Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey forum.

Need some food for thought, I'm trying to weigh up the pros and cons of internal vs external gates.

Problem is, I can't get my boost to ramp up quickly enough, without then creeping up from there. The best I can get is 10psi by just under 3k RPM - which is pretty lazy IMO (.86 disco potato on 2.5L QR25), then slight creep, but any less pretension and it doesn't make 10psi, and more and it makes more boost and creeps more. I've tried boost controller or not, a .5 and 1.0 bar actuator (using .5 bar one now), different pretensions etc... I have two options: put up with the internal gate, or hold the internal gate shut and install an external gate (the manifold I'm using has provisions for the external gate).

Assuming all other variables are the same, what are the general pros and cons of the two types? The way I see it:

External

pros

-finer, more accurate boost control

-boost ramps harder

-better turbine flow

cons

-expensive

-space consuming

-complex (more plumbing, space constraints etc.)

Internal

pros

-cheap

-simple

cons

-prone to creep

-prone to fading (boost dropping off at high RPMs)

-inaccurate (hard to hold a flat line)

Anything else to add? Also, is there any merit at all of running an external gate on my set-up? I seem to think there is...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/347761-internal-vs-external/
Share on other sites

IF YOU HAVE A HEAP OF BACK PRESSURE it may help. but thats a pretty small turbo for a rb25.... chances are you have some mad back pressure.

Yeah, hence the creep and retarded ignition. The .86 housing made a huuge difference.

btw its a QR25DE+T i.e. 2.5L 4cyl in my X-Trail...

Perhaps Illegal in your state? are you going to plumb it back into the exhaust or screamer?

I had the same issue as you with my old turbo, my current one, with the external gate, the boost line is absolutely flat as- perfect control.

Yeah, hence the creep and retarded ignition. The .86 housing made a huuge difference.

btw its a QR25DE+T i.e. 2.5L 4cyl in my X-Trail...

Have been through these problems before on the XR6T's - ie biggish engine littlish turbo. You will find that most crappy internal gates are not very lineaar if you compare pressure applied to rod extension. We found that some actuators sold as a 8psi actuator would crack around 7psi and be at full extension by 30psi. We went through alot of actuators before finding the right one. you may need to test this for yourself.

The other trick is to change the boost source for the actuator to right at the start of the scroll as you will find that with more flow the pressure at this point goes up when compare to the scroll outlet. On an xr6t if you had 12psi at the outlet at 5000rpm you may have upto 15psi at the start of the scroll. This obviously puts more pressure onto the actuator to open further - hence better boost control.

PS - there is nothing wrong with internal gates in the right applications esspecially if you can get your hands on a dual sided actuator.

  • Like 1

Perhaps Illegal in your state? are you going to plumb it back into the exhaust or screamer?

I had the same issue as you with my old turbo, my current one, with the external gate, the boost line is absolutely flat as- perfect control.

Yeah the screamer would def be illegal in WA, but I was planning to have the exhaust shop make up a screamer pipe, and a recirculation pipe, so few V band clamps and a block off plate later, I'd have a screamer/recirc...

from what i have seen, heard of, read and results etc

external wastegate setups are

more expensive

usually more complex

better response

better control

the two main points are the last two

Thanks man, that helps heaps :) The first two aren't really a problem, there's heaps of space under my manifold, only the cooler piping and an engine mount to doge (easy).

Have been through these problems before on the XR6T's - ie biggish engine littlish turbo. You will find that most crappy internal gates are not very lineaar if you compare pressure applied to rod extension. We found that some actuators sold as a 8psi actuator would crack around 7psi and be at full extension by 30psi. We went through alot of actuators before finding the right one. you may need to test this for yourself.

The other trick is to change the boost source for the actuator to right at the start of the scroll as you will find that with more flow the pressure at this point goes up when compare to the scroll outlet. On an xr6t if you had 12psi at the outlet at 5000rpm you may have upto 15psi at the start of the scroll. This obviously puts more pressure onto the actuator to open further - hence better boost control.

PS - there is nothing wrong with internal gates in the right applications esspecially if you can get your hands on a dual sided actuator.

Yeah I had the same problem with the 1.0 bar actuator, it was making about 12psi with 3mm of pre-tension, when it should make more like 14-15, boost dropped off to about 10 at redline - so clearly didn't want that. The .5bar one I'm using at the moment, has heaps of pretension and makes 10, which it obviously isn't designed for, hence the poor control, I'd imagine it'd work fine at 7psi though. Both were genuine Garrett actuators. My boost source is taken from the cooler pipe closest to the throttle body, and the disco potato has no provision for a nipple located on the comp. housing, thanks bro.

When your pushing the limits, an external handles it better. Nobody [well almost nobody] has a problem with an internal at 7-10psi, but as you wind up the boost and increase the size of the turbo you will find the limits of an internal and an external gate comes into its own. I know that people on here have got their internal to behave, but it cost them several weekends, and a few remove and modifies/tunes etc before they got it [some tinarse will dispute this statement]. All us CBF'eds didn't bother we just strapped on an external and did the set and forget.

I also reckon that an external is better for the future as well - if you end up increasing power/boost etc then the external has the headroom for 'growth'.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...