Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I kinda just jumped into this because I accidentally starved my HX35 7blade of oil :( . A word to the wise, don't us F'ing stock Nissan oil feed fittings! There are _THREE_ hidden ninja restrictors! So I landed a brand new billet 5557 T3 .82 a/r rear for a good price. It will be going in my s13 with 25DE/30 with a tubular manifold (unfortunately its a T4 divided manifold so i will have to make an adapter :( ). Damn shame I don't get to put the twin scroll to use!

Looking for a very responsive street setup and a relatively quick 1/4 mile dragger (hoping for 11s!).

I know the new generation of Precision turbos is relatively new, but what do you guys think; Will i accomplish my goals above? Should I have gone larger so I could utilize a T4 divided setup? Is the T3 .82 going to run out of puff?

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351669-precision-5557-in-an-rb30/
Share on other sites

But how can such a big turbo have the response that I'm looking for? The guy says "The GT4088 could be up your street, good responce and I dont think it ran out of puff." Good response? A GT40!?!?

Edited by ST240

I kinda just jumped into this because I accidentally starved my HX35 7blade of oil :( . A word to the wise, don't us F'ing stock Nissan oil feed fittings! There are _THREE_ hidden ninja restrictors! So I landed a brand new billet 5557 T3 .82 a/r rear for a good price. It will be going in my s13 with 25DE/30 with a tubular manifold (unfortunately its a T4 divided manifold so i will have to make an adapter :( ). Damn shame I don't get to put the twin scroll to use!

Looking for a very responsive street setup and a relatively quick 1/4 mile dragger (hoping for 11s!).

I know the new generation of Precision turbos is relatively new, but what do you guys think; Will i accomplish my goals above? Should I have gone larger so I could utilize a T4 divided setup? Is the T3 .82 going to run out of puff?

Thanks guys!

I have a 5557 on an rb25... It chokes the 25 and only makes 245rwkw at 20 psi... Sell it.

Did you read that link I posted?

"a 1.06a/r T4 twinscroll housing builds boost faster than a .82a/r open T3"

"From that result I'd be picking a 1.05a/r twin scroll T4 EFR8374 to be an absolute torque monster on an RB30!"

Read through the RB30 dyno results and pick a turbo from there.

Would be such a shame to not use the T4 twinscroll manifold!

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

You can get a GT3076R in a 1.06a/r twinscroll - that'd be insane. EFR7670 would be crushing, GT3582R power with better than GT3076R spool

You can get a GT3076R in a 1.06a/r twinscroll - that'd be insane. EFR7670 would be crushing, GT3582R power with better than GT3076R spool

Forgot about the 3076 in 1.06 twinscroll T4! Dont know much about this EFR7670, will have a read.

I have a 5557 on an rb25... It chokes the 25 and only makes 245rwkw at 20 psi... Sell it.

Serious? The thing is rated at 525 crank hp. What rear do you have on it?

If your after maximum response and dont care about wasting your twinscroll T4 manifold then go a 3076 0.82. Can make a super responsive 300rwkw, check out Al's setup first dyno on Page 4 of RB30 dyno results.

Wow I can't believe a T4 1.08 twin scroll spools faster than a T3 .82!!!

Isn't a 5557 somewhere between a GT3071 and a GT3076? I have the .82 rear. I saw Al's setup and thats what I'm pretty much hoping for.

Damn. Looks like I might be selling it :( .

Edited by ST240

Jeez Justin I just read your posts in the Precision Billet Turbo thread. Disappointing indeed.

I would be quite pissed if I ran the 5557 up to 20 psi on my 30 and didn't make 300 kW. I wonder how inefficient that compressor is at its "525 HP rated" capacity...

Maybe I should just be a guinea pig and run it ;) .

Serious? The thing is rated at 525 crank hp. What rear do you have on it?

Wow I can't believe a T4 1.08 twin scroll spools faster than a T3 .82!!!

Isn't a 5557 somewhere between a GT3071 and a GT3076? I have the .82 rear. I saw Al's setup and thats what I'm pretty much hoping for.

Damn. Looks like I might be selling it :( .

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

Hmm...no wonder they never really put any test results of this combo up on here.

I have a .82 rear... drops off 21psi to 18psi from 6k-7.8k rpm and wont make any more than 250rwkw on 98... The response isn't particulary awsome for the power either..

Sell it!

I coulda sworn I saw you say you had a .63 in that thread...

Well sports fans.

I'll post up the dyno sheet tomorow.... However-

I ended up making 245 odd rwkw on 98 at 20psi (that drops off to 18psi at 8000rpm) from my 5557 .63 exh housing. All the usual supporting mods, no major restrictions.

I was a little dissapointed. For the lag I would have expected 255/260ish rwkw at that boost level.

It seems high boost is needed for the numbers with these turbo's. I just didn't want to run anymore boost on a stock 100k rb25.

I'll be going to a td06...

J.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...