio tech computer and suffers no reversion crap/no pops spits OR drones anywhere .

I suggest that if you have to do something to reduce noise start at the back , its the cheapest easiest way that gives the least restriction in an exhaust system . Car manufacturers having been doing precisely this for some years now .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5307360
Share on other sites

Provided you have control of the fueling and timing it shouldn't be a problem , noise and cops aside .

The theory is that the best exhaust is no exhaust behind a turbocharger which obviously isn't going to cut it in a road car .

The turbo rally people like to start out big behind the turbo and step down in stages on the way to the back . What this is said to do is maintain gas speed in the exhaust system as the gas cools and contracts so to speak .

Its a way of having a large volume behind the systems chief restriction , all gasses are channelled and accelerated into the turbine housing , so the red hot gasses have room to expand into . The way to drive the turbine is to have hot gas at speed on one side and a large volume to spread out into on the other side .

As the gas cools it wants to slow down if the exhaust tract is the same all the way to the back , if it slows down too much you can have reversion issues if say the turbo/exhaust manifold/ports/valves/cams are sized to make high rev grunt .

So , the way to keep it moving is to step the tube size down in stages so that the gasses maintain some momentum and velocity .

My old dinosaur Subaru RX Turbo (1.8L 2 valve tiny port flat four GT2554R turbo) has a 3" tube from the turbo to the back of the gearbox and 2 1/2 from there . Its surprisingly quiet but both mufflers are in the 2 1/2 section behind the 3" cat .

It still has its AM radio tech computer and suffers no reversion crap/no pops spits OR drones anywhere .

I suggest that if you have to do something to reduce noise start at the back , its the cheapest easiest way that gives the least restriction in an exhaust system . Car manufacturers having been doing precisely this for some years now .

A .

thanks for the info, very helpful, so with the 3.5 system in there with stock dump and front pipe, its not helping it i assume haha, but i will invest in a 3 inch bellmouth for the dump/front.

i dont have an issue with sound at all, its quite quiet actualy...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5307384
Share on other sites

so ive heard

What im wondering will a 3 inch dump/front pipe into 2 3/4 catback be aiight..is there any real point buying a whole system for 1/4 of an inch?

Or will i be captain sloooow.........

the only place you may lose some power is high up in the revs. general driving around and even just reving up to around 5000rpm probably won't make a scrap of difference. anything above that i think you would have to put it on a dyno to see the difference in power. don't think you'd notice the power when driving it. if you were aiming for 250kw+ then it might be worth going 3" though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5307439
Share on other sites

so if you were after more responsive midrange power the 3.5" exhaust is too large, is that what people are saying?

I was told by a tuner that a 2.5" custom made exhaust would be better than my 3.5" hks, this is what I was told when I told him I wanted to get a tune done for a HKS2835 with supporting mods...

I did say I was after good midrange response, and that I was not interested in ultimate peak power.

I didnt know wheather to trust him or not?

this is on a 33gtst

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325866-35-inch-to-big/#findComment-5308677
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...