Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Currently have standard gtr intercooler 50mm or so , with 2.5 inch piping on both sides.

Turbo has 4 inch inlet , plenum is 3 inch.

Exhaust is 3 inch right through off stock manifold.

337rwkw now.

If I went 80mm intercooler and 3 inch piping, what would I expect.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/359900-bigger-intercooler-and-piping/
Share on other sites

A rough guide for cooler plumbing is-

Hot side- keep the pipe diameter the same size as the turbo outlet..

Cold side- keep the pipe work a close size to the tb...

Your stock gtr cooler shouldn't hold you back for your power level, to make it a little more efficient- close the gaps up between it and the front bar and above the grill.

If your going to do anything, swap out the post cooler to tb pipe with a 3" pipe. There will be very little gain, unless you have some crazy bends in there though...

For the same money as a custom 3" cooler pipe (say $35 per bend + fab = $200 odd) buy a better set of brake pads/fluid/lines or a 3.5" muffler to see a better performance gain.

J.

Are you on E85 now?

More boost?

Did you fix the boost dropping issue from your previous runs? (dyno thread)

310rwkw @ 15psi from a 3076 is a bit unrealistic so it's looking like you've changed fuel to me (just goin off the dyno sheet)

Found it:

RB25/30 Series 1 R33

Tomei Poncams

550 top feed injectors

Plasmaman plenum 72mm throttle body

Forged internals

Haltech Sport 2000 ECU

Single 044

GT3076R low mount

I suppose the only real way to confirm if larger piping would be beneficial is to measure the pressure drop and temperature increase along the different sections of the piping. I agree with the previous post that the hot pipe will be fine, if there are gains it will be the cold pipe going to your 72mm throttle body.

I have been looking at 'infrared thermometer guns', wow they look cool. Chuck the car on a dyno and sit there pointing at different parts of the pipework measuring the temp!

Another idea I am looking at as well is to ceramic coat the cold pipe, but that will depend on the temp results you get. I was reading about an R32 GTS-T that their during the cold pipe air increased temps by 26 degrees!!

Are you on E85 now?

More boost?

Did you fix the boost dropping issue from your previous runs? (dyno thread)

310rwkw @ 15psi from a 3076 is a bit unrealistic so it's looking like you've changed fuel to me (just goin off the dyno sheet)

Also more thoughts.

Tested pressure turbo outlet & @ plenum to find out if there is a pressure drop?

And/or temp diffences? (you might have a sensor. not sure)

Also more thoughts.

Tested pressure turbo outlet & @ plenum to find out if there is a pressure drop?

And/or temp diffences? (you might have a sensor. not sure)

No, still on 98Ron pump fuel.

Don't think I'll ever go E85, I like the current setup too much.

Injectors are 570 top feed on custom rail, not 550.

Drives economically and idles like a kitten.

3.5 exhaust is tempting, but probably pointless with stock manifold, plus Db exhaust levels will increase.

There is a temp probe on the cold side.

Intercooler is fully custom made,was on it when I bought the car.

One reason why I'm looking at new ones is I'm assuming my existing one is full of oil again, after massive surge through PCV last track day. Oil was dripping out my BOV for 6 weeks, so I reckon is was drawn back into the cooler.

Already had it pulled out and flushed before, may as well replace it.

PCV now blocked.

Not really after more power gains, just curious if low down response and spool will improve.

Might try and jam a 100mm one in.

3.5 exhaust is tempting, but probably pointless with stock manifold, plus Db exhaust levels will increase.

I disagree with this, I think a 3.5 exhaust will assist you greatly. Even just the cat and catback system.

Here is info from another car:

stock 25NEO

standard exhaust manifold

3076 .82 rear .6 front cover

E85

1000cc injectors

running 27psi :whistling:

Power FC

Blits Return flow cooler

3" dump pipe, 3.5" cat and 3.5" hks catback exhaust

350rwkw

Plus, even on my lowly 270rwkw setup a dyno test without my 3" fujitsubo catback exhaust revealed 10rwkw gain through mid range and up top. So surely a 3" catback is limiting your power.

^ Ye but think, ~5psi for only 20rwkw more (or there abouts). Things are certainly on the limits of flow @ these points.

Be interesting to see the heat/Intake temps as well on such high levels

Still agree though, 3.5" exhaust could add benefit. Simple way to test that anyhow, just drop it from before the CAT - do a run and have a looksee :)

Not really after more power gains, just curious if low down response and spool will improve.

Might try and jam a 100mm one in.

I'd be surprised if going from a 60mm to 100mm I/C, larger piping and so on - That you'll see increased response. It's more than likely going to hurt it making everything bigger. It's just more volume/area that needs to be filled at the end of the day.

^ Ye but think, ~5psi for only 20rwkw more (or there abouts). Things are certainly on the limits of flow @ these points.

Be interesting to see the heat/Intake temps as well on such high levels

Remember Conan is running a built RB25/30, the other guy is running a stock RB25 Neo.

Still agree though, 3.5" exhaust could add benefit. Simple way to test that anyhow, just drop it from before the CAT - do a run and have a looksee :)

I Agree

I'd be surprised if going from a 60mm to 100mm I/C, larger piping and so on - That you'll see increased response. It's more than likely going to hurt it making everything bigger. It's just more volume/area that needs to be filled at the end of the day.

I Agree

Remember Conan is running a built RB25/30, the other guy is running a stock RB25 Neo.

And hence i didn't say 7-8psi :)

As seen from Al's own 3076 results, the turbo simply noses over around the 320-340rwkw marker anyway as they just can't flow anymore and are absolutely on the limit.

conan isn't after more power anyway - it's a response question. Exhaust could aid in that area, i dont think the rest however will. (unless its tested and shown to have issues)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. A 3d wheel alignment is like $120...just take it to the shop. Since theres probably multiple adjustments that need to be made after changing something. Mine has front/rear lower arms, traction rods, tension rods, camber arms, toe arms, front upper arms, hicas kit, sway bars and coilovers. I measure from the edge of the bolt holes on the originals and set the same length on all the adjustable stuff to dial it as close as I could to OEM. Took it straight for alignment; it didnt feel right at all...after alignment, it feels perfect. Similarly i've just changed the springs on another car; and I still needed multiple adjustments to bring it back in spec.
    • A full Veilside kitted JZA80 Supra in Meriken park in Kobe city a few weeks back
    • Its a well known brand in New Zealand; its a rebrand of the Rhino RAV3.  I don't know what the wiring difference *is* between the rev.1 (installed about 15 years ago) and rev.2; but as you say I would think its reasonable that it uses the same immobiliser relay circuits. I had a look but couldnt see a similar harness; but didnt move things around since I didnt want to mess with it   It was one of AVS well known Authorised Installers; I spoke to AVS themselves about it but theyre unsure hence seeking advice more so from the skyline community who are more familiar with the actual car and its wiring. Im in Auckland; but the installer is on the other side of the city so hes very reluctant to come back to even look at it to confirm something isnt connected into the wrong wire.  I dont want to drop the name since they *did* do a really good job for the most part. Everything is very tidy and he fully replaced all the alarm wiring, all the sensors, the wiring to the door motors, installed a switch which was never installed in the first place...really happy with the alarm install itself..just not this one issue. We all make mistakes, if it is the alarm, I just want my fuel pump getting proper switched, fused, power as it was; without having to shell out for an auto electrician to switch a wire and tell me it was the alarm. 
    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
×
×
  • Create New...