Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The guy who posted just before your post has put a TD05H 18G 8cm on his RB20 and is soon to get it tuned.

He had a TD06H 20G before and he said its 'definitely more punchy'. you can see that right above your post, if you would so graciously read the thread lol.

as for a TD05H 20G thats not a known good combo. It will have the lag of a bigger turbo without the power. If you want more power than what the 18G can offer (say 240) then get yourself a TD06SL2 20G.

has anyone put either of the td05 18g or the td05 20g on there rb20s yet?

i have read that theve been put on the rb25s and have good response but what are they looking like on the rb20 with response and drift??

Will let you know on here later in the week, I have just installed a TD05H-18G extenal gate 3" antisurge on my rb20. Went External gate as we have had 3 kandos seize the internal wastegates shut and overboost. So Id stay away from them for sure.

went the 18g as all i read on the 18 and 20 was that the 20 made couple of extra kw in the top but lost a lot more low/mid. And compared wheel sizes to that of garrets and the 18g is only slighty by a bees dick larger than a 2871 which would be a perfect turbo for a rb20. and from memory the 20 was close to a 2876 which is a fair old mismatch of wheel sizes and have seen these to be very laggy.

I plumed the a turbosmart 45mm gate into the exh housing of the turbo, and ran a long gate pipe thate curls under the dump pipe so it all fits under a factory 25 heatshiled and cut the 3 bolt flange off a 25 comp cover and welded it to the comp out let to run the factory elbow. ( Road registerd drift car dont want to hae to pay to put it turough emmisions testing)

If you want to run this turbo on the stock manafold in the factroy compressor discharge angle you will need to run a spacer plate between the manafold and turbo, im running 12mm one and the comp housing is touching the maafold heatsheild, but my old vg30 one did the same.

Thanks for all that info.

I have a top mount t04e lag monster at the moment so i would like to change. I have been looking to this style of setup for a while but i think ill stay top mount and try get good results. Ill prob loose spool time by 300rpm because of top mount but ay i dont mind.

Murph - keen to hear what numbers you get. What supporting mods?

TD05-18G is good if you not wanting massive numbers 250-260+ and not wanting to loose too much lag.

Can anyone suggest a good plug gap for 22psi? Or just gap a little, then test drive unitil no more miss up high at WOT?

Hypergear's looking for a tester for their billet TD05H for a dirt cheap deal. be interested to see their version of TD05 compare to a standard version. seeing their result of billet TD06SL2 and T67 it should be following the same tread.

Murph - keen to hear what numbers you get. What supporting mods?

TD05-18G is good if you not wanting massive numbers 250-260+ and not wanting to loose too much lag.

Can anyone suggest a good plug gap for 22psi? Or just gap a little, then test drive unitil no more miss up high at WOT?

yeah Im not aiming for high figures, I just wanted a relyable turbo which isnt much laggier than the old VG30 i had on previously.

response is more important for me as the car is a drift car. Last G1 comp I managed 2nd in div 2 with 150 rwkw on a stock 20 turbo. Conceded the final as I lost the exh wheel in the 2nd lap of top 4.

Yeah basically I was after a new turbo not a unknown 2nd junk, as my car has to be relyable. If I get 220 ish Ill be happy, Ill see how much injector duty i get up to if im not too high, Im planning on runnig 10% methanol to see if it can take some more mid range timing to get it on as early as possible.

mods are

metal head gasket arp studs, recoed head, tomei oil restricors, drilled out oil drains in head to 9.5 mm celaned up oil drains in rear of head, 6 chamber oil air separator tank draing to sump, extenal sump to rcr cover drain/vent. gtr injectors, split fires, nistune, 600x300x100 twin pass intercooler. 3" exh. Kelford 258 deg cams 8.7 lift ( from memory) cam gears, oil cooler, direct drive billet hub fan with gk teck fan (not runnign a viscos couple)

Os twinplate 25box

prob more shit i cant remember but for a 20 its got a fair bit of fruit

Also it gets tuned on a Mainline dyno, so figures are genrally lower than some other dynos.

Will be gettign it tuned either tomoro or thurs so ill keep posted

What boost you planning to run? I made 213rwkw @ 14psi, unopened, td06 (shitty i/gate) walbro, 550's, cooler, exhaust + nistune. Expecting 240ish with 20-22psi with the td05-18g 3" anti.

Scott - Have 0.8 gap already. Have swapped OEM coils for Supersparks (shhh were cheap), so could it be ignitor related as it was doing the same with the OEM coils..

Try change the coil harness mate, they can cause all sorts of havoc.

Make sure you have adequate earthing at the igniter and to the head. There is a strap from the stock coil harness to the firewall also IIRC and that needs to be sufficiently earthed too.

Ahhh yes. I replaced the harness as my connectors where starting to break. Funny you say firewall, my ignitor is earthed to one of the valley cover bolts?? And the harness is earthed to the last coil pack "frame" mounting bolt??

Do they seem like OEM positions? I have no issues making addition earthing connections myself if you think it will help.

They are definitely not the OEM position...

And they are relying on the motors ability to earth which it would probably have one single strap bolted onto the thermostat housing or similar. Which then goes through alloy to cast iron and back to alloy through layers of gasket goop and mainly relies on the bolts holding it together to earth.

100% you should do up an earth kit and have good earthing to the body AND multiple points on the motor. Make sure your earths are NOT secured to painted surfaces or there will be limited conductivity.

Well ran mine up last wed, and ended up spending the night chasing a missfire issue. Havent sorted it out yet

didnt get a constitant run out of it but had 12 lb boost in it by 3400 rpm and over all response very similar to the vg30 seen did make 226kw probably more in it, but yeah still trying to sort the miss fire issue before can tune properly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...