Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey

the other day i made a phone call to CES (Custom exhaust systems) and they told me that an R33 gtst skyline has stock 143kw at the wheels. they than told me that they have an exhaust system worth, $1900 that will give the car dyno proven 180 to 188kw at the wheels, and after that installing a kn or decent air filter, and turning up the boost to around 11 or 12 they can produce up too 200rkw, do u think this is true, because they say they have dyno proven results and if it is than the car would have to be pushing high to medium 13 second times, wouldnt u think? can someone shead some light on this topic becasue im sure if its true than alot of poeple will want their exhaust.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/
Share on other sites

CES are very good, the only complaint I have heard of is the price, but as the old saying goes "you get what you pay for". And I think in this case from what I heard its true. Dunno about there power increases though, 200 rwkw could be achieved with their list plus a decent intercooler and aftermarket ECU (powerFC). 200 rwkw without even a SAFC seems a little far fetched to me, I am pretty sure around the 200rwkw mark is limit for standard turbos anyway, give or take a few. Depends on the condition of your engine also, so many variables!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/#findComment-712231
Share on other sites

would you stop f.ucking stop double posting everything you want to say on here on different sections, and in different posts?!

...kind of annoying, and its not going to get any better response. In fact you'll probably get less so because it shits people.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/#findComment-712233
Share on other sites

Generally speaking for a 33, and gauging by other members results, would I be wrong in guestimating this?...

130-135rwkW - Stock

140-150rwkW - Full 3" Exh & Air filter

160-180rwkW - Full 3" Exh, Air filter/Feed/Partition, FMIC, 12PSI, Fuel Pump, SAFC.

180-200rwkW - Full 3" Exh, Air filter/Feed/Partition, FMIC, 12PSI, Fuel Pump, SAFC/PowerFC, Exh Cam Gear.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/#findComment-712690
Share on other sites

interesting results...

i would assume that 40kw increase is not at the wheels

intercooler, 3in double dump and increased boost from the higher flow would probably give 200kw

$2000 would almost get you a intercooler installed and maybe a catback exhuast, id spend the extra 500 and get the double dump and finish off the rest of the exhaust at EXOTIC EXHAUST.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/#findComment-717012
Share on other sites

Generally speaking for a 33, and gauging by other members results, would I be wrong in guestimating this?...

130-135rwkW - Stock

140-150rwkW - Full 3" Exh & Air filter

160-180rwkW - Full 3" Exh, Air filter/Feed/Partition, FMIC, 12PSI, Fuel Pump, SAFC.

180-200rwkW - Full 3" Exh, Air filter/Feed/Partition, FMIC, 12PSI, Fuel Pump, SAFC/PowerFC, Exh Cam Gear.

I doubt you would be able to get a GTST into a true 200RWKW without changing the turbo, and if you could it is just a matter of time until you need a new turbo anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/#findComment-717017
Share on other sites

I doubt you would be able to get a GTST into a true 200RWKW without changing the turbo, and if you could it is just a matter of time until you need a new turbo anyway.

definintely not something that would last or recommend however what i suggested would be the absolute minimum to get even close to 200kw

sorry if i mislead n e one

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/#findComment-717305
Share on other sites

i dont think it would be hard to crack 200rwkw on the stock turbo. I got 181rwkw atm with the mods in my sig on 10psi, and i reckon with a exh cam gear and 12-13psi and a bit of tuning would get me 200rwkw. The turbo is fine at the moment i dont see how an extra 20kw would kill it. But i do agree that it will reach its "safe" limits then and i will look into highflowing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35678-what-mods-too-do/#findComment-717708
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...