Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quote by R33:"Now the heaver car will have more weight on the tyres. This means that more braking force can be applied before lock up. Therefore the heavier car is capable of more braking force before reaching its maximum which occurs just before lock up. It is because of the fact the heavier car can apply more force that it will stop quicker."

Dude, i think what you are refering to is pressure....that because of the extra weight, there is more pressure per square inch of the tire's contact patch compared to the lighter car, and hence should be able to apply more force without reaching the grip limit and locking up.

But i think you forgot to factor in that while there is more weight and pressure on the tires to give it an increased grip limit, there is also that extra weight which will overwhelm the grip as well.

Put simply...if what u said were true.....F1 cars would weigh 10 tonnes and wear 175mm tires.... but we dont see that happening dont we?

I like R33man's theory. It makes total sense to me, but I'm really not qualified to say if it's right or wrong.

Anyway, just to add some more to the topic, I did an advanced driving course with Ian Luff a year or so ago and he said that trucks can generally brake as well as most cars. This is because of the contact area of the tyres to weight ratio.

I like R33man's theory. It makes total sense to me, but I'm really not qualified to say if it's right or wrong.  

Anyway, just to add some more to the topic, I did an advanced driving course with Ian Luff a year or so ago and he said that trucks can generally brake as well as most cars. This is because of the contact area of the tyres to weight ratio.

and there's a great reason to find a different advanced driving school!

Doughboy gave the right answer in the 3rd post, why are we still talkin about it?

and there's a great reason to find a different advanced driving school!

not nessasarily.

Your average truck (without the million variables) can brake at approx 75% of what your family sedan can.

so he was sorta right in saying what he did :(

Maybe not 'as well' but it's not 'too far' off

Very true.........

Surprisingly one of the hardest things to make brake quickly is a motorcycle. High centre of gravity, and short wheelbase. They are awsome in every way except braking capacity. You would not want to lock the front wheel, or go over the handlebars I think.

I have not looked at figures, but I would not be surprised if a top bike could stay with a formula one car in acceleration, but the formula car would kill it for braking.

Regardless of the brakes the tyres will provide a given coefficient of friction (Cf).

Precisely. As mentioned bigger brakes will only mean that you can stop from a higher speed without fade or multiple times without fade. We're assuming the brakes on both cars are adequately sized for at least 1 100->0km/h stop.

Remember the old adage "brakes stop the wheels, tyres stop the car". Small brakes can lock wheels no problem, your braking is limited by the tyre's adhesion with the road until you reach the point where the brakes start to go off.

As for who will stop first, the heavier car will have a bigger contact patch proportional to its weight. The Cf shouldn't change IMO because at a given point on the contact patch the tyre can only push down on the road with a force equivalent to its internal pressure. So the braking gain of the higher car is related to having a bigger contact patch. I think both cars would be fairly similar really.

More weight means more pressure on the tires, and it does seem logical that they would stop better. However the tyre will be under much more stress and deform more, and thus, traction will not increase in a linear relationship with weight.

Half the reason you dont want body roll around a corner is to help spread the load onto the inside tyre. Sure the outside tire has alot more weight on it, and theoretically should hold the road better as you get more body roll but it gets to a point overloaded and looses traction and it ends up worse!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...