Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow amazing! About bloody time some one updated the "spark plug". Was actually discussing this with my mate a few months back talking about how there really havn't been any proper advancements in spark plugs for decades other than using precious metals as electrodes.

i would be concerned about the battery's ability to handle the laser ignition...

Batteries provide a huge amount of capacitance, so I cant see any obvious problem. What am i missing?

Pfft - diesels have been running without spark plugs for a century. Nothing new here.

how the hell does that compare? diesels have a compression ratio of something like 20:1 to ignite the fuel. try using that kind of compression in a petrol engine.

Batteries provide a huge amount of capacitance, so I cant see any obvious problem. What am i missing?

i have no idea about batteries, that's my problem, i'm looking forward to see what can be done about these laser ignition systems, and would they be relevant to our aging RB engines?

i have no idea about batteries, that's my problem, i'm looking forward to see what can be done about these laser ignition systems, and would they be relevant to our aging RB engines?

That's exactly what I was wondering. Surely the roll-out of this technology would require serious modification to existing vehicles? Ecu, coilpacks, for a start would probably need a change.

i would reckon its not just supplying a current, but also the timing and such, not sure how electrical signals work, but maybe, there can be a "translator" sort of thing that changes the signal for the sparkplugs to something relevant to the lasers?

i would reckon its not just supplying a current, but also the timing and such, not sure how electrical signals work, but maybe, there can be a "translator" sort of thing that changes the signal for the sparkplugs to something relevant to the lasers?

Hmmmm sounds cheap lol. It'd need a retune to take full effect of the new technology though.

Lol I guess if they lasted a lifetime though they may pay for themselves (it'll be a while before the new technology becomes that reliable)

i wonder how they'd get around the carbon build up on the lazer lens. unless it closed somehow.

Maybe like a spark plug does now - the laser could burn off any carbon.

Next step to upgrade the tech on an RB would be direct injection since that's a mature technology already. The laser stuff is a while away if it ever gets into production.

I reckon internal combustion has got a fair bit of life left in it. Either ethanol or gas (Australia has shedloads of gas. There's just been a $90 billion 20 year deal signed with China).

In regards to the battery issue...BMW and M-Benz have been pushing for 48Volt sytems for a few years now.

They say they have gone as far as they can using 12 volt

these cars have elec brakes/steering/throttle/suspention & 11ty diffent computers etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...