Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Don't know what the Stagea one is like to install, but obviously it would be different. Just as the Silvia one is different.

The Walbro is a lot easier to install than the Bosch that is for sure. Definetely not as easy as the Tomei/Nismo one given that you literally pull the entire old fuel pump assembely out of the fuel tank and put the new unit in and plug it back in and you are done.

The Walbros are a lot more sensitive to flow rates vs voltage and therefore some cars require rewiring to ensure they get 14V.

As I said, if you are confident in what you are doing get the cheaper fuel pump. I am just saying the Tomei/Nismo is worth the money given how reliable and easy the install is.

Your choice.

Heard about the rewiring a lot, from where to where do I need to rewire - sounds like another pain in the a.. I think the walbros come with the short bits of wiring from pump to top of assemply plastic cylinder thingy.. Not keen on rewiring other bits of the car mate!

Everyone I know with a walbro pump just says they would not get one again..... I dont have any experience with them so can't really say they are bad, but going off what others have said I wouldnt buy one

They are not purely for a drag/high power setup. I have run one for nearly 3 years, from when the car was basically stock just before I got a tune till now, and I cannot fault the Tomei pump at all. It is near silent, has never had fuel supply issues, and only took about half an hour to install

Bosch pumps are noisey and have pickup issues

Walbro, from what I know, need a direct power feed because they only provide there rated fuel supply at 15v or something?

Like I said I dont have experience with these two, but just saying that I've never regretted paying a little bit extra for the tomei pump

[

Anyone else think I need a new fuel pump?? Now I'm confused on whether I need a Bosch 044 or 040..

i dont think you need a fuel pump, i KNOW you need a fuel pump.

a 10+ year old fuel pump is just asking for trouble when you are giving it stick, especially if you have modified the car

just reading the Nissan Silvia forums, everyones recommending the walbro over the bosch

of course they are :rolleyes:

For this guys power goals the walbro will be fine and wont require rewiring, I had one in my old gtst (270kw) and know plenty of ppl that have had them and had no trouble running them for several years with decent power. My best mate runs one in his 240kw evo 8 mr and has no troubles at all. As stated pay the 10 bucks extra and get the one from a vendor with the correct fitting kit so you know its genuine. There are plenty of DIY out there for fitting these fuel pumps and if your unsure ask someone thats done one or take it to your mechanic.

As for the nismo/tomei..whats the point in paying $600 odd for a fuel pump when his only going to be pumping out about 200odd rwkw...if he said 300kw i could see the point, The walbro/bosch will certainly be enough for his power. There a piece of piss to fit if you have half a braincell on mechanics or can follow one of the DIY threads.

Cheers Dan, my ultimate goal is 300rwkw - thats when I get the remaining 3 items - injectors, turbo and Z32, keep telling myself I wont waste money on these, but knowing myself, I know I will, lol..! ! So I guess the Walbro is not so bad - GAS Motorsport in Wetherill Park sell them (Walbro GSS342) for $115 -I guess thats a good price for a decent item. So it WILL support 300rwkw wont it?

And you said it for me - dont see the point in spending $600 odd for a bloody fuel pump, should be ok to fit - I did my FMIC, spark plugs, oil change and oil + fuel filters myself. Read the DIY on the Bosch 040 - seems the hard bit is putting the assembly properly back down the tank in the correct position in slot..

And Hamish, what does a 325rwkw GTS-T FEEL like on the road - compared to a baby 200rwkw?? Shits on pretty much everything? Hows the response from jab on the throttle etc..

a LOT faster ;)

I had a Walbro running 200awkw. Rewired it to full battery voltage (at least two DIY threads in here or pay someone to do it) and ran 245awkw but now upgrading for RB30. If I were you and you want 300kw down the line get a better pump now and be done with it - such as this Denso:

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Motors/Car-parts-accessories/Performance/Fuel-systems/auction-365629302.htm

ok ok so do the Bosch 040s require re-wiring as well like the Walbros, once u go over a certain power level/flow rate... faark so hard to decide ha ha.. 280-300rwkw max goal - no nismo or tomeis please, just one simple reasonable quality internal pump....

I use the Walbro, put the stock sock on the bottom of it for better fuel pickup.

I'm running 290rwkw on E_Flex (E70, so 25% more fuel needed than with PULP98) with perfect AFR's before doing the direct battery wiring, but since then have done the direct battery wiring for peice of mind.

there's a lot of walbro hate round here. But for me it seems to be working a treat!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...