Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In my humble opinion if you tune your 3lt to make peak torque across the entire rpm range it will be a much more difficult car to drive, the sheer amount of torque that the three litre can develop at 3000/4800 rpm in an area where the boost is rapidly rising to target wastegate pressure will break the tyre contact patch, assuming your car is not FBW throttle then timing and boost are the only means of controling the power in the mid range. To tune to peak torque above this area and maintain peak torque for as long as possible is the key to tunning any engine.

Look to making modifications to the rear geometry as even the 33 has way to much anti squat in the rear to work with radial r tyre, which will make putting any more than 380rwkw to the ground through a radial challenging.

In my 32 it is a faster car with 490rwk even at a tight circuit like baskerville, as long as the power is controllable and follows throttle request (well as well as you could expect a turbo car to). There are large gains to be had in FBW throttle mapping getting rid of all waste throttle, ie only requesting 40% of plate opening if peak torque can be generated at this opening as this means a pedal reduction of 2% yeilds a reduction of horse power, increasing actual fly opening as rpm increases allways only requesting the min value to net max engine power at given rpm. Gear dependant boost pressure will also help and the holinger and quieff boxes have a voltage output making setting this function up very straight foward. cheers brad

hollinger, + setting up the fly by wire throttle + ECU to run it etc

true you wont do what youve stated above for 30k if your buying new parts and paying someone to do any part oif it , tunning, install etc. What else other than a quaffe/holinger can you poke 420rwkwrwk through without it turning inside out in a race car if the car setup to put it to the ground.

Jerico 4 or 5 speed road race box? Im surprised no one really runs these in Aus. I got rough figures of about $6500 for a 4 speed and ~$8000 for a 5 speed for an 800hp capable box when I looked into it. Edit: With a bellhousing. Oh, and the shifter mechanism will probably necessitate some cutting.

Edited by irokin

A mate has a 5 speed jerico in an FG XR8 that he uses for weekend warrior duties.

The initial cost of the transmission was okay, the bellhousing, clutch, flywheel, thrust bearing, tailshaft, selector and startermotor was the cost killer.

The total conversion set him back more than what an older H6S would have, now planning to remove it and I've ordered a brand new RD6 for him.

The jeri was good to use but the cost of maintaining it has proven to be expensive when it requires parts, so the hollinger is a better option.

For sprints, where you are only allowed to pass on the straight, punch out of the corners is particularly important, you need to get past that slowbie you have been following ASAP and corner exit acceleration will do that for you. With my gearbox and diff an effective rev range of from 4000 to 7000 is required so it has to be well on boost and making good power at 4000 but not run out of puff past say 6000.

So it's not how much power is needed, it's what setup will give me a suitable and highest power spread possible. Makes the car nice to drive too which helps lap times as well.

There are large gains to be had in FBW throttle mapping getting rid of all waste throttle, ie only requesting 40% of plate opening if peak torque can be generated at this opening as this means a pedal reduction of 2% yeilds a reduction of horse power, increasing actual fly opening as rpm increases allways only requesting the min value to net max engine power at given rpm. Gear dependant boost pressure will also help and the holinger and quieff boxes have a voltage output making setting this function up very straight foward. cheers brad

Would a cheaper alternative be 4d boost mapping with TPS vs boost and a Speed vs Boost map?

Edited by Super_Dude

Would a cheaper alternative be 4d boost mapping with TPS vs boost and a Speed vs Boost map?

would be one way of doing it for sure, means running ignition cut for traction control though which is pretty hard on the engine if its on a percentage of cut for the majority of the lap. would be difficult to map due to constantly changing grip levels, maybe you could swing a 9 position trim of a gain compensation to vary it like we do to ulter the target slip percentage and rate in which throttle is slammed shut on slip break out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's a boring history lesson on number plates People want illegal spacing to make their plate more readable, if mine was J2X BK, anyone who knows about the car would see that its spelling JZX. Years ago third party plate manufacturers could alter the text to make it look like something else, nowadays the computer software is locks that ability (well, ours does at work) Up until 2001 the first letter of a number plate represented the year of the vehicle, for example A would be 1983. (pre 1983, the format was backwards, so the year letter was on the end). Followed by 3 random numbers and 3 random letters. Things started to get complicated at the end of the 90s where T and V were 1999, W and X were 2000 and Y was early 2001. From 2001 they introduced a new 'layout' where the first two characters are letters, this represented where that vehicle was first registered in the country. The letters corrosponded to a region in the country. Some regions had a large number of codes, where as some only had a couple (despite being large in physical land size) Next are 2 numbers to indicate 2000s. So it went from: Y (March 1999 > Aug 2000) 51 (Sept 2001 > Feb 2002) 02 (March 2002 > Aug 2002) 52 (Sept 2002 > Feb 2003) etc etc When the 2010s got here, the numbers changed again, going up by tens 10 (March 2010 > Aug 2010) 60 (Sept 2010 > Feb 2011) When the 2020s arrived it went to 20 (March 2020 > Aug 2020) 70 (Sept 2020 > Feb 2021) etc As for personalised plates, you're not allowed a registration that makes the vehicle look newer. Take my 110 for example, its a 2004 car so I can have any available plate upto 04. I can't have a 54 because it was manufactured in August 2004. Which allows me to have a J plate, because its older (if that makes sense)    
    • Mount some of these on your dash? https://www.greddy.com/products/16001720  
    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
×
×
  • Create New...