Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb34 On Sale

sleeperdatto

By sleeperdatto,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
Posted (edited)

Very good improvement over the RB30 and you would assume that kind of improvement between a RB30 and a RB26...

Must be a issue some kind of other issue with the car though as boost seems incredibly lazy for a 3.4L with a T04Z, we see similar results from 2.6L :thumbsup:

Edited by SimonR32
zebra Grand Master

zebra

Posted
Posted
You are very naive to think that!

Why?

Every T04Z setup i have seen, whether it is on a RB20 or a 3.4L 2J has always been lazy.

The wheel design hasn't changed since the 1970s Garrett T67, all they have done is add a ball bearing cartridge, and some fancy anti surge holes.

Simonster Proficient

Simonster

Posted
Posted
that is really nice! but its an expencive 250rpm gain in response and 35hp

Nice, someone that only looks at the final power figure. :)

3500 its up 50hp 4000 its up about 130hp 4500 it's up about ~70hp. i'll take that any day of the week, would be a massive improvement on the road.

Looking forward to a torque graph!!

zebra Grand Master

zebra

Posted
Posted

I think more head work would help, no doubt with the extra 400cc the ports will need to be bigger.

I doubt sticking a 3.4L bottom end in a car with stock cams and ports will net good results, Would make a good low rpm streeter, but to get the most out of it will require a heavily ported head with very large cams.

I still want to know the rod length and pin height, My guess is the rods are around the 5.8-5.9" mark (maybe standard 25/26 length?), I dont think there is room to raise the pin heights for standard 6" rods and a 9mm stroke increase

Harey Veteran

Harey

Posted
Posted
that is really nice! but its an expencive 250rpm gain in response and 35hp

Its at least a 350rpm gain in response when I look at it. As said the hp gain is a lot more in the mid range.

Agree about headwork required to get the most out of the extra capacity.

To me the only really negative to a skyline is the lack of low down torque when still demanding good top end power. This is getting closer to having the best of both worlds and a worthy quest in my opinion.

STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted
Very good improvement over the RB30 and you would assume that kind of improvement between a RB30 and a RB26...

Must be a issue some kind of other issue with the car though as boost seems incredibly lazy for a 3.4L with a T04Z, we see similar results from 2.6L ;)

Not a chance a 2.6 and t04z (pump) is never even close to that unless its running a bullshit ramp rate.

a genuine 454rwkw and 4000-4400 full boost threshold is a pipe dream for a 2.6 litre, i reckon a tighter gate spring or an adjustment in preload (jap gates have the preload / travel limiter) would have it on full song @ 4000.

i had a T78 with the same curve and we kept winding in the gate pre-load until it ramped to full boost without the slight curve.

yogibear Community Regular

yogibear

Posted
Posted
Not a chance a 2.6 and t04z is never even close to that unless its running a bullshit ramp rate.

a genuine 454rwkw and 4000-4400 full boost threshold is a pipe dream for a 2.6 litre, i reckon a tighter gate spring or an adjustment in preload (jap gates have the preload / travel limiter) would have it on full song @ 4000.

i had a T78 with the same curve and we kept winding in the gate pre-load until it ramped to full boost without the slight curve.

2 questions about that

1 did it still regulate boost properly ?

2 did this make it come on faster or just make boost come on a different way?

thanks

STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted
2 questions about that

1 did it still regulate boost properly ?

2 did this make it come on faster or just make boost come on a different way?

thanks

based on the graph on the previous page i would say it would be worth about 50hp @ 4250rpm.. not bad for free

bigmikespec Veteran

bigmikespec

Posted
Posted
Not a chance a 2.6 and t04z is never even close to that unless its running a bullshit ramp rate.

a genuine 454rwkw and 4000-4400 full boost threshold is a pipe dream for a 2.6 litre, i reckon a tighter gate spring or an adjustment in preload (jap gates have the preload / travel limiter) would have it on full song @ 4000.

Waits for SimonR32 to reply...

SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
Posted (edited)
Not a chance a 2.6 and t04z (pump) is never even close to that unless its running a bullshit ramp rate.

a genuine 454rwkw and 4000-4400 full boost threshold is a pipe dream for a 2.6 litre, i reckon a tighter gate spring or an adjustment in preload (jap gates have the preload / travel limiter) would have it on full song @ 4000.

i had a T78 with the same curve and we kept winding in the gate pre-load until it ramped to full boost without the slight curve.

Wait, what?!?

l_b7eca4ab19da63cf98eae41ae9b99bfc.jpg

13065_226473479702_508809702_4240776_6507335_n.jpg

Also have another graph with 467rwkw that overlays the first graph untill it carrys away top end...

I do agree through that a harder boost ramp would be a huge improvement :D

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • CF.Panda
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By CF.Panda · Posted

      AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • AnimalGarage
      spot the stagea

      By AnimalGarage · Posted

      It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...