Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Currently have standard gtr intercooler 50mm or so , with 2.5 inch piping on both sides.

Turbo has 4 inch inlet , plenum is 3 inch.

Exhaust is 3 inch right through off stock manifold.

337rwkw now.

If I went 80mm intercooler and 3 inch piping, what would I expect.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/359900-bigger-intercooler-and-piping/
Share on other sites

A rough guide for cooler plumbing is-

Hot side- keep the pipe diameter the same size as the turbo outlet..

Cold side- keep the pipe work a close size to the tb...

Your stock gtr cooler shouldn't hold you back for your power level, to make it a little more efficient- close the gaps up between it and the front bar and above the grill.

If your going to do anything, swap out the post cooler to tb pipe with a 3" pipe. There will be very little gain, unless you have some crazy bends in there though...

For the same money as a custom 3" cooler pipe (say $35 per bend + fab = $200 odd) buy a better set of brake pads/fluid/lines or a 3.5" muffler to see a better performance gain.

J.

Are you on E85 now?

More boost?

Did you fix the boost dropping issue from your previous runs? (dyno thread)

310rwkw @ 15psi from a 3076 is a bit unrealistic so it's looking like you've changed fuel to me (just goin off the dyno sheet)

Found it:

RB25/30 Series 1 R33

Tomei Poncams

550 top feed injectors

Plasmaman plenum 72mm throttle body

Forged internals

Haltech Sport 2000 ECU

Single 044

GT3076R low mount

I suppose the only real way to confirm if larger piping would be beneficial is to measure the pressure drop and temperature increase along the different sections of the piping. I agree with the previous post that the hot pipe will be fine, if there are gains it will be the cold pipe going to your 72mm throttle body.

I have been looking at 'infrared thermometer guns', wow they look cool. Chuck the car on a dyno and sit there pointing at different parts of the pipework measuring the temp!

Another idea I am looking at as well is to ceramic coat the cold pipe, but that will depend on the temp results you get. I was reading about an R32 GTS-T that their during the cold pipe air increased temps by 26 degrees!!

Are you on E85 now?

More boost?

Did you fix the boost dropping issue from your previous runs? (dyno thread)

310rwkw @ 15psi from a 3076 is a bit unrealistic so it's looking like you've changed fuel to me (just goin off the dyno sheet)

Also more thoughts.

Tested pressure turbo outlet & @ plenum to find out if there is a pressure drop?

And/or temp diffences? (you might have a sensor. not sure)

Also more thoughts.

Tested pressure turbo outlet & @ plenum to find out if there is a pressure drop?

And/or temp diffences? (you might have a sensor. not sure)

No, still on 98Ron pump fuel.

Don't think I'll ever go E85, I like the current setup too much.

Injectors are 570 top feed on custom rail, not 550.

Drives economically and idles like a kitten.

3.5 exhaust is tempting, but probably pointless with stock manifold, plus Db exhaust levels will increase.

There is a temp probe on the cold side.

Intercooler is fully custom made,was on it when I bought the car.

One reason why I'm looking at new ones is I'm assuming my existing one is full of oil again, after massive surge through PCV last track day. Oil was dripping out my BOV for 6 weeks, so I reckon is was drawn back into the cooler.

Already had it pulled out and flushed before, may as well replace it.

PCV now blocked.

Not really after more power gains, just curious if low down response and spool will improve.

Might try and jam a 100mm one in.

3.5 exhaust is tempting, but probably pointless with stock manifold, plus Db exhaust levels will increase.

I disagree with this, I think a 3.5 exhaust will assist you greatly. Even just the cat and catback system.

Here is info from another car:

stock 25NEO

standard exhaust manifold

3076 .82 rear .6 front cover

E85

1000cc injectors

running 27psi :whistling:

Power FC

Blits Return flow cooler

3" dump pipe, 3.5" cat and 3.5" hks catback exhaust

350rwkw

Plus, even on my lowly 270rwkw setup a dyno test without my 3" fujitsubo catback exhaust revealed 10rwkw gain through mid range and up top. So surely a 3" catback is limiting your power.

^ Ye but think, ~5psi for only 20rwkw more (or there abouts). Things are certainly on the limits of flow @ these points.

Be interesting to see the heat/Intake temps as well on such high levels

Still agree though, 3.5" exhaust could add benefit. Simple way to test that anyhow, just drop it from before the CAT - do a run and have a looksee :)

Not really after more power gains, just curious if low down response and spool will improve.

Might try and jam a 100mm one in.

I'd be surprised if going from a 60mm to 100mm I/C, larger piping and so on - That you'll see increased response. It's more than likely going to hurt it making everything bigger. It's just more volume/area that needs to be filled at the end of the day.

^ Ye but think, ~5psi for only 20rwkw more (or there abouts). Things are certainly on the limits of flow @ these points.

Be interesting to see the heat/Intake temps as well on such high levels

Remember Conan is running a built RB25/30, the other guy is running a stock RB25 Neo.

Still agree though, 3.5" exhaust could add benefit. Simple way to test that anyhow, just drop it from before the CAT - do a run and have a looksee :)

I Agree

I'd be surprised if going from a 60mm to 100mm I/C, larger piping and so on - That you'll see increased response. It's more than likely going to hurt it making everything bigger. It's just more volume/area that needs to be filled at the end of the day.

I Agree

Remember Conan is running a built RB25/30, the other guy is running a stock RB25 Neo.

And hence i didn't say 7-8psi :)

As seen from Al's own 3076 results, the turbo simply noses over around the 320-340rwkw marker anyway as they just can't flow anymore and are absolutely on the limit.

conan isn't after more power anyway - it's a response question. Exhaust could aid in that area, i dont think the rest however will. (unless its tested and shown to have issues)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...