Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe its quite close if not the same as the Nismo pump, given they have supported 380rwkw before.

although its anyone's guess after 10 years as most people have fuel pump issues once you get to the '10 year' or so with any skyline. :)

Well yes and no mate. For mild mods you should be totally fine...

However it always pays to get the car onto a dyno, check AFR's & fuel pressure just to be sure it is indeed all A-OK.

I mean it should be, but nothing is ever certain when dealing with 10yr+ old pumps. Often people change then just for piece of mind as Nismo pumps are only $300 or so

Also nismo speclist here states Nismo fuel pump, flowing 4.6 l/min at 3 bar pressure, has 25% more flow than factory pump. This gives us a figure of 4.6/1.25 = 3.68 l/min, or 220.8 l/hour.

Edited by Legionnaire

standard 34 GTR pump is no where near a nismo pump. nismo pumps are 276l/ph (same across 32/33/34). standard GTR pump are 195/lph (again same across 32/33/34). You can get a bit more out of them with a direct power feed as they flow a bit more at higher voltage but they are a long way from a nismo (flows 50% more).

If the GTR factory pump can make 380rwkw/20psi (Snowmans car did, everyone assumed aftermarket pump, which it turned out not to be).

It can't be flowing 195L/ph.

My point was it would most certainly appear that what is on the Japanese spec sheet is perhaps not what is going on in reality.

Someone have both handy? Would make for an interesting test! :merli:

^ Now that's the kinda shit I'm talking about.

70psi its flowing ~235L/hr. 40ltr/hr extra @ 70psi is hardly just a "bit more" via voltage :)

Clearly the Nissan OEM is spec'd down with ~250L/ph @ base pressure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...