Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Same thing I thought incidentally with 600rwkw dyno pony...

Put a GT35 on it, then there would be interesting... If you can keep it pointed in the general direction of forward of course :D

It will have weight advantage on it's side though to be fair. It's a SL or similar so IIRC they are around 1250-1280 stock which isn't bad. Final weight would be interesting with the heavy Ford 9" but reduced fuel tank etc.

Didnt notice the 9" part.

LOL 9" diff in a VL that is a "circuit car" and not a drag car

Did some google, looks to have some sort of 4 link in the back but thats about it...Cant find any real details about from "it makes 11ty horsepowers"

Variety is the spice of life!

Good to see more than just a bunch of evo, wrx and gtr's going around.

That said, I don't think it will set any records. If it adds aero and some good sized rubber, it could be reasonably quick.

At a recent supersprint at EC, the old Larry Perkins VL Group A racecar reeled off a 1:48, so I would expect this VL to be similiar and perhaps a bit quicker. 1:45's?

I say 10 :)

At least the ba had v8 supercar suspension.

And tyres they are twice as wide lol.

I did notice in the pics the VL is on full slicks...might be even more intersing once he throws some semis on it.

Standard VL guards are tiny....he would be lucky if he could get 235's under it at that ride height

Googled him:

Street Commodores says, "Jason is currently fitting up his 12in wide ROH wheels and mid-way through a wide-body conversion to help the car in the aerodynamics and traction department"

And on calaisturbo the owner said it's "1380kg with driver before the nine inch, so bloody heavy with that in". He also said he hasn't driven it with this engine/power or on semis.

I couldn't find any times for the car except drag and dyno results.

What do people think about this entry? Absolutely flying at Mallala recently and with more power and room to wind up it should be quick!

http://www.worldtimeattack.com/index.php/open-class-team-toyomorpowa-dyno/

Simon-1.jpg

Also has too much horsepower to be useable.

Look at the Pro Class cars, with the Exeption ofMark Berry and Lofty most of the quick cars had around 550hp give or take.

No need for 800hp circuit cars...espesially RWD ones.

Sold the car

Really?

Was only talking to him and is was sitting in the shed not that long ago. They decided to give WTAC a miss this year.

Lofty is a busy boy playing with his stupid fast Toyota Starlet in IPRA atm which does 42's around the creek with a restrictor :thanks:

Really?

Was only talking to him and is was sitting in the shed not that long ago. They decided to give WTAC a miss this year.

Lofty is a busy boy playing with his stupid fast Toyota Starlet in IPRA atm which does 42's around the creek with a restrictor :thanks:

Oh...I thought he sold it...was for sale then the ad was gone from my105.

my bad

42s for an IPRA car is fkn flying!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...