Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I kinda just jumped into this because I accidentally starved my HX35 7blade of oil :( . A word to the wise, don't us F'ing stock Nissan oil feed fittings! There are _THREE_ hidden ninja restrictors! So I landed a brand new billet 5557 T3 .82 a/r rear for a good price. It will be going in my s13 with 25DE/30 with a tubular manifold (unfortunately its a T4 divided manifold so i will have to make an adapter :( ). Damn shame I don't get to put the twin scroll to use!

Looking for a very responsive street setup and a relatively quick 1/4 mile dragger (hoping for 11s!).

I know the new generation of Precision turbos is relatively new, but what do you guys think; Will i accomplish my goals above? Should I have gone larger so I could utilize a T4 divided setup? Is the T3 .82 going to run out of puff?

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351669-precision-5557-in-an-rb30/
Share on other sites

But how can such a big turbo have the response that I'm looking for? The guy says "The GT4088 could be up your street, good responce and I dont think it ran out of puff." Good response? A GT40!?!?

Edited by ST240

I kinda just jumped into this because I accidentally starved my HX35 7blade of oil :( . A word to the wise, don't us F'ing stock Nissan oil feed fittings! There are _THREE_ hidden ninja restrictors! So I landed a brand new billet 5557 T3 .82 a/r rear for a good price. It will be going in my s13 with 25DE/30 with a tubular manifold (unfortunately its a T4 divided manifold so i will have to make an adapter :( ). Damn shame I don't get to put the twin scroll to use!

Looking for a very responsive street setup and a relatively quick 1/4 mile dragger (hoping for 11s!).

I know the new generation of Precision turbos is relatively new, but what do you guys think; Will i accomplish my goals above? Should I have gone larger so I could utilize a T4 divided setup? Is the T3 .82 going to run out of puff?

Thanks guys!

I have a 5557 on an rb25... It chokes the 25 and only makes 245rwkw at 20 psi... Sell it.

Did you read that link I posted?

"a 1.06a/r T4 twinscroll housing builds boost faster than a .82a/r open T3"

"From that result I'd be picking a 1.05a/r twin scroll T4 EFR8374 to be an absolute torque monster on an RB30!"

Read through the RB30 dyno results and pick a turbo from there.

Would be such a shame to not use the T4 twinscroll manifold!

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

You can get a GT3076R in a 1.06a/r twinscroll - that'd be insane. EFR7670 would be crushing, GT3582R power with better than GT3076R spool

You can get a GT3076R in a 1.06a/r twinscroll - that'd be insane. EFR7670 would be crushing, GT3582R power with better than GT3076R spool

Forgot about the 3076 in 1.06 twinscroll T4! Dont know much about this EFR7670, will have a read.

I have a 5557 on an rb25... It chokes the 25 and only makes 245rwkw at 20 psi... Sell it.

Serious? The thing is rated at 525 crank hp. What rear do you have on it?

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

Wow I can't believe a T4 1.08 twin scroll spools faster than a T3 .82!!!

Isn't a 5557 somewhere between a GT3071 and a GT3076? I have the .82 rear. I saw Al's setup and thats what I'm pretty much hoping for.

Damn. Looks like I might be selling it :( .

Edited by ST240

Jeez Justin I just read your posts in the Precision Billet Turbo thread. Disappointing indeed.

I would be quite pissed if I ran the 5557 up to 20 psi on my 30 and didn't make 300 kW. I wonder how inefficient that compressor is at its "525 HP rated" capacity...

Maybe I should just be a guinea pig and run it ;) .

Serious? The thing is rated at 525 crank hp. What rear do you have on it?

Wow I can't believe a T4 1.08 twin scroll spools faster than a T3 .82!!!

Isn't a 5557 somewhere between a GT3071 and a GT3076? I have the .82 rear. I saw Al's setup and thats what I'm pretty much hoping for.

Damn. Looks like I might be selling it :( .

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

Hmm...no wonder they never really put any test results of this combo up on here.

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

I coulda sworn I saw you say you had a .63 in that thread...

Well sports fans.

I'll post up the dyno sheet tomorow.... However-

I ended up making 245 odd rwkw on 98 at 20psi (that drops off to 18psi at 8000rpm) from my 5557 .63 exh housing. All the usual supporting mods, no major restrictions.

I was a little dissapointed. For the lag I would have expected 255/260ish rwkw at that boost level.

It seems high boost is needed for the numbers with these turbo's. I just didn't want to run anymore boost on a stock 100k rb25.

I'll be going to a td06...

J.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...