Jump to content
SAU Community

Do I Have A Petrol System That Utilizes Electronic Sequential Injection ?


Recommended Posts

Does a 1996 skyline gts 4 door sedan ( non turbo) use a petrol system that utilizes electronic sequential injection ?

I beliebe this is a requirement if I want to run liquid injection LPG.

Any comments on LPG appreciated, except from the flat earth society.

Ahh... Yeah man... Rb engines (for the most part) are all injected...

There's only one version that's carburetted, an rb24s, in some random jap small car.

Any engine that doesn't have a carburetor, uses fuel injectors and an ECU, to inject fuel. Pretty much every petrol engine from the mid80s, is injected.

LPG isn't really the best option tho IMO, you hardly save much money anyway... Limits the amount of power you make, saps some power from you, adds weight to your car, and they use more fuel anyway, so you spend more at the bowser...

Ahh... Yeah man... Rb engines (for the most part) are all injected...

There's only one version that's carburetted, an rb24s, in some random jap small car.

Any engine that doesn't have a carburetor, uses fuel injectors and an ECU, to inject fuel. Pretty much every petrol engine from the mid80s, is injected.

LPG isn't really the best option tho IMO, you hardly save much money anyway... Limits the amount of power you make, saps some power from you, adds weight to your car, and they use more fuel anyway, so you spend more at the bowser...

there are different sorts of injection though. there is single point injection (basically a fancy carby) and multipoint injection. but yes, skylines as with most cars made after about 1990 use multipoint (sequential) injection.

The evolution seems to have been;

- carburettor

- single point/throttle body injection

- mutli point batch injection

- multi point sequential injection

- direct multi point sequential injection

Ahh... Yeah man... Rb engines (for the most part) are all injected...

There's only one version that's carburetted, an rb24s, in some random jap small car.

Any engine that doesn't have a carburetor, uses fuel injectors and an ECU, to inject fuel. Pretty much every petrol engine from the mid80s, is injected.

LPG isn't really the best option tho IMO, you hardly save much money anyway... Limits the amount of power you make, saps some power from you, adds weight to your car, and they use more fuel anyway, so you spend more at the bowser...

There was also an RB30S im pretty sure, in old patrols?

i can just imagine the boot space in a r33 with LPG

but why would u want to run LPG in a "performance" car

since when is an n/a a performance car? :P

The evolution seems to have been;

- carburettor

- single point/throttle body injection

- mutli point batch injection

- multi point sequential injection

- direct multi point sequential injection

Just a nit pick, but multipoint, batch and sequential injection are all different,

Multipoint fires all the injectors at once, but at multiple points in the engine (hence multipoint)

Batch fires in the same way wasted spark ignition does, ie 2 cylinders at a time

and sequential fires individually in accordance to the firing order of the engine

Just a nit pick, but multipoint, batch and sequential injection are all different,

Multipoint fires all the injectors at once, but at multiple points in the engine (hence multipoint)

Batch fires in the same way wasted spark ignition does, ie 2 cylinders at a time

and sequential fires individually in accordance to the firing order of the engine

just to nit pick what you are saying, both batch and sequiential are both actually multipoint injection. multipoint just simply refers to whether there is a single injection point (like at the throttle body) or multiple injection points (an injector in each intake runner). nissan specs attribute the 370z with having sequential multi-point injection.

Yeah but that is just marketing spin

A bit like holdens SI-Di shit...Spark Ignition Direct Injection...Spark ignition WOW REALLY! What were you using before that Holden?

Andrew, sort of on topic, but I agree completely with that point! Almost everything that companies advertise on their cars is just a name they give to a STANDARD FEATURE OF ALL MODERN CARS just to make it seem unique and special. SIDI is a prime example.

Yeah but that is just marketing spin

A bit like holdens SI-Di shit...Spark Ignition Direct Injection...Spark ignition WOW REALLY! What were you using before that Holden?

my point was though that both sequiential and batch injection are multipoint injection as they inject fuel at mulitple points. the batch injection just refers to multiple injectors firing it at once. it can be two or all of them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...