Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hasn't accepted yet.... :( Frowny face

oy, i will add you :P

[email protected]

thought i was camera proof until i gunned it through an orange on the westlnk the other night and 'flash-flash' ...going to have to research those ghost plates, pretty sure it was the speed not the red light.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/4/#findComment-5734178
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Unless your speedo starts eating the gear drive, you don't need to calibrate them, this is why they have to be between 0 and 10% over read at any time for any configuration of tyre approved by the manufacturer.

Most cars over read by at least 3% on brand new tyres. Oh and new to worn out tyres will alter reading by approx 0.5%...

That doesn't help Import drivers or older cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/4/#findComment-5736920
Share on other sites

That doesn't help Import drivers or older cars.

Perhaps not, but if a speedo becomes more inaccurate over time shouldn't recalibration be part of routine maintainance? I guess it's much like adjusdting headlights, something very important that everyone overlooks as it isn't regulated.

At the end of the day, it's up to the road user to obey the rules. If you get caught breaking those rules and your only excuse is "lol, soz my speedo is out" it is very likely you will end up with a speeding fine AND a defect ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/4/#findComment-5736947
Share on other sites

SMH states that the ADRs specify a 10% margin for error either way, yet the actual ADRs say that the margin for error only applies that the car is always going equal to or less than the speed displayed on the speedo...

I wonder what else in that article is incorrect?

TL;DR - Sensationalist journalism

Because the ADR changed in 2006 - and ADRs aren't retrospective. So vehicles produced before 2006 happily comply with the old ADR and the new ADR does not apply to them.

The old pre-2006 ADR stated (loosely) +-10% accuracy at speeds above 40kph (I beleive), the new ADR changes that. However, how many cars are on the road that were build pre-2006? The new rules essentially disallow under-reading, and permit over-reading by up to 4kmh + 10% (there's a formula involved, I believe someone has already posted this).

The other thing to consider is all the other factors that will impact speedometer readings -

+ tyre wear

+ tyre pressure

+ vehicle load

And that ignores more human factors like many speedos only displaying increments of 5kph, or particularly sized/shaped speedometer needles.

Unfortunately, the politicians really don't give a damn - it's all about revenue raising, not facts or 'real world'.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/4/#findComment-5737147
Share on other sites

It'll be interesting see if as a consequence of <1km/hr tolerance, the stats of rear-enders goes up.

And they probably don't do a count of those anyway.

Rear-enders are probably already on the rise - not just from wet roads which has always been the case, but from texting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/4/#findComment-5737202
Share on other sites

It'll be interesting see if as a consequence of <1km/hr tolerance, the stats of rear-enders goes up.

And they probably don't do a count of those anyway.

Rear-enders are probably already on the rise - not just from wet roads which has always been the case, but from texting.

Funny you mention this...

P Platers have the STRICTEST laws in regards to speeding on them... Yet they're the lowest cause of rear end accidents... So by that fact alone, it should technically reduce...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/4/#findComment-5737367
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...