Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok well im building my rb26 head and have ordered tomei 10.8mm lift cams with tomei type a springs, im just wondering how good the standard rb26 valve spring retainers are, if anyone has had problems with them failing or if i need to upgrade them. or wat upgraded ones are good to use. last thing i want is for it to drop a valve. cheers liam

Get the titanium retainers as well mate with the extra pressure of the upgraded valve springs you will split the standard retainers and i got the tomei type b valve springs and they come with the retainers.

  • 3 weeks later...

just get the supertech set up. double springs titanium retainers and good for 13mm lift. about 600 deliverd

+2

Went from another performance spring manufacture to super tech and literally went from 480rwhp too 596 rwhp.

Back to back with nothing else changed but the tune to suit th new springs that would actually work over 22 psi

  • 2 years later...

Old post, saves starting a new one

Il prob be changing my valve springs when I do my cams, I see a lot of brands like Brian Crower, hks, greddy etc that come without retainers, are the stock ones good enough for these replacement single valave springs?

Only looking at running poncams around 9.1lift

Still running standard valves but with new valve guides, seats etc

Edited by SiR_RB

To much seat pressure is not good. You need to know what it is you want first. Then build around that.

I dont see a need for so much lift. 10.5 and higher.

In short ro much seat pressure just loads up everything in line with to much stress.

Thats just my to cents.

But I guess I should have asked you what are your hp goal. Sorry

Most proberbly go type r poncams so around 250x9.1 lift,,,nothing extreme

Won't be going double valve springs as there no need for my choice of cams, just wanted to know if standard retainers will be fine with upgraded single valve springs

  • 1 month later...

Ok I got my cams now looking into valve springs

When do you need to run a titanium retainer?

How much is too much seat pressure? Is 80-90lbs seat pressure closed and about 180-190lbs open too much?

Will be running around 26-28psi boost and rev to 8200rpm

We have had GReddy springs with stock everything for years. 264 and a 272 with 9.7 lift. Used to rev it to 9500 and havent seen an issue after about 8000klms. Most of its life its spent on the dyno or the drag strip so its not being babied at all. We run 25psi apart from when its being driven to and from the dyno or drag strip ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...