Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, a hypothetical (learning about tuning):

if I was to drop 3-5% of the fuel out of the base map of an RB25 ie under 4k rpm and under '10' load (tuning in VE) in order to increase cruising and light load fuel efficiency, would I also need to drop an equivalent amount of timing from these areas to compensate for the lower air/fuel ratio?

Does anyone know any guides to this effect that compare the relationship of fuel / afr and timing maps?

Am I even thinking about this the correct way...?

Cheers!

Edited by gwilkinson34
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329205-novice-tuning-question/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Closed loop ecu? if so just change the closed loop target afr. At low rpm ou shouldnt need to adjust the timing at all

Haltech P2000 - there's an AFR target table but in the docs it talks about dyno tuning and adjusting the fuel table to 'match' the desired AFR target... assuming this means it doesn't automatically adjust? Or does it automatically adjust just timing?

Ps I have no tuning experience and next to no automotive engineering experience - I do have a fair bit of general software knowledge and a working understanding of EFI / forced induction theory - essentially i'm a tuning / mechanic noob but very tech savvy so i reckon I can work it out... :)

I wouldn't be learning to how to tune on a expensive engine (NEO RB25DET), let alone messing with a professional tune (judging by power listed in car profile), really shouldn't be touching fuel at all without a wideband o2 sensor and long stretches of road in the middle of nowhere. Take it to your tuner and tell them your fuel economy goal get them to put it on the dyno and adjust the AFRs as safely to stoich as possible, it would probably be less than 1 hr dyno time.

I wouldn't be learning to how to tune on a expensive engine (NEO RB25DET), let alone messing with a professional tune (judging by power listed in car profile), really shouldn't be touching fuel at all without a wideband o2 sensor and long stretches of road in the middle of nowhere. Take it to your tuner and tell them your fuel economy goal get them to put it on the dyno and adjust the AFRs as safely to stoich as possible, it would probably be less than 1 hr dyno time.

Yeah I understand your point - but I'm not touching anything above 4,000rpm or half load so it's safe. I wont be mucking with WOT or high boost / load areas of the map (obviously without a dyno) so I don't really see how anything can be broken. Just fine tuning the fuel on idle and light load / cruising. It's the sort of thing that probably doesn't get enough attention on a 'professional tune' most of the time anyway...

I've got the original tune saved so really i'm just having a bit of a dip in the 'kiddy pool' area of the map - playing with idle control etc. Spent all this cash so I might as well learn what's going on!

Getting it tuned on E85 in a couple weeks so i'll be showing the changes I make to the map to my tuner and discussing it all with him then, while I watch him adjust everything for the ethanol.

(I'm the kind of guy that needs to know how everything works, obviously!)

Also on your "as close to stoich as possible" comment - surely that's not the most fuel efficient (across the whole map) way of tuning - leaning everything out a tad on deceleration would provide better fuel economy would it not...?

Any decent ecu on decel will totally cut fuel. Changing your afr target leaner that stoich will save fuel but you also have to watch combustion temps not that it will do any harm while cruizing but a sudden hit of boost my not like the extra heat

Check the injector duty cycle while cruising and idling, there's not a great deal of fuel going into the engine to begin with, and it's the O2 (lowband) sensors job to lean out the mixture while cruising at constant load or idle. A good point has been made, doing fuel map modifications yourself without a wideband sensor you could risk making the combustion temps skyrocket while cruising with a leaner mixture, and suddenly hitting boost might cause the engine to detonate.

the leaner u go past stoich, the more u'll have to open the throttle, adding more fuel anyway.

Thats the whole premise behind lean cruise strategies they had in the late 90's. As your lean the mixture you need more throttle hence the pumping losses are reduced as the vacuum reduces as well.

The other thing most people dont realise is that the highest EGT's are around stoich ie 14.4-15 either side of this AFR the combustion chamber temps go down.

Advancing the timing 5-10degrees will help also. I would also look increasing your plug gap if you can. Also if you are tuning VE and your VE is correct then I would just change your desired AFR table to say 17:1. That is if the haltch software works properly.

Also if you are tuning VE and your VE is correct then I would just change your desired AFR table to say 17:1. That is if the haltch software works properly.

Does this actually do anything though? What I understand from reading up on the ECU software is that the desired AFR table is just that, a 'desired AFR' and then you tune the fuel map to reach this... ie changing the desired AFR doesn't automatically change anything tune wise... or have I got that wrong?

You would need a wideband plugged into the ECU to get it to know what AFR it was running wouldn't you? (which i will be organising next week...)

yes you need a wideband to do anything at all with AFR's

+1 for more timing. i added more than 20 degrees timing to my light load areas after a "professional" tune, it was a completely different car to drive after that. also improves fuel economy a lot

Check the injector duty cycle while cruising and idling

I can't for the life of me work out how to check the injector duty cycle in the Haltech software. The injectors should be wired up to an analogue voltage input shouldn't they? Can't seem to find it.

Anyone know anything about how to check this?

You will only see the injector duty cycle with the engine running

Yeah I had a quick look for it last night... perhaps I didn't have the correct views open.

Have another look today and log my drive down to get a haircut hehe.

Does this actually do anything though? What I understand from reading up on the ECU software is that the desired AFR table is just that, a 'desired AFR' and then you tune the fuel map to reach this... ie changing the desired AFR doesn't automatically change anything tune wise... or have I got that wrong?

You would need a wideband plugged into the ECU to get it to know what AFR it was running wouldn't you? (which i will be organising next week...)

The way a desired AFR map "should" work is to enrich the mixtures. ie 12:1 is an enrichment of around 22% over stoich. I haven't used the haltech software as I just dont like using them but if its anything like an autronic then changing the desired AFR map will result in a change of fuelling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
    • Shock tower brace is in +5Kw....LOL  
×
×
  • Create New...