Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah thats does sound like a winner. Ill see if i can bend it around enough.

Yeah its one of the ebay ones. I got mine made up with 44mm piping for the wastegate, this makes things very close. Over all it is a good quality item.

Yeah either looping the two sources or blocking both would work fine. Going to a bolt shop and buying the right bolt would be good, make sure its short.

As for the antisurge compressor housing, id say turf it and get a non drilled one (based on Dori's results)

and re the gate position i say cut and re work your own pipe... leaving that pipe there blanked and putting the gate off the housing is a little ugly

Ok no way its gonna bend that far around.

I will buy 2 shorter bolts one on the block with 1 copper washer. and the other one with a nut and 2 washers done up tight should do the job.

I will email the guy now about getting the correct housing

Edited by Crans

Got my T67 today and have a few questions.

It came with a 4" Anti surge compressor housing which i did not want i wanted a standard 4" Compressor housing. Will this matter that much?

What is the best way to block the water lines? The shorter of the 2 (Water return??) I was simply going to find a bolt wth the same pattern but shorter and bolt it in nice and tight with a coper washer.

Not sure what to do with the one that goes around the back of the block should i just cut it off shorter and fix a blocked off bit of hose on the other side? Or blank it off at the source, which im guessing is under the plenum?

Any help is appriciated keen to get her back together, tonight i have connected oil feed(One supplied with the turbo is a bit long) and return. Finished replacing exhaust manifold studds.

Also I have one of those NZ manifolds and i am not happy with the way the wastegate pipe comes out it is really really close to the body and air con lines.

Should i modify this pipe or just blank it off and run the gate off the turbin housing?

Have you got the ebay link to where you purchased it from?

Edited by SimonR32

I didn't mean bend it, I mean use a hose to join the 2 ports..so you keep the original coolant flow happening but you bypass the turbo..othrwise your pushing coolant down a dead end

Anyway no mind I'm sure you will work it all out :thumbsup:

I'd imagine once it's sent you will be blocked too haha

Yep. I finally got a response today from him about buying some fittings. He said he automatically had it set to throw any emails from me to rubbish and block me from eBay after complaining about a wrong part sent. great customer service skills.

okay so i've been thinking and the td06 is the way to go on the rb20 basically for more fun,

ive been looking at

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Non-AntiSurge-TD06SL2-20G-w-T3-10cm-V-Band-Housing-/280901075627?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item41670242ab#ht_2715wt_1198

and

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/2-4-A-R55-Kinugawa-Turbocharger-TD06SL2-18G-T3-8cm-AR61-External-Gated-V-Band-/280906865889?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item41675a9ce1#ht_2564wt_1198

i know the first one is the most common of the 2 and will be pretty laggy on the 20 (full boost by 4 - 4.5k)

but will the 2nd one be much different (going on the AR and wheel size?)

im trying to go for the nothing for a bit then bang! instant power thing, which of these or another am i looking for?

key things i dont want a anti surge garbo housing and i would like full boost by around as close to 4k as possible.

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
    • Here's Logans Silvia with R32 Drivetrain, mine will be slightly lower (more angle). He was constantly blowing the RH axles at around 16deg. I want to avoid this.    
×
×
  • Create New...