Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah 3071 looks better, thanks titan and ash.

surprisingly hard to find dyno graphs for 3071 (although they are on here with patience), the ratio of expectations to actual results is about 90%/10%

can't find one for $300 tho :O

hey duncan.

sorry to hijack your thread

do you by chance have a picture of your setup? and a dyno graph?

im thinking about running a t04e to get me out of trouble till christmas time and was wondering if it was really that good of an idea or not.

cheers john.

  • 2 weeks later...
A 3040 is too big, they all carry the 550-600hp region.

3071 is closer to what you want, and would be on very early.

would that be at the wheels?

what psi do you think would be required to achieve that?

on a standard rebuilt rb30 would that power be safe with water meth injection and 7500 rpm limit?

sorry to ask these questions on your thread duncan...

thats at the crank, which would be around 450-500rwhp. would probably need well over 20psi with a fairly standard head. with water meth a stock block should hold up alright, all comes down to the tune

On juice (sunoco 104) i made 370rwkw @ 24psi on a RB25

270-280rwkw on 17psi... So given say 20psi on a 3ltr with a tidyied up head etc - ~310-330rwkw i would imagine is somewhere around the ballpark.

E85 surely would see you 350rwkw if not more.

They flow a bit more than 3076's and most 3076's with meth/20psi (on 2.5ltrs) see around 300rwkw give/take.

Duncan have you considered having someone such as hypergear redo one of your china turbos?

Surely he can redo it to a similar spec (achieve similar results) and his CHRA's seem to have reasonable rep for reliability.

I am not recommending this, I would rather hear you got off your china high and bought a real turbo, but just wondering if you have considered the option.

hahaha not happening (or at least I am a slow learner). I don;t beleive there is anything fundamentally wrong with every product that comes from a whole country.

but yes, they are modifiying the turbo this time to deal with the weakness (thrust washer)...will see if it makes a difference.

lets remember my goals.....250awkw from an rb30 with heaps of low end torque.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...