Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am currently undertaking a big overhaul of my 33 GTST and part of that has been adding a new interior. While I had everything out I decided I may as well do all the soundproofing I have read so much about and well......went a little crazy and have pretty much covered every space I can think of within the cabin including the roof lining and behing the back seat.

The only thing is I have mostly used 10mm closed cell sound proofing foam (Except for the front doors which has both foad and proper dynamat)and this has been glued onto the car using contact adhesive so it will NOT come off IMO.

Some pics so you can see what I am talking about

IMG_0328.jpg

IMG_0384.jpg

IMG_0385.jpg

IMG_0386.jpg

IMG_0387.jpg

IMG_0389.jpg

IMG_0391.jpg

Now I am at the stage of cleaning up the boot and decised to line it in the foam as well because believe it or not it actuall does kill off a LOT of road noise.

My mrs reminded my that I have two 12" subs in a box in our spare room which although almost brand new have been sitting around for about 7 years. They are nothing special but I thought they would add an extra bit of bass/low down sound if I was to throw them in the boot (With extra amp of course)

As I am really not that well educated with car stereo stuff could the knowledgeable people around here please advise me as to wether I am wasting my time because of all the extra soond proofing between the boot and the cabin (back seat area)puuting the subs in the boot. Will I actually be able to hear them or have I sound proofed myself into a corner so to speak.

Thanks

D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/357065-am-i-wasting-my-time/
Share on other sites

I'd be inclined to sound proof the whole boot (if weight isn't a question) and leave between the boot and cabin. In some areas of high panel resonance I'd heard of people slicking weights to the resonating area with a strong 3M tape to change the resonant frequency to something that isn't as affected by road noise. Dunno if it works but, haven't seen any true test results.

Thanks mate but that's the problem, the area between the cabin and the boot is already soundproofed and the foam has been stuck on to the bit behind the back seat with contact adhesive.....bloody strong stuff that will never let go.

Im just unsure wether I have blocked out too much of noise that will come from the boot to make the subs usefull

I can tell you that you have done a good job of it. that siad IF you can get the foam off - do so. if not - pull the rear speakers out. that will help things to a point.

A heat gun will remove anything :P

Then eucalyptus will remove the sticky crap.

However there is no harm in trying it out how you have it. - I've always wondered if you'd get superior bass (SPL wise) if you had the box mounted deep in the boot, subs facing backwards in a ported box with ports tuned to come through the parcel shelf. :) Doo it :D

Only way you'd truly know (again SPL wise) would have been doing a road test with sound proofing everywhere cept between cab and boot, with a dB meter. Then testing again WITH proofing between can and boot. I like how thorough you've been, the mid and top end should sound great. Get road tyres that focus on low noise as well? :)

Edited by GTRPowa

I can tell you that you have done a good job of it. that siad IF you can get the foam off - do so. if not - pull the rear speakers out. that will help things to a point.

Thanks for the kind words I was wondering wether I overdid it as I was kind of winging it!!

Correct me if I'm wrong cause I am in no way well educated with car sound but wouldn't removing the rears kind of make things sound uneven?

Maybe I'll just chuck the box in and see how it goes, no biggy as I have it here anyway and it does have two of the port thingys built in. I might be able to rig something up to get the ports comming out at the parcel tray what do you think?

GTRPowa, forgot to mention earlier when you mentioned soundproofing the boot as well, I will definately be doing it. That's the good thing about the foam, it ways bugger all. I bought around 7metres of the 10mm and 5.5m of the 5mm and all up it widths less than 5kg. For example the two front doors in the proper stuff is heavier that the entire car lined in foam including a second layer inside the front doors.

That's the good thing about the foam, it ways bugger all. I bought around 7metres of the 10mm and 5.5m of the 5mm and all up it widths less than 5kg.

...and can't hear screams coming from the boot (whilst disposing of wife who should have reminded you earlier about spare 12" subs)??? :P

...and can't hear screams coming from the boot (whilst disposing of wife who should have reminded you earlier about spare 12" subs)??? :P

Hahaha, exactly Terry.

I forgot all about the subs it's been so long. I've done such a good job of keeping the car noise out of the cabin that I dunno wether I want to go backwards for the sake of a bit of bass that will ultimately produce rattles and vibrations????

Maybe I should just pit some good 6x9's in the back for the extra bass

I did exactly what your doing now to my Beetle yrs ago. it made a huge difference in sound and heat inside the car (external oil coolers and thermos under the back parcel shelf and solid mounted engine and gearbox). it made it almost bearable in daily use.

go the subs, and leave some nice 6's in the back. 6x9's are over rated. and aparently a bit of a squeeze in a liner without making a whole new shelf or spacers etc.(don't cut the parcel shelf itself)

Edited by boiracer

a sound proof car is fine, bass is non directional below certain freq. you will still feel it shake the car, you can vent it it behind the rear guards between the boot and rear seat sides, if your creative. or remove the rear speakers and replace the grills again. then you will hear it fine. my car is even more soundproof then that ,

I moved my rear speakers mids and tweeters over and ported (tuned properly)the bass thru the factory holes right from the sub box. so if your creative you can do it with ease. notice the rear deck is now fiberglass molding of a factory one then modified . but no metal was cut in the car for any of the system. so not defectable !!!

6x9s suck, and cutting the holes is a structual defect !!!

Dave074

What you have done is looking good.

It is not overkill; I have done way more deadening on our 33 than you did.

I would highly recommend removing the oval shape panel behind the back seat, there is a huge difference to the amount of sound that you can get out of the boot :-)

I have seen a few people mount 6x9’s in the back but remember do not cut the rear panel. Also if you are going to mount the subs in the boot give the 6x9’s a miss. A set of 6 inch will be more than enough for rear fill.

90% of the time I do not have rear speakers in at all, now that I have to get the baby seat in the back they are pretty much only in at shows.

Anyway keep up the good work

Simon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...