Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a set of ti rods but if i did not i would probably be going with these trick titanium rods..for the price i dont think they can be beaten , cheaper than pauter or pankl and still have exceptional quality and finish.

http://www.tricktita...connecting-rods

Now i just wish DART would manufacture an aftermarket tall deck RB based block that could be taken out to 91mm with .250 cylinder wall thickness.

I mean if they already produce a stronger aftermarket honda block then surely to god they can do an almighty RB26 based block.

http://www.dartheads.com/

At the same time if they would take the SR20VE vvl head design and apply the same technology to a absolute killer RB head .

Mmmmm ...my ultimate would be 91mm bore & 91mm stroke = 3.55L RB35VETT , now just give me a variable valve timing & variable valve lift (same as v-tec) mega head, with a pair of borg warner efr's.

Ohh i think a hollinger would have to be on the cards to cope with the above combolaugh.gif

Edited by ezy_09s

At 400+ grams those Trick rods are fairly heavy.

I picked up a big block Ti rod once and i thought it was made of plastic it was that light!

Im pretty sure an RB30 Ti rod is under 300grams. I will need someone to confirm though *cough*

My Ultimate engine combo keeps changing every time i read this thread now :)

I have a set of ti rods but if i did not i would probably be going with these trick titanium rods..for the price i dont think they can be beaten , cheaper than pauter or pankl and still have exceptional quality and finish.

http://www.tricktita...connecting-rods

Now i just wish DART would manufacture an aftermarket tall deck RB based block that could be taken out to 91mm with .250 cylinder wall thickness.

I mean if they already produce a stronger aftermarket honda block then surely to god they can do an almighty RB26 based block.

http://www.dartheads.com/

At the same time if they would take the SR20VE vvl head design and apply the same technology to a absolute killer RB head .

Mmmmm ...my ultimate would be 91mm bore & 91mm stroke = 3.55L RB35VETT , now just give me a variable valve timing & variable valve lift (same as v-tec) mega head, with a pair of borg warner efr's.

Ohh i think a hollinger would have to be on the cards to cope with the above combolaugh.gif

See my post re Bullet's Billet block.

the problem with a tall deck mega strong cast iron block would be the massive weight increse.

DART's 9.2" Deck "clevor" block is something like 30-40kgs heavier than a standard Cleveland block and around 20kgs heavier than Fords Nascar cleveland block and thats at standard deck height the 9.5" deck blocks are heavier again.

But if they did do a 91mm bore block I would run something silly like a 65mm stroke crank, super light rods and pistons and spin the bitch to 12,000+rpm using a large port billet 5 valve head.

I have a set of ti rods but if i did not i would probably be going with these trick titanium rods..for the price i dont think they can be beaten , cheaper than pauter or pankl and still have exceptional quality and finish.

http://www.tricktita...connecting-rods

Now i just wish DART would manufacture an aftermarket tall deck RB based block that could be taken out to 91mm with .250 cylinder wall thickness.

I mean if they already produce a stronger aftermarket honda block then surely to god they can do an almighty RB26 based block.

http://www.dartheads.com/

At the same time if they would take the SR20VE vvl head design and apply the same technology to a absolute killer RB head .

Mmmmm ...my ultimate would be 91mm bore & 91mm stroke = 3.55L RB35VETT , now just give me a variable valve timing & variable valve lift (same as v-tec) mega head, with a pair of borg warner efr's.

Ohh i think a hollinger would have to be on the cards to cope with the above combolaugh.gif

I just finished porting a p12 20v head for a sr20

Went to the dyno it made 400 at the wheels at 8800

Turbo was to small but it didnt stop pulling till after 9

i watched a documentary on the bugatti veyron - that is a beast & a real marvel at cutting technology

titanium rods, w16 with 2 banks, 10 radiators, 20k to change tyres lol - sorry off topic but that engine would have to qualify as the best imo quad turbo

back onto rb's :)

-10's are fantastic, so is the rips racing sump kit!

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been thinking about this a fair bit lately aswell. Well since I bought my car 2 years ago lol. Anyway at the moment I think mine would look something like this

- 26/30

- Nitto 3.2 stroker kit

- HKS V-Cam for inlet side. Not sure what people do on exhaust side when running V-Cam

- Full Race twinscroll manifold

- BorgWarner EFR Series turbo. 7670 i think it's called. Good for 700hp.

- Dry Sump

- Hollinger

mmm one day...

If i were going to go to that trouble I would throw the ford engine in the harbour and grab the nissan 4.8 with a brian crower stroker kit.

Neither of them address the thread topic however.

Its about RB engines, You know, the ones that actually bolt in to skylines.

RB48 stroker...that would be nuts. You could run a T70 or T88 on that. Anyone put the 4.8 into a skyline?

What Defines an RB ?

Are we talking OEM Head and Cylinder Castings ?

Stock Displacement ?

We need scope before you can really start spending imaginary money !

I took it as RB block and head. Whatever you do to it is fair game?

I took it as RB block and head. Whatever you do to it is fair game?

Yeah I agree.

Fineline,

http://www.bulletcylinderheads.com.au/billetblocks.php

Here is the link as per our discussion at BNR the other night.

If I recall correctly they are in the 11k region. Twas posted up a while ago and someone got in contact with them re cost. Pretty expensive but if we're talking the ultimate RB then surely that has to be included.

They should have used their smarts and built a billet 30 block that would bolt directly to the gtr sump....Winnah!

You need to put liners in the alloy block anyway so may as well make a spacer and re-create a high deck but over 3L displacement.

emthup.gif

Thats the RB48DET in action. Modified 4.8 litre with turbo setup. Patrol trucks running 12 second quarters up hill. That is the ultimate RB. Just pop that in a GTR - invincible.

Sadly it isnt an rb. Have you seen one in the flesh, they stand about 150/200 mil taller than the good old rb engine. Would be a bear to fit in a skyline.

In saying that it could probably be done. I ran in to a guy with an xr6 turbo ford engine in a 33 a while back. They are a big engine too. Bonnet mods required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...