Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so i have my internals at the machine shop an i was giving the option like 5 times to knife edge my crank, and i said no 5 times, but know im kinda of thinking bout it b/c of the fact this is an all-out motor, but its gonna be daily driver. im getting the crankshaft raced balanced to 11k rpms, i have spool rods, mahle pistons(8.5:1) rb26 head BC valve train with 280 cams. my goal is 700-800 whp( dyno queen #'s) but for everyday like 600 hp. im using e85 with t72 turbo.

The real question is, is knife edging the crank bad on daily driven cars? what is the down side of it? im not worried bout the cost of it, will it drive alot different the reg crank?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358943-rb30det-block-building-concerns/
Share on other sites

If you want big power you need to balance the crankshaft (and other components) and get a quality harmonic balancer. How can that do any harm??? Why would it drive any differently at moderate speeds/power levels?

so i have my internals at the machine shop an i was giving the option like 5 times to knife edge my crank, and i said no 5 times, but know im kinda of thinking bout it b/c of the fact this is an all-out motor, but its gonna be daily driver. im getting the crankshaft raced balanced to 11k rpms, i have spool rods, mahle pistons(8.5:1) rb26 head BC valve train with 280 cams. my goal is 700-800 whp( dyno queen #'s) but for everyday like 600 hp. im using e85 with t72 turbo.

The real question is, is knife edging the crank bad on daily driven cars? what is the down side of it? im not worried bout the cost of it, will it drive alot different the reg crank?

I haven't done this but from what I understand knife edging the crank feels like having a lighter flywheel - IE it will build up revs quicker but also lose them quicker too (which is usually a bit of a negative for a daily). Also there is less parasitic drag when the crank moves through the air/oil so you might gain a bit of power too.At the end of the day its really going to be a subjective thing whether you want it done to your car or not as no one but you will know if it feels OK as a daily. Sorry not too helpful.

Edited by *LOACH*

If you want big power you need to balance the crankshaft (and other components) and get a quality harmonic balancer. How can that do any harm??? Why would it drive any differently at moderate speeds/power levels?

i am actually doing the balancing of crankshaft, rods, and pistons. but have crankshaft balanced to handle 10k of rpms aswell

I haven't done this but from what I understand knife edging the crank feels like having a lighter flywheel - IE it will build up revs quicker but also lose them quicker too (which is usually a bit of a negative for a daily). Also there is less parasitic drag when the crank moves through the air/oil so you might gain a bit of power too.At the end of the day its really going to be a subjective thing whether you want it done to your car or not as no one but you will know if it feels OK as a daily. Sorry not too helpful.

what do you mean by lose revs quickly??? i was thinking bout just going with it but didnt know if the car would drive different from a standard crankshaft

The money would be better spent on a forged crankshaft that will ACTUALLY rev to 11k rpm. Your engineer can only balance it to 0 anyway, your steel crankshaft is not going to survive very long after 8500rpm.

Not only do you risk destroying the crankshaft due to the very aggressive nature of the machine that cuts it, but the benefit of having a knife edged crank is minimal, like have a lightened flywheel. The cost far outweighs the benefit IMO.

The money would be better spent on a forged crankshaft that will ACTUALLY rev to 11k rpm. Your engineer can only balance it to 0 anyway, your steel crankshaft is not going to survive very long after 8500rpm.

Not only do you risk destroying the crankshaft due to the very aggressive nature of the machine that cuts it, but the benefit of having a knife edged crank is minimal, like have a lightened flywheel. The cost far outweighs the benefit IMO.

ooohh thanks for the tip. i was planning on using it till about 8-8500 actually that u said that. well if its not that much of a gainer than i may just skip that. what about micro polishing??

what do you mean by lose revs quickly??? i was thinking bout just going with it but didnt know if the car would drive different from a standard crankshaft

The drivetrain will have less inertia therefore when you take off from a standing start or change gears you will have to be more delicate with throttle control in order to keep the revs up otherwise it will stall. Could be a hassle if you drive in traffic a lot. Listen to F1 cars (which have no flywheels and low rotating masses) as soon the throttle is closed the revs drop - much quicker than a street car. Its just a different driving experience which you may or may not like. I know its probably difficult but the best way to get the experience is drive someones car who has a light flywheel.

  • 3 weeks later...

has anyone used 280 cams in rb26 head? what size turbo and is it worth the head replacement parts( valves, springs, retainers) i also have 1mm oversize valves. should this flow pretty good??? im thinking bout porting the head out myself but havent decided on it yet what do you think???

My mate has 280s in his 30DET with a T04Z. IMO they are too big, it has none of the low down 30 torque. Boy does it scream to 8500rpm and want to keep going though.

does it make nice power and on what type of psi?? since i have these should i get a bigger turbo??? im thinking bout goin with s372 borg warner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...