Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Because everyone is bloody amazed. and interested :)

Nothing really to be amazed at....there are heaps better tradesmen around then me!Ive seen some a mate of mine make a panel with his hands,a hammer and a bag of sand....its absolutely amazing to watch a guy like that...very rare these days.....now thats skill!

Ok so now that the vehicles front has been removed you can see the two main upper structure bars have been left intact.These two run all the way down to the upper hinge pillar and acts as the hinge support,as you can see in the 1st pic....In the second pic you can see the sill panel has been marked for the join on the outer skin....In the 3rd pic the front is lined up to mark the outer skin join of the A pillar....In the 4th pic the front is coupled in to the Upper strusture bars/hinge pillar supports and A pillar.Lock in A thanks eddie!;)The 5th pics shows the new fronts hinge pillar holes lining up with the dowl pin/threaded part for the door hinge...looks like my mesurements were up to scratch!

in the 6th pic the bulkhead skin has taken quite a likeing to the original floor pan so in the 7th pic its screwed together to hold it in position while we check that the door gaps are true....in the 8th pic the doors are fitted and gaps are squared up ok....the next step is to weld it all back together and refit the sill strustual bars/sill panels....more on monday

Cheers

I thought someone would have something to say seeing as tho minesdatsun copped a caining...wheres my caining?

Thing is the majority of cut and shut are done to minimal cost (and care) and just to get the car "looking" like its fixed so they can stick panels back on. Then they flog it off to the first buyer they can find and somebody gets ripped off. And maybe one day in the post-mortem they examine the car and find out the reason it caved in on itself after the accident was because a cheap and shitty job was done.

Seeing as you're actually going to be driving it and have to deal with the safety consequences I'd imagine you'd be spending some time on doing a proper job :)

Hi Troy, are you going to "stiffen" it up while everything is accessible? A few well placed TIG zippers in the front end makes a heap of difference. I'd also do the A pillars, door openings, inner guards, suspension towers and particularly the firewall. We see over 200% increase in torsional stiffness by doing this and that's before we add the roll cage.

I reckon it's a few extra hours well spent.

Awesome :) Looks like is coming along well. One question though. How do you get your measurments right, surely if the two were not attatched correcty doors would not shut well etc.

Its not really that difficult,Jig companies like car-O-liner ect supply underbody measurements on almost every model vehicle available.These measurements are from certain points on the underbody so before the job starts a quick measure is taken from these points and if it doesnt measure up,we pull the car about until it does or until the doors fit on right.Then we disect the vehicle as shown.Its all at factory seams so when its pulled apart at the same part on both vehicles,you cant really mess the job up.As far as the sills and A pillars go when one is cut apart the off cut is then placed on the other half as shown i one of the pics (you can see a factory produced elongated hole on the sill where the scuff panel goes, these are a great indicating tool for marking out)

Ok...now we have the new front on and welded...the next step is to change the 2WD chassis rails to 4WD ones....the first step is to drill the spot welds off to remove the existing chassis rails...the 1st pic shows the rail removed....the second pic shows the 4WD rail siting on a trolley jack being lined up...we then clamp it on with vice grips and get underneath the vehicle with a tremel gauge and check our underbody mesurements,this is done using the main rear diff cradle mount as a base "0" mesuring point....we then have a series 7 or so underbody mesurements that run from this "0" point toward the front ,each of them are at certain holes on your chassis rail (obviously running toward the front of the vehicle)Next time your under your car,have a look on the rails and see all these holes for yourself.I should have taken a pic of the tremel gauge,i can do it and add it in later.This is a Slide rule with a tape measure built into it as you slide the tape runs up...quite a handy little jigger.After we check the underbody measurements we can move the front rail foward or backward to get it within spec.If the old sealer left on the skirts lines up perfectly to the new rail and the measurements check out square this indicates a well thought out job prior to comencing.It turns out that i must have had my thinking cap on...it fitted perfect :).The next pic shows the rail welded on and home...the next is of the right rail completed....the last pic shows the rail spot welds as seen from the inside of the vehicle...

So now the rails are fitted next we will clean up the joins and place the seam sealer and insulation mats on the floor....should i keep going on posting the process or are people bored yet?

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...