Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My tyres are 245/45/R17. According this this chart I should hit the speed I recall by redline.

A quick google suggests factory size for an R33 GTS-T is 225/50R16 or 205/55R36 - and your new rim/tyre combo doesn't have the same rolling diameter as factory - it's 3.3% out, and that obviously affects your speedo - it would read 100kph when you're actually doing 103.3kph - ie: reading low.

Still, doesn't sound quite right that it's this far out at 60, but I'm sure it's a contributing factor ...

I really don't know. Coming up the road earlier today, I was just sitting there watching my KM sit at about 58 and the revs increase.

I already understand the concept of how things work in relation to speed of engine to the wheels vs power is how quickly you get through the gear.

Ill take it out for a quick boot and check what shits what. Ill do it safely though, rather that watch the cluster Ill just use my hand controller to record the max data logged by the end of the gear, the clear it then try it to 6krpm, then clear it, 5krpm. ill get an indication of where this shits at.

You will reach the same speed in any given gear irrelivant of how fast you get there. So. Slowly build your speed to redline. this will illuminate clutch slip as you won't be boosting and bringing too much power through clutch causing it to slip.

That way if you are able to increase your speed whilst going to redline slowly, it may be a clutch slipping problem (as it only occurs on power). If your speed still stops at that rpm whilst your doing this method, something else may be afoot.

best way to diagnose a slipping clutch is to get on a highway or similar, chuck it in 5th and put your foot down, peak torque(3-4000rpm will do it) in 5th is the most strain you'll ever put on the clutch, if its rooted you'll see/hear the revs climibing quicker than they should be

i would say you have one of the gay R33 ecu's. I doubt that you would not be able to tell that your clutch is slipping. anyway its an easy test to find out if your clutch is shot, do it.

Otherwise, as i was saying, you have one of those conservative ecu's that go really rich above a certain airflow. Mine would rev to about4.5- 5000rpm n then it would not make any more power.

I cant remember what ecu thread this was covered in but i wouldnt waste your dyno time just to find out that the ecu has its thumb in its arse...

With all the stage 1 mods iv gone from about 150hp at the wheels to 300hpatw just from a tune. Stock ecu's are f*kd and god knows what they get up to when you throw on an exhaust, front mount n boost on the stock ecu. they seem very variable how they handle it. Some go alright, others just see the extra flow n throw a hissy. Good luck...

Making no more power above certain rpm doesnt mean you won't increase speed.

And it's called rich and retard. All the 33 ecu's do it, just to different degrees. Ecu is seeing figures that it see's as being dangerous and adjusts to bring it to a safe level

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
    • Short inlet runners cost quite a bit. Dulls off the off-boost torque, and delays boost onset, because arrival of boost is driven by gas flow is a product of the ability to flow air which is torque. This is the reason that the stock manifolds have longer runners. On a 3L, or bigger, you can usually accept the compromise of giving away some torque because the extra capacity gives you a little extra to waste. But on a smaller motor, there's not a lot there to start with. Example, I swapped RB20 out of my R32, 25NeoDET in its place. The "wall of torque" that I experienced afterwards made it all worthwhile. That's because I came from RB20 land where torque is not a thing. But I would not do anything, anything at all, to reduce the low/mid torque I have now, because I remember what it is like to not have it!
    • Really, low/midrange torque goes really bad?? I want decent acceleration, maybe I use a stock rb25det neo manifold?    
×
×
  • Create New...