Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently had a viper paging alarm installed on my R32 GTS-T Type-M, I know that this alarm is capable of a turbo-timing function but none of the installers in Adelaide would set this up. Since then I have purchased a second hand Blitz turbo timer which already has R32 ignition looms, other than these looms there is two wires, I believe one is an earth and the other is for handbrake cutoff. Would I be better off getting the viper turbo timer going? Would the installation of the Blitz timer interfere with the alarm or compromise the vehicles security in any way? Would the immobilizers stops the timer from functioning? Where do you actually run the handbrake cutoff wire to?Cheers in advance,

Luke

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356357-turbo-timer-vs-alarm/
Share on other sites

Given turbo timers are illegal, I'm not surprised none of the installers would set it up.

ADR 25 requires that the normal function of the engine only occurs when the ignition lock is in the engine on position

Really - do you need a turbo-timer, is it that hard to not drive the car on-boost for the last 60 seconds of your journey?

Installing turbo timers in conjunction with an alarm is a pain in the ass. Because the alarm is trying to arm the car and enable the immobiliser but the car is still running with the turbo timer. So you have to set it up with relays so the alarm can be armed with the turbo timer still running.

kinda pointless anyway. the alarm is probably the one I think and I could probably roll start the car quite easily. leave the timer in there and it will make it a LOT easier for me to hotwire it and piss of with the car.

think about what I just said.

any car security I do the timer GETS TOSSED. the customer hasa little say in it.

I use alarms that will drop 3 or more circuits and are capable of a timer function IF the customer requests it.

the ADR is quite correct. that is a defect notice if you get ont eh wrong side of someone. sit with the car for a extra minute - easier and cheaper.

Installing turbo timers in conjunction with an alarm is a pain in the ass. Because the alarm is trying to arm the car and enable the immobiliser but the car is still running with the turbo timer. So you have to set it up with relays so the alarm can be armed with the turbo timer still running.

you mean like this:

183197_10150190491279942_187393709941_8976268_2143027_n.jpg

cut that one out about a week and a half ago. thats what 90% of them look like when they try to plonk a timer into an alarm.

it DOES NOT look like that now.

Hahaha yeah that's it. For reference I don't know how to make them work together in harmony but I have had it explained to me years ago and I remember there was a shitload of extra wiring and relays that needed to be used.

Personally I hate alarms and if I could go back I would have never installed mine. Nothing but dramas. Fuel pump kill switch is the best anti theft install.

nice rats nest , chris..lol

suprised the car worked at all.hahaha

turbo timers= defect.

alarms that have built in turbo timers= defect if used /hooked up

Iphone app that starts the car/ etc = defect as well.(for now)

just sit in the car for 30-60 seconds, dont fang it then shut it off.

my alarm works with the turbo timer u need to get the right alarm and it was easy to put in and didnt have to do anything extra, cut the fuel and start and shit but no relays or hooking alarm up with turbo timer or anything need to go to the right people, alarms and turbo timers i fit all the time but

theres an app for that????? lol

and i got mine comlied, RWC and regoed with a turbo timer.....lol

and my little bro has a few mild issues with his alarm and turbo timer getting confused with each other too. but he normally leaves the stereo running so the sub sets the alarm off anyways!!

mine apparently has a factory alarm??? says it on the window, and ive managed to set it off while walking away from the car on the way to the shops (looked like a right twat standing next to a car with the horn and lights going off, madly pressing buttons to get it to shutup)....fudged if i know how it works (if it works), but i know it makes noise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...