Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well, i realise dyno's are only a means of measurement, but i'm convinced that my setup has seemingly less power than almost everybody elses thats similar, so im just trying to figure out what the restriction could possibly be.

here's a list of what's been done:

unopened s1 rb25det

ems stinger ecu

hks gt2835 pro-s

3" flexi pipe intake hose

nismo 740cc injectors

walbro pump

hybrid cooler

stock coils

exhaust that goes from 2.5" to 3", 2 mufflers no cat

18psi - 315rwhp

13.1 @ 109mph on 205 rubber

compression test came up as 150psi across all 6 cylinders

it holds boost through to redline, and im assuming the coilpacks are working as it doesnt miss. it has a stock fuel pressure regulator.

the most obvious thing i can think of is either the exhaust is restricting it, or my tuner isn't putting any timing into it?

any thoughts please punt them at me

cheers in advance

Edited by bj0rn
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351616-power-restriction/
Share on other sites

2.5" exhaust - your issue is staring you in the face.

3" or bust at a minimum.

Also 230rwkw/109mph, is pretty close. So it's not down on power, its just restricted to the heavens.

You'll probably get 20-30rwkw out of an exhaust change easily.

What will go pop?

The motor?

Mate - get the exhaust fixed. Drive sedately to tuners (or have them do the work on-site if possible), run it up and have a look.

There is no way around this. Your motor will simply not just up and die from an exhaust change, however the tune MUST be looked at with such a restrictive exhaust. You will hit load points that you weren't previously.

Also that tune, is honestly looking pretty average. The curve should be much smoother. Is the right axis is toruqe, then its 100% a poor tune as its dropping around 104-120, but then that could also be the exhaust.

Overall moral of this story? Get the exhaust fixed, and get the tuner to have another look at it all.

That often doesn't work, or give you a good idea.

Cause it's louder, you've made a change - often a bit of placebo kicks in.

Hence on the same dyno/tuner etc, you'll soon see whats going on.

That turbo is good for 260-280rwkw, and should be up around 112-114mph once you get that power.

I was racing regularly years ago with 220rwkw and I was running 12.9 @ 109mph consistently.

nismoid: funnily enough, its only 2.5" where the hks dump flange meets the front pipe. and its only that small for about an inch, then immediatgoes to 3 inch. it has a hollowed out cat, then two mufflers. are you sure it'd be the exhaust?

heres a photo;

DSCF0217.jpg

harey: the intake has wire which stops it from flexing. im fairly positive thats not the issue.

nismoid: funnily enough, its only 2.5" where the hks dump flange meets the front pipe. and its only that small for about an inch, then immediatgoes to 3 inch. it has a hollowed out cat, then two mufflers. are you sure it'd be the exhaust?

heres a photo;

harey: the intake has wire which stops it from flexing. im fairly positive thats not the issue.

That looks terrible. Is that 2.5" section part of the dump pipe or the front pipe? Either way it is most likely the cause and should be changed immediately.

The intake wont be causing the issue yet at that low power level. I had a flexi intake with wire and it still twisted and did nasty things above 250rwkw.

The exit of the HKS dump is 70mm from memory. Redo that to be something a little nicer than what youve got, yours looks more like 65mm ID, even if it were 68mm it could potentially hold back a lot of power.

The other issue is the flexi intake pipe, its GOT to be an issue.

Redo both ASAP. You WILL need a retune.

+1

for getting the 2.5in section replaced.

On my WRX years ago the owner had a terrible exhaust on it, pieces were 3in, some still had stock mufflers and resonators. it was all welded together horribly and the dump pipe had a big dent in it from where it was bent into shape. after i had the catback section replaced the car was louder, but still didnt gain any power because of the dent in the front pipe. this dent was quite big and was definitely restricting it.

The exhaust bloke said its like when you step on a garden hose, the amount of water that comes out the end is less because it cant flow past the restriction of your foot on the hose.

moral of the story,

had the dent fixed, welded in a new 3in section and gained power all over the power band.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...