Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 329
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

No biggie for me mate, it was on the exact same dyno not even 3 weeks prior so it really didn't bother me. Much rathered giving my spot to Matty to see if he could fix his issues on a second run :D

thanks for that too luke

much kudos to martin and kier and the boys at willall. especially for the advice regarding my rather shit state of ignition timing, and the lend of a timing light (and roo's spare CAS too). at least i can confidently say that i know it wont blow up next weekend :D

Looks like i missed an awesome day! Totally spewing i had to go to the show instead.

That you did considering the show is crap :D

thanks for that too luke

Not a problem bud. Like I said to you on the day; atleast you know what's wrong with it and what needs to be fixed. Just get on top of it before something else rears its ugly head. GTR's can get $$$

Not a problem bud. Like I said to you on the day; atleast you know what's wrong with it and what needs to be fixed. Just get on top of it before something else rears its ugly head. GTR's can get $$$

yeah, thats it. at least it'll be alright for this weekend, then i can take a breath and sort it all out. turbos, oil lines, cams (maybe LOL)

What would be cool is if we could get a big ass graph with everyones power curves overlaid

would really put things into perspective, not just be about peak power but to also show how responsive some cars are

not sure if it can be done but it'd be awesome if we could do that next dyno day :D

also some r32 gtrs were ran awd and some were ran rwd - bit of a discrepancy there for the sakes of comparison

those are the only two things that I think would improve the next dyno day - beer would probably improve it too

-D

Willall don't like Running 32 GTR's in AWD as it stuff around with your attessa

as for graph would possibly look like a mess a 5 yr old has drawn

depends how u overlaid it

obviously you wouldnt have a 100kw car on a 200kw chart nor a 200kw car on a 300kw chart

colour coded lines are done all the time. sure it could be done, even if one had to plot graph points into another piece of software

the first bunch of gtrs were ran in 4wd... didnt seem to have any visible problems? only ones that werent ran in awd was my own and panzers.. i for one was very keen on seeing how much power loss i'd get in 4wd mode as opposed to rwd only

-D

and RH9

you only see a difference of 5% with AWD

yeah the overlay could be done, not 100% sure what it achieves as there is 25 cars run with almost 20 different tuners

doesnt matter what the tuners are - the result on the same dyno is the benchmark - and thats why it would be interesting to see.

its all very well and good for me to go to my tuner and get a printout, but every dyno is different - if u neutralize that variable by having them all ran on the same dyno (pref all in rwd tho i know it cant be done) then you'd get a good idea of actual real world power and torque curves

not criticising the event in any way at all, just that would be the icing on the cake imho

-D

My car was about 16kw different from 4wd to rwd on GW's dyno.

how much were u doing in both awd and rwd? interesting a percentage value so i can compare it with other peoples results - can help when regarding how efficient the transfer case is on any given power level - as well as the comparison between the 33 and 34 attessa systems to the 32's admittedly slower reacting attessa

-D

Just a quick heads up - none of the R32 Based cars were run in AWD mode. The reason for this is that their ATTESSA control doesnt operate consistently on the dyno, any dyno, hence its not good for the life of the transfer case - and 32 transfer cases are - very - fragile. What you may have seen is some of the earlier run 32s set up on the rear bed, as we had the dyno set is RWD/AWD mode and the straps setup to run the cars this way (we let MattyTs GTR run the front wheels for a bit as we believed it had a fault and we could identify it that way for him). There should be no difference between running front bed/rear bed in terms of power. Notably one of the GTRs went 309rwkw on the rear bed in the morning, and at the end of the day when it (the engine) was a lot cooler it ran 316rwkw which is about right. We test the variance between the beds regularly :P

Just a quick heads up - none of the R32 Based cars were run in AWD mode. The reason for this is that their ATTESSA control doesnt operate consistently on the dyno, any dyno, hence its not good for the life of the transfer case - and 32 transfer cases are - very - fragile. What you may have seen is some of the earlier run 32s set up on the rear bed, as we had the dyno set is RWD/AWD mode and the straps setup to run the cars this way (we let MattyTs GTR run the front wheels for a bit as we believed it had a fault and we could identify it that way for him). There should be no difference between running front bed/rear bed in terms of power. Notably one of the GTRs went 309rwkw on the rear bed in the morning, and at the end of the day when it (the engine) was a lot cooler it ran 316rwkw which is about right. We test the variance between the beds regularly :P

cool thx for clearing that up :D looks like the 32s all had pretty interesting results

I was sure that redbacks nur would be pulling more than he did which is why I thought i'd ask

-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually, that's not entirely true. It's also the same motor in the 1st gen Nissan Cube but they're rare as hen's teeth.  
    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...