Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fairly conservative timing up top. What comp are you running? I guess with the 3.15l and standard cams there is huge dynamic compression

Around 8.25:1. The rod ratio allow the engine to tolerate a little more ignition than a long rod engine too. The map is a long way off being finished. There is room for quite a few more degrees below 2000 rpm at light load and also ramping onto boost. Once the tune is finished i'll post up a completed copy of the map.

Just about to rescale my map now, and then go for a test drive.

Regarding the settings 2 INJ vs TPS, im guessing adding a correction here works similar to a RPM vs TPS fuel map might? Whatever the current load/rpm point is, a correction factor is applied to that load point based on TPS. And with the default values being 1.000, it means entirely by map.

And then I might need to add more fuel progressively from low to the high end of the TPS scale, in order to prop up the AFR's.

I thought I had the tune pretty much dead on right for low end drivability until I drove up a nearby range yesterday. The extra load the engine was under had the afr's dipping into the 16's at 2000 rpm when cruising at 60km/h in 4th. That load wasn't being reflected in the MAP sensor as the engine produces really good vacuum and has good low end torque.

While thats still safe, the same cruise speed and gear on level ground was around 14.7:1. (at this stage im more concerned with completing a run in, so im not too woried about aiming for maximum fuel economy.)

I'll take you up on that offer too Trent, and will email you a copy of the map once ive finished my latest bunch of changes and re-tune.

Cheers,

Ian

sorry ian i was on the dyno yesterday tuning another d-jet when i had a terrible realization i has posted the wrong parrameter (i had remembered the headers wrong), ignore the TPS vs INJ it is inj vs accel you need to play with.

sorry but thats what i get for posting withut the software infront of me... too many tuning suites and so many different names for similar things.

It pissed me off more that i got it wrong as i so often see the INJ vs TPS adjusted and it really plays havoc with a tune and i always set them to the default 1.000

again sorry.

Not that it will do much for you but here it is. 14000 is the pim value for 0.8 bar boost. The scale is calibrated with a 3 bar map sensor. As you can see there is still plenty to do with the tune. The goal at the moment for me is keeping it safe.

dont want it for me, was just curious. something you can do sitting at home, could use a fair bit more timing under light load between 1500 and 5000rpm. standard maps go up to ~50 degrees around 4000rpm, makes a huge difference to the way it drives off boost

Edited by JonnoHR31

sorry ian i was on the dyno yesterday tuning another d-jet when i had a terrible realization i has posted the wrong parrameter (i had remembered the headers wrong), ignore the TPS vs INJ it is inj vs accel you need to play with.

sorry but thats what i get for posting withut the software infront of me... too many tuning suites and so many different names for similar things.

It pissed me off more that i got it wrong as i so often see the INJ vs TPS adjusted and it really plays havoc with a tune and i always set them to the default 1.000

again sorry.

No worries. Ive already had to fatten up the acceleration enrichment a little to cure the flat spots. Ive left the INJ vs TPS at default for the moment too.

pretty much everyone I know adds a little in no 5 and a little more in no 6. very easy to do with injector correction % values. just trim in a bit there. to do it properly though you really need to measure the AFRs and/or EGTs in each runner and get it right that way, but just for a simple mid range kind of set-up adding a bit of fuel to compensate for the extra heat in no 6 and the extra air it gets (plenum design) is a good idea.

I hear what youre saying but i'm sure no one goes through the hassle of checking egts on each cylinder to get it spot on, especially on a stockish to mildly modified 26

Anyone cares to share the numbers for a 26 with stock injectors and plenum just for reference???

  • 2 weeks later...

i have the egt data from the greddy plenum on gtr somewhere on my laptop from the engine dyno testing i will post it up later just for interest sake. std GTR plenum compensation is minimal.

i did post it all up before but not sure where.

If you do it this way you can make changes on the fly to the main map without a A/f meter (say @ track day) because your changes in the main map are secondary to the base map.(providing the base map was setup on the dyno like i posted above)

Interesting, so it is fairly linear and should be reasonably accurate doing this?

yes, it'll keep using the same values. but you shouldnt ever really have your limiter set higher than your last ne point

I thought it interpolated the values, eg 7500 and 8000 points, if you are at 7750rpm it picks fuel and ignition half way between this, if your last value is at 8000 and you rev to 8500 it will keep linearly interpolating the values so it will inject more fuel still? might not be what you want but it won't hold flat surely?

Edited by Rolls

it interpolates between cells but if you go past the end of the map it'll keep using the same value as the last cell on the map (for whatever axis you've maxxed). it wont keep following the previous interpolation.

i certainly would do it, if you set the map up properly it'd never go outside the map anyway but even if it did it'd be safe. for example i have the last low road on my map set rich and retarded and the row just past rev limiter the same for safety.

an extreme example, imagine the last cell had 1 more degree of timing than the 1 before it, if it was set up the way you describe the timing would rise as you get further and further away from the limit of the map, hardly a good thing. much safer to have it flatline.

most newer ecus have protection features and you can set them up to cut everything if you overboost/over rev etc.

an extreme example, imagine the last cell had 1 more degree of timing than the 1 before it, if it was set up the way you describe the timing would rise as you get further and further away from the limit of the map, hardly a good thing. much safer to have it flatline.

most newer ecus have protection features and you can set them up to cut everything if you overboost/over rev etc.

Yeah good point, didn't think of the ignition. Proper protection features will always be better option.

i have the egt data from the greddy plenum on gtr somewhere on my laptop from the engine dyno testing i will post it up later just for interest sake. std GTR plenum compensation is minimal.

i did post it all up before but not sure where.

Hey Trent, do you still have the egt data for the greddy plenum/RB26?

Cheers

Justin

Any luck finding the data Trent?

And could someone pls tell me where can i find the maps and logs that are saved?

If i go to Program files > fc edit universal > maps All i can see is the sample maps that came with the software

Edited by Don Dada

The address its tell me is the same as above

Also if i go into File > open i am seeing the maps and the logs that i saved but it has a little lock on the icon.... i can open the logs from there into map watch and maps on to the main screen but again i cant see them if i go outside datalogit

vista? if so you need to install fc edit anywhere but program files, or turn off the feature that stores everything in program files in a seperate place, cant remember what its called.

Edited by JonnoHR31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't like "actual computers" for in car use. They take time to boot up, have OS annoyances, and so on. Arduinos etc are ready to go a few seconds after power on, don't mind being agressively powere cycled, because everything is non-volatile, don't mind being shaken and stirred.
    • As Fred would tell us, it's all about interpreting the rules. It's not a water sprayer, it's a water mister... But everything else you've said, 100%! Even a raspberry Pi would be great, use HDMI out for a display, and add a raspberry Pi CANBus hat to read values out from the ECU.
    • Being a race car, and being in the era of the Arduino, one would think it would take little effort to build a controller to do the spraying based on a real physical measurment. Waaaaay back in the dim dark AS days, JE "designed" (as in, he had help) a microcontroller based intercooler spray system. It watched the difference between a temp sensor stuck on the core and one in the free air in front of the cooler, and if the temperature difference exceeded a (settable) threshold, it would activate the sprays. Thus, it only ran water when there was an actual need for water. If you stop to think about the actual physical things that are going on in that stack of coolers, there's probably at least a couple of triggering conditions one could come up with, and one could probably even run one pump with more than one solenoid valve, to allow water to be placed where it is needed, or at all points at once (if it is needed at all points). We're in the age of science baby. But.... I suspect that intercooler water sprays are on the forbidden list in most circuit classes, no? So only good for Targa type stuff?
    • I'll just leave this with, holy shit, those cars at work are awesome, and this will look wicked!
    • Could you modify this duct so instead it pushes the extra air through the radiator too and not down and out? For temps, I know it's not the greatest idea, but as a bit of a last resort, you could use a very intermittent misting spray onto the front of the coolers/rad. You don't want to be soaking them such that water is dripping off, but a small most on/off so that the water evaporates. That point of it constantly evaporating, rather than being soaked in water, will pull a LOT of heat out of the cooler. I'm literally thinking just the little mist sprayers for a garden from Bunnings. Being in a low humidity climate it will help even more! The other trick if you want to be ghetto is some shade cloth hung in the opening, and keep it wet. Pretty much now it's acting like an evap cooler on a house, but cooling the air you need to use to cool the radiator...   On a topic to think about too though, when air enters through the bumper, is it all nicely ducted from the edges of that opening back at a nice angle, or is it like most cars, and the edge of the opening just stops, and suddenly it's wayyy wider behind that? If it does the later, get it shrouded out at nice angles. When that opening changes too rapidly, it can actually cause a high pressure zone between the front bar and radiator, and limit air flow into that area, which means less air for cooling, as it effectively stalls the air, AND adds to drag...
×
×
  • Create New...