Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh look i watched it all and it was ok, if there wasnt some commentary I'd have fallen asleep.

I just think the game overall isn't that enthralling.

AT im now 13-7 lol, the matching system decided to pair us (we are silver) with expert diamond players 3 games in a row.

Gotta love blizzards matching system's decisions *facepalm*, not one game have they got it correct.

I've actually been reading up on how the whole system works, seems you basically have to mass more games for it to workout and doesnt inititally grade you correctly at all which kinda makes redundant the 5 "placement" matches.

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I noticed that too. I remember playing with a mate who's pretty new at the game. We were placed in Bronze League and every load screen we'd be up again players with profile pictures that indicated 250+ wins etc.

I'll get the link when i get home that explains in depth the ladder system (except for the bits Blizzard doesnt want to include)

Going by that, it makes *some* sense why my mate & I matched such players, however not 4 games in a row based on the assumptions of the model that is being used.

Really? Sorry for wasting your time then, that was a very long set of videos.

I personally enjoy watching Starcraft commentaries, and thought that one was particularly entertaining.

I like watching them too... but it is all because of the commentary I guess. Couldn't be stuffed watching with the sound off.

Thanks for sharing those links though *plugs earphones into work computer*

Beat AI on Hard, got cocky and played Very Hard thinking i was awesome. I got beat in 8 minutes =~[

I don't see how they can have so many upgrades so quickly, 8 minutes and they had medivacks and siege mode. God knows what else! Little more practice and i might be on insane =p

So is it worth the $90?

I played a 7hour trial, got to mission 12 and played two 1v1's but I wiped quick in the first and tried playing zerg in the second, had no idea what I was doing but when the enemy scouted my small force they surrendered. Still not sure if $90 is good value for 14 more missions and the multi player problems you've all mentioned.

thanks

Once they patch the shit, for clans/public chat and stuff like that the online will become better.

Half the online is talking crap and stuff as much as the game itself haha.

We have a few of us getting semi-competitive with the game. <10 of us, all silver league or higher. Gets rough when LANs happen hahah

lol im plati or gold... i suspect i'll be in plati before long with my other teams as we are 23-10 or whatever in 2v2.

The matching system is a bit silly. Same as bnet 1 - all about game massing. Heaps of plati teams are 50-50, and shit. We wipe the floor 75% of the time and were placed in silver to start, ended in gold like 10 games later.

So id guess 2-3 more games plati and diamond wont be far away, maybe another 20-25 wins.

Oh and you can abuse the ladder just like you did in WC3 bnet 1.0

As your 5 "placement" matches basically pit you against RT players, if you get 5 mates together you can AT over 100 games basically matching useless players each match.

Soon as you get to 5 matches, just swap out for someone else and rotate. 10 people would make it ridiculous.

Rather sad and typical of Blizzard to implement such a system that is WORSE than the old one :(

Its fun playing with friends, but IMO 1v1 is where its at. It's a completely different game and comes down much more to micro and countering your opponents build. In a 1v1 even if they have the larger force using the high ground, base defenses and certain abilities you can hold off a superior force. Whereas team games seem to be more about massing your forces then overwhelming one single base.

yeh i like 1v1 and 2v2.. nismoid u take it too serious i dont even understand what your talkin about hahaha!

just got into 'silver' league but thats cos i suck my mate is pretty good but yeh.. im gettin there.

I just get into whatever game i play, and i like to understand how it all works.

I find enjoyment in the mechanics of a game and not just the actual 'playing' of it (which is also good of course hehe)

Should be plati for all leagues shortly... 8 straight today put me to the top of gold :thumbsup:

There are also some great custom game maps starting to appear now as well :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...