Jump to content
SAU Community

just took my car to the dyno

JAMESW

By JAMESW,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Genesis® Grand Master

Genesis®

Posted
Posted

Hey James,

better get used to it :wave:. I had mine dynoed 3 weeks ago and got 105kws as well. I have got the same engine as yourself in a R32 and its factory fitted.

however, the mods i had are:

pod filter modified to front bar

cat back 2 1/4 inch exhaust.

engine oil: Mobil 1

gearbox + diff oil: redline

it was a 36 degrees hot morning when i had the 3 runs and the consolation i had was that all 3 runs show consistent results at 105kws and at least i know that the car is running well and not clutch slipping or anything. btw, my dyno was done at 3rd gear and was pushed to 120km/h.

i also read somewhere that the results varies on different dyno, usually in the plus & minus of 5 kws region.

glenn

Safra Apprentice

Safra

Posted
Posted
when my car was n/a i got 96rwkw with 2.5" exhaust thats it, so i think yours is realistic enough

hey doxximus,

do you miss the N/A burble or are you more than compensated by the extra power.

i want the power but i seriously love the sound of my car under full noise(despite the neighbours)

rod

skyla Community Regular

skyla

Posted
Posted

Last time I had mine on the dyno I got 112kw, that was a 4th gear dyno.

Mods to my car K&N panel filter, 2 1/2" exhaust, extractors.

When it was auto it got 100kw.

Other NA's on the same dyno run between 94 to 105kw, with similar mods.

Greg Veteran

Greg

Posted
Posted

James i wouldn't be too disappointed with your result! :D What exactly does the unichip do (ie what does it adjust/change)?

With extractors, 2.5" cat back exhaust system and pod i only got 81rwkw (graph attached), that was at the dyno day _turtle_ mentioned. I think the reason all of our results from that day were so low is because we dynoed in 4th gear (top speed 180).

Have u looked at fitting a s-afc, or does the unichip adjust the air fuel ratios to an optimal level??

Cheers,

Greg

AutoTrust Mentor

AutoTrust

Posted
Posted

The uni-chip offers the same ranges of adjustment as many aftermarket computers, and Dynomotive are the best at tuning uni-chip systems in my opinion. Experiance counts foe everything in the tuning game.

Ryno Experienced

Ryno

Posted
Posted

Mine got 94 rwkw, in forth gear

Mods: Kobe extractors, and 2 1/2 inch exhaust

That was with a stock air filter, so it might have been stuggling to get enough air.

The new engine is in the car and should be run on the dyno this friday, I'll let you guys know the improvement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      lol, probably should have read further!
    • R32 TT
      33 GTR Broken front wheel knuckle

      By R32 TT · Posted

      Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...