Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you went for a twin scroll GT3071R with a 0.78 housing you could get close to 300kw with cams and it would have a stupid amount of response. but this will be an expensive route as you need a twin scroll exhaust housing and you need twin gates to do it properly.

Another turbo that people haven't suggested is ether a TD06SL2-20G for just under 300kw or a T67 for over 300 with standard cams. Both these will need external gates as both the Trust and T3 flanged housings are external gate housings.

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

reason i ask is volk34 had his car on the same dyna pack dyno as you a couple weeks back and made 210kw. then today at the SAU-SA dyno day at willals

his car made 162rwkw. thats a 48kw difference between his 2 dyno runs

sorry to use your car as an example volk

There is something else going on there, in the past with the older version there was around 10% difference between dyna pack dynos and other drive on chassis dynos due to no correction for wheel slippage, but the newer versions seem to be pretty much the same as most mainlines.

Your talking about a 24% difference which sounds to me like something else is wrong. Also 162 would be just under what would be expected from a standard auto R34 (don't know what car his is) or is about right for a stock untouched R33. so what mods is he running, has his car been tuned? is it running more boost? was it running the same boost in Willals dyno?

Edited by D_Stirls
There is something else going on there, in the past with the older version there was around 10% difference between dyna pack dynos and other drive on chassis dynos due to no correction for wheel slippage, but the newer versions seem to be pretty much the same as most mainlines.

Your talking about a 24% difference which sounds to me like something else is wrong. Also 162 would be just under what would be expected from a standard auto R34 (don't know what car his is) or is about right for a stock untouched R33. so what mods is he running, has his car been tuned? is it running more boost? was it running the same boost in Willals dyno?

i think he has a auto r34 gtt. as for the other stuff i cant comment because i dont know.

"loksta6" you are now on notice and will receive an official warning..........followed by a ban if this slander towards a business continues.

Your post has been deleted but have attached a link to your warning fyi.

If anyone has an issue with a business, take it up with them but KEEP IT OUT OF HERE!!

thanks for all of your responses, as i had suspected gt3076 with .86 will be the one. i have all suporting mods and an eye out for some poncams. hopefully see and introduce myself next dyno day :P thanks.

i am pretty much going the same way mate

I'd get the .82 again if I was to buy another turbo. Response difference between .63 and .82 would only be a couple of hundred rpm max. And your going down the E85 route so the better flowing rear will make a world of difference when you start running higher boost levels. Come to think of it. Just get the 1.06 :D

after doing a bit more of a research your right Luke......63 and .82 rear housings dont have a world of difference in regards to response.....1.06 is in a league of its own isnt it??? :D

.63 rear housing should see me 300rwkw on 25??? mind you its going to be internal gated

ahh internally gated's a different story. get the .82.. you'll run into overboost issues with the smaller housing and IW.

FWIW mine is ex gated type .63 and makes 360 rwkw so the housing can flow more then 300 rwkw thats for sure.

While on the topic of turbo upgrades, I was looking into mix matching housings, staring with my 2530 ...

I'm thinking of upgrading the compressor side of my HKS GT2530 turbo.

The turbine side of the 2530 atm is a 76 trim (53.8 major - 47.0 exducer) wheel and 0.64AR T3 housing which I was going to keep.

Thinking of throwing on, on the compressor side ...

Garrett T04S upgrade kit

wheel: 59 / 76 / 60 trim

housing: AR70 (rated to 550hp)

Now the 2530 is internally gated. I'm looking for a responsive daily driven turbo for 250+awkw, with enough poke for track days and time attacks.

There is another T04S compressor kit, which may be too big for the 76 trim turbine ...

Garrett T04S upgrade kit

wheel: 61.4 / 82 / 56 trim

housing: AR70 (rated to 600hp).

Thoughts?

What you are in effect making is a GT2876R, they are a crap miss-matched turbo as the small turbine can't produce enough drive to drive the compressor wheel to full efficiency. The biggest i would go with a NS111 turbine wheel is a 71mm compressor which will give you in effect a GT2871R.

If you remember Ryan was running a GT2871R on his R33 and he was making 250 kw with stupid response. I would keep the T3 housing and buy a GT2871R CHRA and make up what Ryan was running

Garrett elude to the miss-match of the GT2876 when they state on the website;

* Best suited for unique applications such as asymmetric turbo installations

* Not recommended for general performance applications

Edited by D_Stirls
What you are in effect making is a GT2876R, they are a crap miss-matched turbo as the small turbine can't produce enough drive to drive the compressor wheel to full efficiency. The biggest i would go with a NS111 turbine wheel is a 71mm compressor which will give you in effect a GT2871R.

If you remember Ryan was running a GT2871R on his R33 and he was making 250 kw with stupid response. I would keep the T3 housing and buy a GT2871R CHRA and make up what Ryan was running

Garrett elude to the miss-match of the GT2876 when they state on the website;

Thanks for that. Now I've got a better starting point to go shopping :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...