Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes to all

well that's hardly comparable.

E85 changes the rules somewhat similar to race grade fuels.

You often can make 30-40rwkw extra with the restriction in place.

You result would be close to 300 when you take 40 off for E85, and then 20 for hubs.

You'd hardly then be running 27psi without the fuel too :P

So was my 3" exhaust @ 270rwkw/17psi when it was showing an issue/restriction. :)

Drop in race fuel (sunoco 104) and all of a sudden we were @ 370rwkw/24psi with the same exhaust. We could use more timing and boost everywhere.

Just goes to show it's not just about the gas :)

Obviously exhaust and manifold are not the same particular part, but similar issue none the less.

I've seen another car with GT-SS's do the same thing PULP vs Race fuel and a 3" exhaust

Thats very very cool, always suspected they should be able to make that kind of power with an un-shy amount of boost - wicked power at 4000rpm too :D

Any plans to get it on a dragstrip or something?

Just on a side note... The AMMRR dyno seems to spit out some very kind figures even for a hub dyno!

"Simon-R32" 3076R 0.63 rear is spitting out what would seem impossible hp for the boost level and "wasnt me" with his internal w/g 3076R 0.8 rear is spitting out huge numbers at low revs that also appear impossible...

I'm not trying to start a shit fight in regards to dyno results but I think they might have to be taken with a grain of salt!

Just on a side note... The AMMRR dyno seems to spit out some very kind figures even for a hub dyno!

"Simon-R32" 3076R 0.63 rear is spitting out what would seem impossible hp for the boost level and "wasnt me" with his internal w/g 3076R 0.8 rear is spitting out huge numbers at low revs that also appear impossible...

I'm not trying to start a shit fight in regards to dyno results but I think they might have to be taken with a grain of salt!

i would agree 100% thats why i said it would make between 350-360 rwkw on a chassis dyno.... ill tell you right now my cars not making 411rwkw lol

i would agree 100% thats why i said it would make between 350-360 rwkw on a chassis dyno.... ill tell you right now my cars not making 411rwkw lol

Yeah fair call... STP correction apparently is the highest correction (so maybe get them to turn it off when they print off the graph). Might even try to put correction on my runs to see what it makes haha

To the defense of the guys in Adelaide it's a bit hard to run a mph when they don't have a drag strip (kehehehe)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...