Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I am finally approaching R32 GTR ownership with test drives and vehicle inspections arranged over the coming fortnight. Having returned to the SAU forums (after approx 4 years absence), I have been reading a lot, again, about HICAS on the R32 GTR. It seems to me the vast majority of R32 GTR drivers prefer their cars without it.

So my question is: when the R32 GTR begun its domination of Australian Touring Car Championships at the hands of Mark Skaife and Jim Richards, did that particular variant of R32 GTR have HICAS???

For the record, I am currently looking a 1994 R32 GTR recently imported to Australia from Japan with approx 90,000 kms on the clock.

BunsenBurna

  On 22/01/2011 at 10:29 PM, BunsenBurna said:

Hi all

I am finally approaching R32 GTR ownership with test drives and vehicle inspections arranged over the coming fortnight. Having returned to the SAU forums (after approx 4 years absence), I have been reading a lot, again, about HICAS on the R32 GTR. It seems to me the vast majority of R32 GTR drivers prefer their cars without it.

So my question is: when the R32 GTR begun its domination of Australian Touring Car Championships at the hands of Mark Skaife and Jim Richards, did that particular variant of R32 GTR have HICAS???

For the record, I am currently looking a 1994 R32 GTR recently imported to Australia from Japan with approx 90,000 kms on the clock.

BunsenBurna

if its 90K, which is very odd number :)

you better have the 100K service done on it ASAP, in case you buy it

otherwise might regret big time

The R32 was homologated both with and without Hicas, after testing both options it was left of race cars, mine was locked when I bought the car, and I would love to know what it's like, but all report are I would just waste time getting it to work only to lock it again. Pretty sure every r32 GTR had it from the factory though

  On 23/01/2011 at 1:07 AM, maclarenf1 said:

if its 90K, which is very odd number :)

you better have the 100K service done on it ASAP, in case you buy it

otherwise might regret big time

  On 23/01/2011 at 2:05 AM, iplen said:

The R32 was homologated both with and without Hicas, after testing both options it was left of race cars, mine was locked when I bought the car, and I would love to know what it's like, but all report are I would just waste time getting it to work only to lock it again. Pretty sure every r32 GTR had it from the factory though

maclarenf1 - why is 90k such an odd number? I'm certainly mindful of the big 100k service. I am trying to be very thorough pre purchase of this vehicle.

Thank you iplen for the info. We'll see how I go with HICAS!

not to put a damper on things:

90k. now the last one of those cars was built in 94. that is currently 17 yrs (assuming a Jan94 build) so 5300 km/yr as a round number. if that car comes up at a cheap price I would suspect something is amiss with it. if its a genuine example then the owner is going to want a LOT for it. they are becoming collectors items and the japanese are well aware of it.

re hicas: see the post a few back. racecars didn't have it the road cars (or every one I have been under) did.

once I get mine finished it will have it functioning as well.

its not noticeable until you get up to speed and then the car turns in a bit quicker :)

  On 23/01/2011 at 9:45 AM, Chris Rogers said:

if its a genuine example then the owner is going to want a LOT for it. they are becoming collectors items and the japanese are well aware of it.

What sort of money would you consider a lot? I'm certainly not paying $45,000 - $53,000 (like the fine Aus delivered examples sold as part of a Sydney auction recently).

I am being overly optimistic that the kms are genuine, call it wishful thinking amongst other things. But I am having the car thoroughly inspected and I am expecting to part with a pretty penny.

Fred Gibson removed the HICAS from the race cars because it had the nasty habit of turning the car around if you backed off halfway around a corner. Not an ideal situation on the racetrack.

NEVER believe the odometer of a car delivered from Japan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meh, I think we're well into a new era of 90s JDM car. The days when spare engines and parts were cheap and plentiful are long gone. Therefore the YOLO approach is now massively difficult to justify, use and maintain. One should start to ponder whether an 800HP build is really justified, using stock parts. My thoughts? If you like/love the car and want to keep it and don't want to ruin yet another one, then be discrete about how much you ask from the stock parts. A 5 or 600 HP build is still a very fast car. If you want to go silly, have to have the 1000HP territory, then just drop all your cash, buy billet everything (or PRP cast block, etc etc) and use a bigger/more modern gearbag, and put a massive retrofit diff and axles into it. If you ruin any of those things then you're either ham fisted and deserve it, or you're pushing waaaay too far for the stock stuff anyway. The (presumably) young guys who are buying 30-35 year old busted arse Jap refugees and thinking they can live the life that was lived by others 20 years ago are deluded. Expectations need to be adjusted somewhat.
    • Just don’t be silly enough to think it’ll never happen either 
    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
×
×
  • Create New...