Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G’day all

So excited my first thread… But anyway moving right along

Just a quick question. I'm in the process of fitting my CAI and I’ve found a bizarre censor I’m not sure what it does. I had a quick cruse around the site to see if anyone else has not known what it is but I came up empty handed. It’s a black circler sensor of about 1 inch diameter that appears to be microphone or something. It’s mounted on a small tin bracket with one bolt fixing it to the chassis from inside the wheel arch.

All I want to do is relocate it but I’m a little apprehensive to if its a knock sensor or something. I haven’t got a picture but I reckon I saw some else’s setup and they’d removed the sensor. Is it safe to move? And what is it for?

Better go as its Valentines Day and I’m already being accused by my gf of having a raunchy affair with my car!! They just don’t get it…

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34231-name-that-sensor/
Share on other sites

Of the before mentioned i like the sounds of the warp drive senor... maybe i could get another!! As for the others its a 93 so no air bags and unless it had an alarm in japan its not that sides its got one of those standard nissan looking plastic clips that joins it to the wiring loom.

Thanks for the thoughts thou guys. Shouldn't matter if i relocate it to the other side of the CAP.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34231-name-that-sensor/#findComment-692523
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...