Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Posting up question for a mate.

He is running the following parts:

Balanced RB30 Crank w/ machine press fitted crank collar

Ross Harmonic Balancer

N1 Oil Pump

JPC Billet Gears

This is what it looks like after only 5000k's.

post-2140-1285644532_thumb.jpg

This siezed the motor completely. Once the oil pump was taken off it turned over.

Anyone had similair problems as this is the second set of oil pump gears that has been destroyed?

After the first time he fitted the balancer and upgraded to billet gears as he wanted to make sure it didn't do another oil pump.

Any suggestions on what could be the problem?

Cheers

Jamie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338445-oil-pump-problems-on-rb2530/
Share on other sites

what sort of balancing was done on your crank/rods and pistons?

ive had a similar problem on my first pump, which was only a standard rb25 pump, standard balancer etc.. and shattered the pump in a similar matter, only the outside ring was also broken into about 9 pieces, but my oil pump continued to work for a few weeks after the time i think i broke and use to lock up every now and then.. which could explain the outside ring being in so many pieces

i have mainly had things suggested that youve already had done.. the harmonic balancer and billet gears, aswell as very good balancing, its hard to make out but your pump seems to have the same unusual wear mine has on the inner gear where it gets driven, as well what looks like heat marks, someone suggested to me that there may not of been enough clearance between the crank collar and the oil pump drive

The last thing i have had suggested briefly that i dont understand at all, was something about checking the clearance of the block for the oil pump, i think they mean making sure that the block that the oil pump sits against is flat, but i may be wrong

hopefully we can get some experts in here with alot more experience and point us down the right direction and maybe enlighten us to anything we may of missed

Jarrod

I had the same problem with my 25/30 i had the n1 on mine and the gears let go but did not damage the housing. I now have the JPC billet gears in my pump and one of there crank collars and i have done power cruise in my car with no problems. I do know that manual cars do brake oil pumps more often then autos as there is more on/off throttle with manuals and if u do bash the limiter more often then that doesnt help the gears. The fact that you have done 2 sets of gears tells me that there must be something wrong with the balancing of the engine or the balancer my not be for a RB30.

Thanks guys, I'll pass on the suggestions.

A bit more info:

Crank was balanced by someone that has plenty of experience.

Forged pistons and rods were used.

Both pump gears and the collar were bought from JPC to avoid possible issues with collar/gear tolerances.

When the crank was pulled they checked the grub screws on the collar to make sure the collar hadn't moved.

It was all still good and hadn't moved since assembly.

I have been told that it was hard to remove from the crank and that the collar had almost fused itself to the inner gear.

  • 7 months later...

JPC gears were binned, they looked rubbish for the money and will not use or recommend them again.

Suspect problem was the collar to gear clearance. Either way when JPC supply the gears and collar together there should be no issue when used on a balanced crank.

My mate had the crank built up instead of using a collar and then rebalanced, welded collar has been built up to suit standard n1 gears by a reputable machine shop in Brisbane.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes that’s what im trying to decide. Should I do stock gtt box or enclosed or open pod. 
    • Also, I note OP is in Melbourne, which begs the question... are you aware of how illegal your car will be with a turbo, and intercooler and any sort of filter change? I don't know how you can get past the "2 intake mods" "rule" that seems to exist in Vic. Fully engineered might or might not get you there.
    • If you have a turbo... then the ducting holes I used to feed the pod are not available because your intercooler likely uses them. If you have an intercooler, your IAT's are going to be goverened by how good your intercooler setup is. I'm yet to really see anyone check IAT with a snorkel/boxed pod/proper CAI versus and unshielded pod. It would be interesting! But I suspect that the differences would not be so noticeable as if you were N/A as the intercooler is where the air is being cooled.. and out in front where the FMIC would be is a pretty good spot for it.. When I was turbo I pushed the stock GTT box as far as I could and made some pretty good power out of it, and noticed on the street I never made the same power/boost. Then I did a before and after run with a pod filter versus the box and picked up about 9PSI from the same boost duty cycle and about 50KW instantly. I never ran the stock box again, and recently removed it for my N/A setup. The box is restrictive to a degree - Even with the V8 setup I noticed I picked up power by removing the box completely, so punching holes from the bottom of it to get air from the passenger guard *helps* but the most effective one in my case was simply having the ducts, a pod, and no box around it. In my experience, *more* air was better than cold air. The air (with ducts) will be cooled off as you start moving, and especially if you start moving fast (a race track). It actually moves around quite a bit as you can see.  
    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
×
×
  • Create New...