Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I actually think you have priced it spot on and I'll explain why.......

Exactly two years ago I sold a very nice black ADM (to Perth) for around $35K. It had about 175,000 kms but in excellent condition like yours.

It took me 7 months to sell and the mileage was always an issue.

Yours has another 90,000 kms on the one I sold which in my book is worth about another $8K-$10K less. 

If we deduct that of what I sold mine for we would land in the high $20K region.

We all understand that during R32 GT-R's in general have increased in value approx 50% over the last 2 years and increasing, they have nowhere near peaked. 

When you do the sums, low to mid $40K's is about right.

With all that said, you will either get knock over in the rush and sell it immediately or suffer the same issue I had where collectors just won't buy a high milage car.

An enthusiast would probably prefer a lot lower milage JDM for similar money

It is probably easier to find a buyer at $100K with a sub 60,000 kms ADM car.

Regardless, it presents lovely in the pic you posted and a credit to all the owners in keeping it factory original considering all the useage it has had.

Good luck wit the sale, please keep us informed.

Cheers,

Bob.

Yes wasnt happy with the front bumper and mirrors from previous owner so i had them painted other wise just some hand polish. I have enjoyed the 4 years that i have had it for and now time to buy something old and restore/modify build up and get that satisfaction of doing it yourself ( and getting help from my 2 girls ).

20 hours ago, Aussie_Delivered_R32_GTR said:

With all that said, you will either get knock over in the rush and sell it immediately or suffer the same issue I had where collectors just won't buy a high milage car.......Cheers......Bob.

 

5 minutes ago, nizpwr said:

Deposit taken for car.

Thanks again everyone for insight/feedback regards to my beast 

Guess I was kinda right......... Congrats on the sale.... Bob.

10 minutes ago, Zapman said:

Hi all,

I have recently purchased an Adm. Vin ending with 16098. Would love to know abit of history regarding this car.

Thanks 

Welcolm...... Based on that it's build #32, Black.

I don't have any other info.

Can you please advise when did you buy it, from where, milage?

Are you Sydney based?

Photos?

Any info may help to jog peoples memory.

Thanks,

Bob.

35 minutes ago, Zapman said:

Yes mate. Came from Queensland 

Yeah.... The gold badges were the unique give-away.

The milage surprises me though. It was advertised with about 148,000kms then (18 months ago).

I know it took forever to sell (as did mine at the time) so maybe the mileage creeped up in time.

Anyway good luck with the resto and if you need a hand with anything or would like to catch up for some pointers, please drop me a PM.

Cheers,

Bob.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...