Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol..i had 460rwkw, a live rear axle and 17 inch 275 drag radials, and still looked out the side window to drive on full throttle at anything under 170-180ish km.

I had to fit 26x8.5 15 inch cheater slicks(et street rags) to make it safe and drive straight.

cheers

darren

Lol, that made me laugh. Good perspective on it though :)

And yes, a bigger turbo wouldnt go astray seeing as how E85 isnt really accessible for me :glare: , hence why I was steering towards the GTX3582R . Money isnt necessarily an issue.. And I havent factored building the engine yet, but I'm guessing around the $3.5K - $5k mark? I'm not really sure as I've never had to build a motor though..:blush:

That larger Kando turbo that was linked from ebay could look promising.. I wonder if that would get to, or push over the 350rwkw mark on 98? Hmm..

you obviously missed my post...if they are pushing 300kw at 18psi on 98 , 350kw at 25 psi should be easy...and thats the T67..

I just went back and had a look; seems I did miss it :) .. Getting slack in my old age (lol.) :rolleyes:

Fair enough, I was just under the impression that 300rwkw - 330rwkw was heading towards its limit on 98. Might have to go back through the thread and do a bit more reading :thumbsup:

And I guess the extra $2k saved can go elsewhere.. Like maybe a spare T67 when it decides to throw a turbine wheel out the exhaust ;) ; just kidding.

you obviously missed my post...if they are pushing 300kw at 18psi on 98 , 350kw at 25 psi should be easy...and thats the T67..

Just to clarify I'm unsure what psi the car ran to make 300kw on 98 with the t67....

I do know that on e85 at 18psi it made 330ish....

Just to clarify I'm unsure what psi the car ran to make 300kw on 98 with the t67....

I do know that on e85 at 18psi it made 330ish....

Could a reasonable guess-tamation be that figure, minus 7% - 10%? as the difference between 98 and E85 (from the results I've seen anyway..) have generally been no more than 10%.

oh, :blush:

I still think with some headwork and cams it could do it..

so just to clarify (and cover my ass) Im not saying you should buy it, just that I think it could do it..

If moneys no object id probably get the garrett :D

Lmao. :rofl:

I might've already missed it; but has anyone seen or have a compressor map for the T67? It'd give a rough idea of the upper limits of boost it could run efficiently, then maybe pushing 2 Bar could be enough?

The GTX3582R would be very tasty to have; but last night I started to have second thoughts on it. Perhaps its being a little too excessive lol. Maybe a T67 with the 12cm housing could push over 350rwkw? Guess I'll have to take the plunge and find out haha.

I did alot of searching a while back and I think the biggest result on 98 I found was 330 on something like 25 psi... full built motor and cams...

Was that the T67 with the 10cm housing, or the higher rated 12cm housing? Surely these turbos would be able to push a bit more boost than that efficiently? (taking into account the fact that all necessary knock-reducing parts have been used..)

*sigh*

You need a TD06SH-25G. Throwing a bigger housing on the T67 wont do the job (IMO) The bigger turbine will help make the 350rwkws you want. I know of a TD06SH-25G with 10cm housing; powered car that on an RB25 with baby cams and a Greddy plenum made 345rwkws on pump fuel no fuss at 20psi

I think the last word you can use with the T67 turbo is dissapointing! We are talking about a turbo that has slightly less response than a 3076 and able to make more top end. Yes it is in a different category to the GT35, less top end but a lot less lag as well.

You need a TD06SH-25G. Throwing a bigger housing on the T67 wont do the job (IMO) The bigger turbine will help make the 350rwkws you want. I know of a TD06SH-25G with 10cm housing; powered car that on an RB25 with baby cams and a Greddy plenum made 345rwkws on pump fuel no fuss at 20psi

Any idea on when it hit full boost?

You need a TD06SH-25G. Throwing a bigger housing on the T67 wont do the job (IMO) The bigger turbine will help make the 350rwkws you want. I know of a TD06SH-25G with 10cm housing; powered car that on an RB25 with baby cams and a Greddy plenum made 345rwkws on pump fuel no fuss at 20psi

Yeah, I agree with Roy... The bigger rear would make the power a little more easier :)

Saying that I think I've pretty much maxed the 25g compressor making 390kw at the hubs aka 360rwkw

lol..i had 460rwkw, a live rear axle and 17 inch 275 drag radials, and still looked out the side window to drive on full throttle at anything under 170-180ish km.

I had to fit 26x8.5 15 inch cheater slicks(et street rags) to make it safe and drive straight.

cheers

darren

Link to build thread? Sounds like a mean 31

Yeah, I agree with Roy... The bigger rear would make the power a little more easier :)

Saying that I think I've pretty much maxed the 25g compressor making 390kw at the hubs aka 360rwkw

what boost you at Simon, cant seem to find it anywhere

Lmao. :rofl:

I might've already missed it; but has anyone seen or have a compressor map for the T67? It'd give a rough idea of the upper limits of boost it could run efficiently, then maybe pushing 2 Bar could be enough?

The GTX3582R would be very tasty to have; but last night I started to have second thoughts on it. Perhaps its being a little too excessive lol. Maybe a T67 with the 12cm housing could push over 350rwkw? Guess I'll have to take the plunge and find out haha.

In all honesty man, while i don't claim to be the worlds foremost expert on RB25's, i have driven and seen plenty modified. I think you are asking a lot

for a 2.5l motor really, They can only swallow so much air before you have to make them a "pig" with to big of a turbo to be any real fun.

My advice is stick to 300-350rwkw E85 depending..or build a 3.0 bottom end....

cheers

darren

Why does everyone desire the L2? I run the normal TD06 and on the same dyno with the same tuner my car make .5rwkws more and was a tad more responsive. So probably more to do with being a tad healthier engine, smaller diam wheel ?! But point is there was no real difference in performance on an RB20, and it seems the plain TD06 wheel flows a bit more then the L2 wheel. So makes me think on an RB25 you would not want the L2 wheel with anything less then a 10cm housing

Putting things into perspective.. L2 wheel = T67 with TD07 shaft diameter = same shit, different smell.

Ill put it down to my logic. SR20 w/TD06SL2 20G 8cm makes very respectable numbers and response. Simon has proven the same rear wheel with a tiny 10cm housing can flow substantial numbers, in his own words he has maxed his 25G (note 78mm) compressor. His exhaust side is not choking nor holding him back.

Move the said turbo from the SR to the RB and you can only spool faster, right? Go up from an 8cm housing to a 10cm housing and you may just accommodate for that 25% displacement and utilise the 20g across most of your power band. The 10cm is still a small .73AR housing, so I anticipate it will not hinder its character from what the 8cm had to offer.

Honestly, SR L2 20g plots well against a 3076R RB25 IMHO. How can I not find it an attractive offer to utilise the same on a bigger motor?

Anyway, I should have my TD06SL2 20g by the end of the week, as should another member who I am not sure if hes advertised it yet. So we shall see just what the hype is about, or perhaps not. Hey its anybodies game!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
×
×
  • Create New...