Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ummm do you mean a Greddy manifold? Plazmaman doesn't touch the runners.

While getting to the oil filter is harder, it aint that big of a deal. The only thing that made mine harder is the extra braided lines teeing into the fuel lines for the nitrous being in the way.

You remove the top half of the std manifold to fit the plazmaman plenum - hence you halve the manifold length or close enough to it anyway.

i will have to check to see if i still have my dyno print outs.

Nothing else was change when i did the plenum swap if i remember right, i think i even ran the same boost on the retune. Interesting that when the retune was done, the whole tune had to be wipe and start again as everything was out with the gtr plenum on.

For me no bottom end loss, the car was more responsive everywhere.

The blitz plate are only 100mm thick maybe less. i had the plate which connects to the head slightly ported to suit the head ports.

The kit is now on a friends car, however it is having turbo issue so has not had a proper retune. Will be interesting to see the result he get as it is running an identical setup to what i had (even has my old hks pro s turbo)

Edit: just for info the photo i posted was with my newer setup which was running a 3037S however the result were not as good as my engine was dieing, very low compression and eating oil

Its funny that you say it was more respsonsive everywhere. Are you sure it wasnt that you have twice the available air at any throttle position.

Its like tuning electronic throttles - all you have to do is give them more actual throttle at the same APP and they think the car is so much faster - when in reality at full throttle it still makes the exact same power!

Have you got dyno graphs to prove back to back runs with nothing but the intake manifold change. Talk to some of the RB25 guys that go to the plazman manifold - they all experience some bottom end loss due the runner length halving.

You remove the top half of the std manifold to fit the plazmaman plenum - hence you halve the manifold length or close enough to it anyway.

Still not following you dude. What are you exactly halving the length of? Runners stay the same and you are swapping one plenum for another plenum which is larger.

I don't see what is getting halved (or smaller for that fact).

Pretty hard to prove or disprove what plenum is or isnt better. Very few if any have ever did a plenum only change and dynoed the car before and after.

I've been using a greddy with a phonelic spacer to increase runner length and I have no complaints. I looked at the plazmaman product and others but to me it was like trying to cram a 200 litre fuel drum under the bonnet.

Skyline engine bays are cramped enough and hard enough to work on under the plenums and in that general area without adding to it.

Still not following you dude. What are you exactly halving the length of? Runners stay the same and you are swapping one plenum for another plenum which is larger.

I don't see what is getting halved (or smaller for that fact).

The std top half of the manifold is not just an open plenum it has about 5inches of runner in it before it opens up into a small plenum just before the throttle body.

Theoretically it should be better.

do the maths to see whether your six ITB have a greater area then the usual 100mm job everyone seems to put on the car.

there is also the benefit of minimizing un-throttled air volume in the plenum itself.

whether it would make a difference on such a compromised application as a pretty normal skyline engine is something you will have to find empirically :/

Pretty hard to prove or disprove what plenum is or isnt better. Very few if any have ever did a plenum only change and dynoed the car before and after.

I've been using a greddy with a phonelic spacer to increase runner length and I have no complaints. I looked at the plazmaman product and others but to me it was like trying to cram a 200 litre fuel drum under the bonnet.

Skyline engine bays are cramped enough and hard enough to work on under the plenums and in that general area without adding to it.

How thick is your phenolic 'spacer' gasket, isolator- etc? Was it bought or was it fabbed up for you? If so where and who did it for you?

Cheers

Justin

Woah good thread. Thanks Kaido_RR for that little guide should help heaps when I put mine together. I managed to pick up inlet and adapter plate, only one I have ever seen for sale. Can get some pics of my adapter plates if you want guys?

would be fantastic!

im still a bit baffled by the link i put up earlier of the guy who did ITB's on his neo with NO adaptor plate... how is this done does anyone know?

i'd pm the guy but he doesnt look like an active member of SAU anymore

X-Rated, I know a place called Mace Engineering make the phenolic isolators/spacers.

They advertise them on their website as 10mm or something for around $100 but apparently they can supply whatever thickness you request. Unsure of extra costs though...

If you get some prices let us know.

& Simon-S14, did you read his whole thread?

He welded on to the head, then machined his welding flat, tapped threads, etc to re-create the RB26 stud pattern on his NEO head...

Quite a lot of work!

How thick is your phenolic 'spacer' gasket, isolator- etc? Was it bought or was it fabbed up for you? If so where and who did it for you?

Cheers

Justin

It added 30 mil to the runner length and was made by Mace engineering in Melbourne. It is an amazing insulator s well. Even after prolonged high revs I can put my hand on the plenum.

Can't find the thread now but str8e180 has posted photos in the past of a modified set of rb25 runners with flanges to suit the 26 itb's. So i'd guess powertune could do something for you too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...