Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could those that have actually put rb20de cams into a rb20det please reply,

I know there are lots of speculation, but i would like facts only please.

i have some de cams ready to put into my det, just wondering if i can find someone who has done it.

i know the de cam specs look less impressive but what do they do in real life, ultimately i'm looking for more midrange power, as i'm driftin my car, so more wide usable power is good for me.

please reply if you have done this, and with what type of result, and did you do any other mod at the same time.

Thanks

Dayna

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...haft-specs.html

The DE cams have a smaller inlet duration compared to the DET cams.

If anything it would only increase bottom end torque.

How much it would pull from the top end I wouldn't know. :D

that 'guy' is me! and i have finally changed them. I was just wondering if you Australians had some more info before i did do it.

heres a copy of the post, more info coming....

well, finally did it today!

done only a couple of g-tech runs,

166hp

15.58 quarter

7.54 0-60mph

car 'feels' better down low,

deffently no huge loss or gain of power,

i would personally say at the moment that the car is running better, more drive-able, power feels smoother/stronger down low.

boost is running low (10-11psi) and the g-tech runs were reasonable, considering i have done more runs of original setup since original post... and i was running quarters of up to 16.5!, i am finding the HP figure to be a good indicator tho.

I will hopefully tomorrow fiddle with the timing some, and tweek boost slightly and get back to ya some more.

Dayna

Peak power means jack.. If you have more power to get to that peak power even if it is slightly less then the car will obviously accelerate quicker. :D

Good to hear some positive results from the smaller duration/lift NA inlet cam on the T.

Dyno2003 (software sim) showed that with the smaller inlet cam only a couple of hp was lost up top however bottom end & mid had picked up quite a bit.

Give it a couple of weeks and you will get used to it.. Then you will be wondering if it really did make any difference. :D

SO is that the RB20DE Cams or wat? THanks

that 'guy' is me! and i have finally changed them.  I was just wondering if you Australians had some more info before i did do it.

heres a copy of the post, more info coming....

well, finally did it today!  

done only a couple of g-tech runs,  

166hp  

15.58 quarter  

7.54 0-60mph  

car 'feels' better down low,  

deffently no huge loss or gain of power,  

i would personally say at the moment that the car is running better, more drive-able, power feels smoother/stronger down low.

boost is running low (10-11psi) and the g-tech runs were reasonable, considering i have done more runs of original setup since original post... and i was running quarters of up to 16.5!, i am finding the HP figure to be a good indicator tho.  

I will hopefully tomorrow fiddle with the timing some, and tweek boost slightly and get back to ya some more.  

Dayna

Joel,

i agree with your software analyses and peak power thoughts!

The cams have made a very noticable difference down low-mid, previous setup i would say that boost started to build up around the 3,000rpm mark. Now with the NA cams boost is at 5psi at 2,500 and peaking around 2700-2800rpm. Car is more responsive and feels alot more pleasurable to drive and each gear change is into a good power band!

Being that my car is purpose built for drifting it is an avantage to have a fatter power curve and more usuable down low power.

I give it the THUMBS UP!

yes RB20DE cams 93RPS13

Dayna

(more info check out my post on SDU forum)

Dayna,

I read your thread on SAU and found it interesting. Good work. I am considering the the NA cams as I have a VG30 roller bearing (not high flowed) which is great when it comes on boost, but has left a bit of a hole down low.

Did you change both cams or just the cam on the intake side? What pressure (torque) did you tighten the bolts that holds the cams down with?

Has there been anyone else who has actually made this change given you any feedback?

how much did you pick up an rb20de intake cam for? and what else was required to buy to make it all work? or was it just a case of slap her in there and drive away?

also, do you have an 'before' performance figures to compare to the 'after' figures that you posted?

cheers,

Warren.

WazR32GTSt

i scored the cams for NUDDA!, and it was just a matter of unbolting them (apart from all the work to take the cam belt off etc etc), and swapping them over, I changed both the intake and exhaust to the DE cams. it took me a cruisy 5-6 hours to do, i changed the cambelt and front oil seals at the same time.

I wish i had a super accurate dyno graph of before and after but alas i don't, but i did do alot of runs using a g-tech meter and before and after times are virtualy identical, BUT here comes the major difference....

Boost starts to rise from 0psi approx 1900RPM! and will max(12psi) at approx 2500RPM. this is 500-600RPM lower than standard. torque down low is increased considerably even when off boost and just cruising. Top end power has not changed enough to notice. obviously it has but i believe not very significantly.

I'm a drifter, thats what my car is built for, and now it has a better motor for driftin, but i have not lost outright drag performance...if anything it could be faster but i feel it is equal.

it cost me nothin but time to do and i had to change my cam belt and fix the oil leaks anyhow so didn't take much extra to pop the covers off and swap cams over.

it is more drive-able and cruisy and feels like it actually is a 6-cylinder now it skids up alot easier now thats for sure!

hope this info helps

Dayna

  • 1 year later...

I just stumbled accross this thread again and thought I woudl give out some feedback. I swapped the inlet cam on my RB20DET for an inlet cam on my RB20DE. At first I did not notice a real difference, but when you put you foot down - boy is it sh!t. This was a massive waste of time in my opinion and I was soooooo happy to put the stock cam back in. For anyone who would like to try this for themselves I paid $100 for the pair and ended up giving them away as it was too painful thinking about the time I had wasted rooting around with this. Maybe they just don't work as well in Australia as they do in NZ : )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A few small updates since the previous post and lessons. I decided to do a little interior light upgrade on the 110. I quite like the iilumo items, even if they're a bit of a premium over other brands. You'll also note the Stedi Fogs, that will go into the S15 fog lights as I needed to match the bulbs since I got the new ones earlier. I hope they fit as the body is quite a bit longer than your normal bulb.  Annoyingly, I managed to trip the fuse, which normally wouldn't be an issue until I located the fuse. I can't say I've ever come across this. I had lucked out that someone nearby had a spare, but oddly enough Toyota dealerships seem to keep this in stock. I ordered some to keep in my stash and as luck would have it, someone else nearby tripped the same fuse so I passed on the favour.  I also did a little service on the 110 ahead of some additional work coming up. It's been annoying that Goleby's stopped carrying this particular HKS filter for the 110, so now I need to keep them on order from Japan. I also took the opportunity to install a bash plate and number plate riser. The plate riser is such a cheap but nice fix to help really tidy up the car. I'm tempted to now also replace my headlights, on this car. Both items were from Project Aero.    I also needed to replace the rear tyres on the 110, and after trying to get it aligned learnt that I need to replace some bushes in the front end, so that's next.  Closing out this update with a nicer picture as always! 
    • Yeah mate, never miss it.
    • Any going to watch World Time Attack at SMSP this year?
    • Appreciate the correction on the "ground", that will make a huge difference to looking at this. That makes complete sense about AF70/AF71 which is what I had come down to being the issue, one of these. I'll have another look in the ignition wiring when I get a chance next week. I'll also make up a jumper wire for running that AF73 test.  ECU is fine, relay itself is fine, pump harness is fine and the pump itself is fine. I am going to upgrade the Walbro 255 anyway with a DW300 I have since I need to replace the fuel sender and I'm going to upgrade the FPR with my chasebays kit ready for new plenum/injectors/dbw, but I'll get this working first. That's why this is so frustrating. 
×
×
  • Create New...