Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been thinking about fuel for my rb30. I was going to go e85 but we can't get it at the pumps where I'm at. I was going to ship it by the barrel, fill up for races(time attack, drag, HPDE, etc), and use pump gas for the street.

BUT! If I'm going to be shipping fuel and making an alcohol safe fuel system, why not use methanol? According to my math, even at 75/25 meth-to-pump it should make more power than E85. It should also run cooler, be easier to find (lots of drag cars here,) and be cheaper.

Anybody gone done this road before?

Interesting fact- in china, where corn is expensive, flex fuel vehicles run M85!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/
Share on other sites

Nobody has any experience? I keep looking around and all I'm finding is a lot of bs about methanol being dangerous and toxic. It's actually less dangerous and toxic than gasoline.

I think the only reason it isn't used is because Injectors large enough to use methanol and still idle and run normal only recently became available. (id2000)

Unless someone has a good reason not to do it I'm gonna give it a shot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630372
Share on other sites

I can add that buying E85 at the pump will only give many inconsistent results.

Preferred race fuel is C16 or Aviation fuels as they prove to be more stable throughout the year.

As for Power, Methanol makes a bigger bang but more costly to obtain. You will require some form of license in most developed countries.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630563
Share on other sites

I've been thinking about fuel for my rb30. I was going to go e85 but we can't get it at the pumps where I'm at. I was going to ship it by the barrel, fill up for races(time attack, drag, HPDE, etc), and use pump gas for the street.

BUT! If I'm going to be shipping fuel and making an alcohol safe fuel system, why not use methanol? According to my math, even at 75/25 meth-to-pump it should make more power than E85. It should also run cooler, be easier to find (lots of drag cars here,) and be cheaper.

Anybody gone done this road before?

Interesting fact- in china, where corn is expensive, flex fuel vehicles run M85!

What is the engine built for? Compression, expected boost, is it intercooled, what is the injector location?

Edited by rob82
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630810
Share on other sites

I can add that buying E85 at the pump will only give many inconsistent results.

Preferred race fuel is C16 or Aviation fuels as they prove to be more stable throughout the year.

As for Power, Methanol makes a bigger bang but more costly to obtain. You will require some form of license in most developed countries.

Pump e85 is fine provided you tune for the variations. We can match c16 but @ $1 a litre....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5630944
Share on other sites

If you are talking about E85 vs meth, why not go WMI? You get pretty much the same power boost as you would when tuning for E85 and the methanol cooler running = the best of both worlds. And you won't use much unless you are boosting, don't need huge injectors, can run on pump fuel everywhere, don't need to upgrade any fuel lines or systems and there are some great packages out there for it. Plus you can vary the amount of meth by juggling with nozzle sizes and multiple nozzles. It is on tap just waiting for you to boost it!

As an example I used probably 100-150ml in 400km of highway driving and I have a 3.5 litre reservoir. I know that when you race with it it is used heaps more, but you can top up between laps etc.

And mixed 50/50 WM in a container is pretty much inert.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5631965
Share on other sites

One bad thing I've seen with methanol is it burns with almost invisible flames, though E85 could be the same.

All those burnout cars that run it seem to set their tyres and half the track alight though. I also saw an evo with big cams shooting 1m flames on the overrun after it supposedly had been tuned, whether this was the car or the fuel I do not know.

Anyone know more ?

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5633915
Share on other sites

One bad thing I've seen with methanol is it burns with almost invisible flames, though E85 could be the same.

All those burnout cars that run it seem to set their tyres and half the track alight though. I also saw an evo with big cams shooting 1m flames on the overrun after it supposedly had been tuned, whether this was the car or the fuel I do not know.

Anyone know more ?

The 15% fuel in the methanol would cause the flame to be visible :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5633942
Share on other sites

BoostedR's build data from the -5 vs GTRS thread

I have built a RB31/26DETT 824hp -engine hp

264 9.8 HKS

Tomei Dumps

3" x 2 (no mufflers)

530ft lb @ 2800rpm

22psi max

Garrett -10's

Ported std manifolds

BP98 with 10% methanol

Motec

That result proves you can lean on the engine a lot more with just 10% methanol. A water/meth injection setup would produce a similar result.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5633983
Share on other sites

I have an aquamist hfs-6 on the car right now. It works good but won't give the same performance as mixing meth. It's also something else to break at the track.

The 15% gasoline is supposed to add color to the flame also. I might try a 50/50 mix and move up from there.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350574-methanol-vs-e85/#findComment-5634225
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...