Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I am finally approaching R32 GTR ownership with test drives and vehicle inspections arranged over the coming fortnight. Having returned to the SAU forums (after approx 4 years absence), I have been reading a lot, again, about HICAS on the R32 GTR. It seems to me the vast majority of R32 GTR drivers prefer their cars without it.

So my question is: when the R32 GTR begun its domination of Australian Touring Car Championships at the hands of Mark Skaife and Jim Richards, did that particular variant of R32 GTR have HICAS???

For the record, I am currently looking a 1994 R32 GTR recently imported to Australia from Japan with approx 90,000 kms on the clock.

BunsenBurna

Hi all

I am finally approaching R32 GTR ownership with test drives and vehicle inspections arranged over the coming fortnight. Having returned to the SAU forums (after approx 4 years absence), I have been reading a lot, again, about HICAS on the R32 GTR. It seems to me the vast majority of R32 GTR drivers prefer their cars without it.

So my question is: when the R32 GTR begun its domination of Australian Touring Car Championships at the hands of Mark Skaife and Jim Richards, did that particular variant of R32 GTR have HICAS???

For the record, I am currently looking a 1994 R32 GTR recently imported to Australia from Japan with approx 90,000 kms on the clock.

BunsenBurna

if its 90K, which is very odd number :)

you better have the 100K service done on it ASAP, in case you buy it

otherwise might regret big time

The R32 was homologated both with and without Hicas, after testing both options it was left of race cars, mine was locked when I bought the car, and I would love to know what it's like, but all report are I would just waste time getting it to work only to lock it again. Pretty sure every r32 GTR had it from the factory though

if its 90K, which is very odd number :)

you better have the 100K service done on it ASAP, in case you buy it

otherwise might regret big time

The R32 was homologated both with and without Hicas, after testing both options it was left of race cars, mine was locked when I bought the car, and I would love to know what it's like, but all report are I would just waste time getting it to work only to lock it again. Pretty sure every r32 GTR had it from the factory though

maclarenf1 - why is 90k such an odd number? I'm certainly mindful of the big 100k service. I am trying to be very thorough pre purchase of this vehicle.

Thank you iplen for the info. We'll see how I go with HICAS!

not to put a damper on things:

90k. now the last one of those cars was built in 94. that is currently 17 yrs (assuming a Jan94 build) so 5300 km/yr as a round number. if that car comes up at a cheap price I would suspect something is amiss with it. if its a genuine example then the owner is going to want a LOT for it. they are becoming collectors items and the japanese are well aware of it.

re hicas: see the post a few back. racecars didn't have it the road cars (or every one I have been under) did.

once I get mine finished it will have it functioning as well.

its not noticeable until you get up to speed and then the car turns in a bit quicker :)

if its a genuine example then the owner is going to want a LOT for it. they are becoming collectors items and the japanese are well aware of it.

What sort of money would you consider a lot? I'm certainly not paying $45,000 - $53,000 (like the fine Aus delivered examples sold as part of a Sydney auction recently).

I am being overly optimistic that the kms are genuine, call it wishful thinking amongst other things. But I am having the car thoroughly inspected and I am expecting to part with a pretty penny.

Fred Gibson removed the HICAS from the race cars because it had the nasty habit of turning the car around if you backed off halfway around a corner. Not an ideal situation on the racetrack.

NEVER believe the odometer of a car delivered from Japan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...