Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

check paulr33`s FAQ and it might be in there. i think he has said b4 around 100 is where powerfc brings on the warning light unless its been changed by the tuner. ideally below 30. mine doesnt go above 20 unless i cant get 98

mine never really got over 40 from what ive noticed on the hand controller, but this batch of fuel iv noticed it hit 50, 80 a couple of times and once was 92. i still have well over half a tank of fuel left tho so i cant really just change it straight up. got a 4 hour trip to do in it this weekend and and most of that fuel will still be in it...

i always fill from the same bowser at the same servo, shell v-power

mine never really got over 40 from what ive noticed on the hand controller

You've got a hand commander, pull a few degrees timing out of it.

Go Settings, IGN/INJ, reduce the timing by say 5 degrees.

Next time you turn off and re-start it's back to where it was as these are only test settings.

or try a proper octane booster, one that works. You can substitute methanol/toluene if you know what your doing. I know methanol works, a litre in half a tank would probably fix it. Or top the tank up with E85 and have a 50/50 mix.

rolls im not sure what you mean so ill answer to the best of my ability

in low rpms in most gears the knock is very sparatic and climbs easilly over 40, iv i labor it it goes up to 90ish, but if i drop back a gear and rev it out it stays quite low.... not sure here what to do. im about to head out so ill drop 2 degrees out of it and see how it goes, realy hoping its just bad fuel :down:

I mean at what level (number) does it translate to the motor actually knocking or having preignition, obviously it isn't knocking all the time so there must be some threshold +-25% or something where it is actual preignition.

i think your a little confused. pre ignition and detonation are two different things with different causes. also theres no set number that defines knock, you can have a tiny part of the mixture knocking which generally wont do much damage or make much noise (resulting in a low knock number if everythings working properly) or you can have most of the mixture pinging which is obviously bad and would generally produce much higher knock readings. everyones opinion is different but for power fc's most people considering anything under 30-60 safe.

OP, 40 isnt very high at all, like i said either pull a couple of degrees of timing or fill the tank. 90 isnt even all that bad if its at lowish rpms.

Yes I realise they are different things but Im fairly sure a knock sensor will pick up pre ignition as well as detonation, perhaps it does only pick up the later Im not sure. Either way I thought that detonation was pretty much an all or nothing thing, either most of the mixture detonates or it doesn't, is it possible for just a tiny bit to do so?

I guess my real question is how does the scale translate to actual detonation, is there a certain amount of noise (eg 40) where there is zero detonation, and a certain amount where the entire mixture is detonating (255) obviously these would be inexact figures with large spread but I was wondering if there was any documentation by Nissan on what levels generally translate to.

apexi set the engine check light to flash at a level 60 which they believe is enough to warn you

anything over 60 i would be getting it checked by a tuner. the usual culprits when you exceed 60 knock are

too much boost

penis fuel

too much timing

intake temp too high (poor pod, poor intercooler, no intercooler, poor intake, too much boost)

fix one of those to resolve the issue and/or back out timing at the same timing

taking out timing using temp ignition adjust always removes the knocking

i pulled 8 degrees out of it and seen almost no change.... is it possible that my power fc has reset and lost its tune?

its not boost a its only low rpm driving, reving it out its fine, nothing in the intake has changed so im leaning towards fuel

if you've pulled 8 degrees with no change to knock levels then its likely its not actually knocking, possible but unlikely. could be a dud sensor or something rattling in the engine bay near the sensors

are you absolutely sure you pulled 8 degrees? set 1 of your monitor values to ign timing and see what it reads before and after changing the temp adjust

Yes I realise they are different things but Im fairly sure a knock sensor will pick up pre ignition as well as detonation, perhaps it does only pick up the later Im not sure. Either way I thought that detonation was pretty much an all or nothing thing, either most of the mixture detonates or it doesn't, is it possible for just a tiny bit to do so?

I guess my real question is how does the scale translate to actual detonation, is there a certain amount of noise (eg 40) where there is zero detonation, and a certain amount where the entire mixture is detonating (255) obviously these would be inexact figures with large spread but I was wondering if there was any documentation by Nissan on what levels generally translate to.

Knock sensors usually cant pickup pre igniton afaik as its not a metallic knock as such, more an extremely fast, high pressure burn while the pistons coming up, can melt holes in shit. suppose they might pickup a knock at the end of it as the piston reaches the top if its still burning and pings as a result of the pressure, but its fairly different to your normal pinging from too much timing.

its very possible for only a tiny bit of the mixture to ping for all sorts of reasons. poor atomisation, poor chamber design, uneven pressures, hot spots etc can all cause it.

as i said theres no set number for whats knock and what isnt. even if you know exactly whats happening in the chamber at what pressure and burn rate etc do you call it knock instead of just a clean burn? all combustion makes noise, hence why you always have some sort of knock reading when driving, i've never seen a power fc display a max of 1 after a drive. it all comes down to whats safe and what isnt, and again theres no set number and even if there was it'd be different for every engine, ecu, knock sensor etc. you can only go off other peoples and your own experience and opinions, which as i said usually equates to somewhere between 30 and 60 being the safe limit with a power fc. personally i dont even look twice at anything under 60 on my car, but i dont need it as a reliable daily and the motor is just a slapper so i'm not as careful as others might be.

each to their own

Edited by JonnoHR31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...