Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I bought a r32 gtr and always thought it was too laggy for stock turbos but after checking everything i could think of just decided thats how it was.

I bought a power fc, adjustable cam gears, boost controller and took it to a dyno tuner that was very highly recommended where he informs me that this is not normal so after a full day of him checking everything its making 200awkw on 12 psi which is apparently about right but it doesnt make full boost til after 5,500 rpm it just builds up slowly

Has anyone heard of this? cam timing has been down by the marks and the amount of teeth on the belt, no vacuum boost leaks, turbo actuators have heaps of pressure on them, i have inspected the compressor wheels on the turbos, swapped intercoolers, air filters arent restrictive, really the next thing is to inspect the exhaust wheels and the flaps to make sure they are sealing but because thats not a fun job i thought id see if anyone else has come across this problem and my tuner has never had this happen before

Standard turbos, standard manifolds (no exhaust leaks) im assuming just no brand stainless dump pipes the kind that seperate the wastegate from the exhaust and the plumb back in (which im not a fan of)

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/344982-unusual-lag-problem/
Share on other sites

Since it's a 32, it's possible you have the 32 Nismo turbos, steel wheel and the laggiest of all the garrett turbos with steel wheels. Even with them though full boost at 5500rpm, should be seeing full boost much earlier maybe about 4000rpm instead if you indeed had them.

Have another play with the inlet cam timing. My mates was doin the same thing and adjusting the inlet cam netted a much better response. About 800rpm difference.

This was with 32 nismo turbos.

His was the same 5500, now 4700rpm and makes 300kw on 19psi

well im pretty sure i didnt have any and the tuner checked too, once it gets to 12 it holds it fine? isnt it still laggy for n1s? and shouldnt it of made more power? i guess the engine could be tired

thanks for everyone input

The fact that it holds 12psi doesnt mean that its not a boost leak, the turbo/s are just working much harder to keep it at 12psi. Mine ran exactly the same boost pressure just took longer to get there for the turbos to overcome the leak. If it was a huge leak then yeah maybe it wouldnt be able to hold 12psi but a smaller leak would.

Can be hard to hear especially if its while the engine is running. I just blocked off the pipe running into the engine and made up a fitting with pvc pipe and used a hand pump to pump air into the system. Was super easy to hear where its leaking out cause there are no other noises. Cost me $20 for a hand pump and $6 for 2 pvc caps.

Might have to compression test it, kind of been putting it off because then i might have to rebuild it! makes sense harey ill give it a go, easier than taking the dump pipes off to check if the flaps are sealing which is all i could think of to do next!

cheers guys

You could also try removing the boost signal to the actuators and give it a very careful run to see if they spool earlier. Boost will keep rising so shut it down as soon as you see boost build so you dont blow the turbos. If they are truly stock turbos you'd want to make sure you didn't push it past 3000rpm. If you're at 4000rpm with still no boost then you can be certain its not a boost controller problem.

My first R32 had a "Hiclone" installed in the intake pipe making it much harder for the engine to breathe and consequently made the car feel very laggy. Once removed it behaved normally. A similar restriction somewhere from the air filters to the intake plenum would cause this problem. Your intercooler is not partially blocked? If you really wanted to get technical you could measure the pressure drop across the intake system.

ive tried another intercooler and lower piping and had the other piping off but i have never heard of a hiclone! one thing is the afms are reading around the same volatge so each turbo should be sucking the same amount of air which is swinging me towards a boostleak/restriction

  • 2 weeks later...

taking vacuum lines off actuators didnt make any difference, i did end up having a inlet manifold gasket gone but that hasnt fixed it. replaced anything thsat looked even half dodgy (hoses etc) still no better!

thinking it has to be turbo related? funny thing is the afm reading is around the same

taking vacuum lines off actuators didnt make any difference, i did end up having a inlet manifold gasket gone but that hasnt fixed it. replaced anything thsat looked even half dodgy (hoses etc) still no better!

thinking it has to be turbo related? funny thing is the afm reading is around the same

remove the cat wire up rest of exhaurst and take for a run around the block, it will be very loud but will remove any possible restriction in exhaurst and help rule out exhaurst, split dumps are better

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...