Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Aaron has found the limits of his custom 3 inch mild steel system and has upgraded to an 80mm kaki R so his old one is up for grabs. He wants $500 ono.

Aaron(NM35): 0403 579 121

Throw him an offer, I want it gone from my driveway. :dry:

Thanks.

post-63525-0-13888600-1300442715_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-34212500-1300442725_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-80983600-1300442737_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/357889-m35-stagea-dump-back-system-3-inch/
Share on other sites

sunday :) goodbye gearbox lol

come have a geez if ya want!

Hey Aaron, how loud is this one? Not as loud as your new one I guess, but is it a young fellas exhaust or family man's exhaust?

Hell yeah... What time?

im getting there with scott around 9am. so should be sometime after that

Hey Aaron, how loud is this one? Not as loud as your new one I guess, but is it a young fellas exhaust or family man's exhaust?

it got sound tested at 91 DB on "bark back" from 3800rpm so its noticable. but not TOO loud.

it was leaking, but all it needed was a new gasket

This exhaust has magnaflow mufflers and an EPA legal Catco Catalytic converter.

Bolts directly to the Stock dump or Scottys dump!

need this gona asap!

shipping my prove to be a little deer.

im happy to help out with shipping if interstate.

to Perth it was $260 (which is rediculous)

preferrably pick up in SE Melb, or i can drive it to you..

or you may have to pay for shipping.

Hi Aaron, I have the M35 Axis 03, I have been a long time reader of this forum and think you car sounds incredible (think I read somewhere 0-100 in 4.5. Insane!)

Your current offer has brought me out of hiding, so just to clarify...

My car (currently stock) produces around 200kw at the fly so maybe 130awkw?

Are you saying that with this exhaust and an aggressive tune I can achieve 230kw at the wheels?

PS: what is "Bark Back"

Hi Aaron, I have the M35 Axis 03, I have been a long time reader of this forum and think you car sounds incredible (think I read somewhere 0-100 in 4.5. Insane!)

Your current offer has brought me out of hiding, so just to clarify...

My car (currently stock) produces around 200kw at the fly so maybe 130awkw?

Are you saying that with this exhaust and an aggressive tune I can achieve 230kw at the wheels?

PS: what is "Bark Back"

0-100 in 4.5? whered you read that? we have a low throttle restriction which would allow it i dont think..

this exhaust has been proven to flow up to 230 kws with the supporting mods.

we know the suction pipe max's at 200kw atw. and so does the standard FMIC and the dump pipe.

Bark Back is when you hold the rev's at 3800rpm(our EPA Test Rev) and release the accelerator. the rev's dropping is louder than increasing..

it had something like 91db or 92db which was border line legal.

but this exhaust allowed me to run 230kw on 98RON.

if your interested pm me.

Hi Aaron, I have the M35 Axis 03, I have been a long time reader of this forum and think you car sounds incredible (think I read somewhere 0-100 in 4.5. Insane!)

Your current offer has brought me out of hiding, so just to clarify...

My car (currently stock) produces around 200kw at the fly so maybe 130awkw?

Are you saying that with this exhaust and an aggressive tune I can achieve 230kw at the wheels?

PS: what is "Bark Back"

When Aaron says up to 230awkw, he means the exhaust is capable of flowing that number...not just bolt the exhaust on and you'll get 230awkw....u'll need all the supporting mods PLUS a tune.

our car does around 140awkw stock I believe...or was it 145? Its about 30% drivetrain loss for us...

I highly doubt we can do 4.5sec 0-100 with our lame throttle restriction...best I've done (timed using a phone app/GPS, so not sure accurate) was 5.3sec. This is on LPG @ 250awkw...and by all means I'm not the best driver either!

Edited by ironpaw

When Aaron says up to 230awkw, he means the exhaust is capable of flowing that number...not just bolt the exhaust on and you'll get 230awkw....u'll need all the supporting mods PLUS a tune.

our car does around 140awkw stock I believe...or was it 145? Its about 30% drivetrain loss for us...

I highly doubt we can do 4.5sec 0-100 with our lame throttle restriction...best I've done (timed using a phone app/GPS, so not sure accurate) was 5.3sec. This is on LPG @ 250awkw...and by all means I'm not the best driver either!

lol its auto how could you stuff it up.

i wish i could do it in 4 seconds though. would be pretty awesome.

SOooo whos buying the exhaust?

the transmission loss doesnt cost 30% of total power.

it costs around 55kw, no matter how much power you have :)

not if you have a lock up clutch mod :ph34r:

i gain about 20-30 kw on that 55kw loss perhaps?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes that’s what im trying to decide. Should I do stock gtt box or enclosed or open pod. 
    • Also, I note OP is in Melbourne, which begs the question... are you aware of how illegal your car will be with a turbo, and intercooler and any sort of filter change? I don't know how you can get past the "2 intake mods" "rule" that seems to exist in Vic. Fully engineered might or might not get you there.
    • If you have a turbo... then the ducting holes I used to feed the pod are not available because your intercooler likely uses them. If you have an intercooler, your IAT's are going to be goverened by how good your intercooler setup is. I'm yet to really see anyone check IAT with a snorkel/boxed pod/proper CAI versus and unshielded pod. It would be interesting! But I suspect that the differences would not be so noticeable as if you were N/A as the intercooler is where the air is being cooled.. and out in front where the FMIC would be is a pretty good spot for it.. When I was turbo I pushed the stock GTT box as far as I could and made some pretty good power out of it, and noticed on the street I never made the same power/boost. Then I did a before and after run with a pod filter versus the box and picked up about 9PSI from the same boost duty cycle and about 50KW instantly. I never ran the stock box again, and recently removed it for my N/A setup. The box is restrictive to a degree - Even with the V8 setup I noticed I picked up power by removing the box completely, so punching holes from the bottom of it to get air from the passenger guard *helps* but the most effective one in my case was simply having the ducts, a pod, and no box around it. In my experience, *more* air was better than cold air. The air (with ducts) will be cooled off as you start moving, and especially if you start moving fast (a race track). It actually moves around quite a bit as you can see.  
    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
×
×
  • Create New...